What the **** does this mean? You were just arguing the difference in crime was due to genetics, now it is "class"?
As we have already had a two term male black president, it's obvious that race isn't the issue. If you want to argue sexism, okay, but try doing that without all the mitigating factors regarding the two female presidential candidates. As per the history of the first - framing every last accuser of her husband that dared bring up his alleged rape and improprieties, that wasn't a big help - and a "I can't think of anything I'd do differently" on the second, regarding her seriously impaired boss that enacted so many perverse laws against Americans - but more importantly, Palestinian women and children - as to be without doubt, void of any standard of ethics or morals, never mind a protector of American interests
Don't be upset because I'm smarter.
LOL. You lost because you lost working class voters. Even your own side admits to this.
Schweddy says racism ended when slavery ended, when did US racism end in your world?
Oh yeah, I forgot. Your excellency sounds an awful lot like the other smartest person in the world. You keep shady company.
Don't forget Trump won in 2016.
Finally, the poster we all remember! Less sniping and more content.
I'm not bragging, I just said something in a broad statement and you immediately went into specifics about unions replying as though it was relevant.
It was irrational because my position was meta level and you jumped into unions as though you were defending something very specific.
You don't remember me, you are lying. You have a history of avoiding nearly all of my content.
Of course you wouldn't say that because you don't know the levels;
Yer spewing broad and vague, as per usual.
It was a point about the difference in who supports labor or capital, you are under the delusion that both sides carry the mantle for labor and capital the same, in your broad and vague way, which is meaningless. You see no difference between who the parties favor, which votes they tend to attract. If you don't know that labor has been in the Dem favor for decades, you don't know anything about US politics.
Not only is this Goldwater Inst bullshit, it still avoids debating which party was most strongly associated with labor.
Getting specific in an argument is not a sign of lack of intelligence or reason, but miss-defining and improperly using big words you don't understand can be irrational, but more often its a case of ignorance.
Cat got your tongue? Why don’t you tell the rest of us poor illiterate peons what it’s like to breathe the rarified airs you and Trump share?
The Magaletariat.
I just had to go back to this bit of dumb. Capitalism, by its very nature of attempting to dominate a market, is monopolistic.....and......A LOT of laws regulating businesses are designed to STOP monopolies......and that was something liberal progressives in the US in the 20's and 30's worked to put in place.
So that's a no from you.
I never said genetics. I said racism is over. The concerns about racism are a class issue and not a race issue.
True, but they cannot create a monopoly in a vacuum. It takes laws to force people to purchase/use from a specific group or corporation or party.
I call bullshit. Both Dems and Reps are complicit. Both get massive amount of money from lobbyists and both act accordingly.
Poe post. Oh goodie.
By at least 1500%.
Trump and his bimbentourage walked into a bar.
Your book is banned in Florida. And Texas. And Oklahoma.
Take the Amtrak. California Zephyr.
You are lying again:
Which is another bit of idiocy.
This is complete nonsense, you are defining the issue within the context of race, then you are denying the concept of race. This is idiocy.
"Statistically, blacks commit more crime than any other minority."
