- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 97,288
- Reaction score
- 100,874
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It would be "explain the propaganda angle more," not "explain more the propaganda angle." Either way, I don't speak a second language, so it's a bit hypocritical for me to throw stones. I just get annoyed by the whole "concerned American" angle when I'm not sure that's the case.Between voice to translate, my fat, thumbs and the fact that this is an Internet form which automatically puts it into the column of things that I can’t take to seriously, I probably won’t be proofreading and having an editor review my posts . I’m extremely likely to continue to have typographical and grammatical errors. Apologies in advance.
I would love you to explain more the propaganda angle.
Yes! I still feel like it’s something you have to have faith in in order for it to work and it can’t help our country that a huge portion of people don’t have faith in it. It’ll be decades before the deniers all dead and gone so I think it’s an important issue
As for the point, however, I don't see how supporting someone who tried to overthrow democracy via a self coup could help democracy. I think that it would do the opposite.