• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you want support of pro 2nd Amendment Democrats or not?

Yes. They're my favorite type of democrat.
 
tererun said:
I think you mean to ask my stance on gun issues. I am actually pro-gun ownership though I do support things like background checks and strict training for people who want to own guns. We have to learn to drive a car and that has a purpose outside of killing someone, we should have licensed gun owners who are trained in how to use and handle guns which really have only one purpose and that is to kill.
Click to expand...

if you want to compare guns with cars you are going to be upset

I don't need a license to own a car, I can drive it on private property without a license, I can buy a car at 16 and I can buy a car in any state of the union no matter w here I live and my Ohio DL is recognized in every state and territory of the USA. and your moronic claim that the only purpose of guns is to kill suggests you are completely ignorant of the olympics and many other organized sporting events

so you have been proven wrong on that point right there
 
TurtleDude said:
if you want to compare guns with cars you are going to be upset

I don't need a license to own a car, I can drive it on private property without a license, I can buy a car at 16 and I can buy a car in any state of the union no matter w here I live and my Ohio DL is recognized in every state and territory of the USA. and your moronic claim that the only purpose of guns is to kill suggests you are completely ignorant of the olympics and many other organized sporting events

so you have been proven wrong on that point right there
Click to expand...

yes, you are correct analogies are not often the exact same thing because they are different. Thank you captain obvious. I sort of proceded with the knowledge any person with a brain would know that guns and cars are not the same. Since I even use that in my argument when I say that cars have a lot more importance than guns do and we license those people perhaps we should also license gun owners in a more strict fasion. But if you are happy stating the obvious point that most educated thinking people already knew, you go there with your bad self.
 
tererun said:
yes, you are correct analogies are not often the exact same thing because they are different. Thank you captain obvious. I sort of proceded with the knowledge any person with a brain would know that guns and cars are not the same. Since I even use that in my argument when I say that cars have a lot more importance than guns do and we license those people perhaps we should also license gun owners in a more strict fasion. But if you are happy stating the obvious point that most educated thinking people already knew, you go there with your bad self.
Click to expand...

why do you want to fashion laws that do not even affect those most likely to misuse them. and your arrogant posts as to education are just that. You were the one who started with the car analogy not me. and you are completely wrong as to the purpose of all guns. so you are being hypocritical and wrong at the same time
 
TurtleDude said:
why do you want to fashion laws that do not even affect those most likely to misuse them. and your arrogant posts as to education are just that. You were the one who started with the car analogy not me. and you are completely wrong as to the purpose of all guns. so you are being hypocritical and wrong at the same time
Click to expand...

I don't think that word means what you think it means. Actually i am quite sure you have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of the word hypocritical and should not be tossing it about as you are one of the biggest most hypocritical people on this board. I have always held the belief that people should be licensed to own guns, and that there should be more than just a background check and a few simple questions in order to own one. These are not playthings to be just handed to people with no instructions or training, they are tools designed for the sole purpose of killing other people and things. So yes people should be trained in handling, shooting, and responsible gun ownership and they should be observed during that training for problems so that as many dumbasses as possible are restricted in ownership. though i gladly support the many responsible and well trained gun owners i know because they do the right thing with their weapons, i am all for removing as many dumb ****s as possible from the gun owner lists.

On top of that if you really want to talk hypocracy you restrict people from smoking a joint in society when THC has never killed a person before, but guns you get to have on no training and a simple background check. If you are going to sell guns which have the sole purpose of inflicting heavy damage to whatever you shoot then you can certainly allow drugs which have medicinal and recreational purposes outside of any damage they do. Seriously, i sell a kid a joint and they go out and kill someone and they are going to find me and make me responsible, but if I sell some kid a gun and he goes out and shoots someone I have no responsibility for his actions. That is BS and you know it.
 
The idea of someone supporting gun control or not, is quickly becoming immaterial.
3D printers will render most, if not all, measures attempting to prevent firearm ownership moot.

Technology eventually supersedes law.
Welcome to the future.
 
tererun said:
I don't think that word means what you think it means. Actually i am quite sure you have absolutely no understanding of the meaning of the word hypocritical and should not be tossing it about as you are one of the biggest most hypocritical people on this board. I have always held the belief that people should be licensed to own guns, and that there should be more than just a background check and a few simple questions in order to own one. These are not playthings to be just handed to people with no instructions or training, they are tools designed for the sole purpose of killing other people and things. So yes people should be trained in handling, shooting, and responsible gun ownership and they should be observed during that training for problems so that as many dumbasses as possible are restricted in ownership. though i gladly support the many responsible and well trained gun owners i know because they do the right thing with their weapons, i am all for removing as many dumb ****s as possible from the gun owner lists.

On top of that if you really want to talk hypocracy you restrict people from smoking a joint in society when THC has never killed a person before, but guns you get to have on no training and a simple background check. If you are going to sell guns which have the sole purpose of inflicting heavy damage to whatever you shoot then you can certainly allow drugs which have medicinal and recreational purposes outside of any damage they do. Seriously, i sell a kid a joint and they go out and kill someone and they are going to find me and make me responsible, but if I sell some kid a gun and he goes out and shoots someone I have no responsibility for his actions. That is BS and you know it.
Click to expand...

when your post makes gaping errors like your moronic rant that I am opposed to dope legalization the rest of your arguments pretty much get flushed. anyone who has been on this board for a while understands that I am a complete supporter of legalization. Since your post is premised on a major failure on your part, it sort of swirls down the porcelain bowl

A RIGHT should not be subject to a LICENSE

given so many asses want to deprive us of our rights, I am not going to agree to something that is both unconstitutional and does not even apply to those most willing and likely to use guns improperly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom