- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 29,957
- Reaction score
- 14,683
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Finally the truth comes out........There are a lot of countries that ban religion.......Why don't you move there?
It isn't gay marriage that should be banned, it is religion. For as of yet I have not seen a married gay couple murder people that do not believe as they do, religion however ….
LOL. What is humorous is that you do not seem to be able to see how you would be a much better fit there than anyone that is actually tolerant of those that differ from themselves.
There are very few countries that ban religion. I do not know where you got your information from. Maybe you meant that 1 religion is allowed in some countries and no others but in most countries at least one religion is allowed and in most countries freedom of religion is possible.
So moving to a country that bans religion is extremely difficult and for an American moving to one would be next to impossible.
A secular government [The FedGov] shouldn't be passing laws concerning marriage. That should be left to the states as it has been in the past.
I can't believe you say that..I already listed the countries that say join Islam or you are a infidel that must die.
I can't believe you say that..I already listed the countries that say join Islam or you are a infidel that must die.
Navy Pride said:There are a lot of countries that ban religion
Banning religion is utterly ridiculous.
Nice dodge,
Defending homosexuals and SSM is no way to show it. IMO.
The Bible is fairly clear.
Are we splitting hairs? To the best of my knowledge it doesn't even address "consensual" homosexuality but it does address homosexuality and definitely labels it a sin.
If my granddaughter looks up at me after seeing two dudes getting married on TV and asks "Why?" it's in my life.
BTW: I'm going to tell her it's an abomination against God when she old enough to understand.
That means nothing.
I'd like to see that quote. Same old same old.
Zero quotes, as I said, you are not being honest.
Here's where you are mistaken... children are essential for the continuation of the species, that is what I said. All that was to the point that same sex "marriage" is not the same as regular marriage.
But as I see in other posts here, people have been so dishonest that they refuse to admit it, and actually state the false claim that it is the same. No point in even responding to those people.
This is rich coming from a user who, when presented with three of his own posts says no quotes were provided.
I'd also like to emphasize that my biggest concern here is the abuse of federal power. That just leads to more abuse. If a State okay's gay marriage, I can live with it. I don't agree, and feel that it is wrong, but that's fine.
It is now a routine practice of the left to abuse our rights to get what they want. That is dangerous. And I have not seen one person on the left here with the slightest clue as to that fact.
You again run from answering the question.
How is giving rights to people enslavement?
Again, put up for a vote in Nov. as a state constitutional amendment proposition.
If the people of Texas vote it's OK to support depravity, I'll never say another word on the subject.
I can't believe you say that..I already listed the countries that say join Islam or you are a infidel that must die.
That isn't "banning religion". It is promoting one religion to the point where all others are made illegal. There is still religion in those countries, just it is only a single main religion.
Moderator's Warning: |
Are you referring to OT or both OT and NT?There is a big difference between consensual homosexuality and homosexual rape. It's the latter that is addressed in the bible. There is also a difference between consensual homosexuality and homosexuality based on pagan rituals. It is the latter that is addressed in the Bible.
That was my point… religion has done more 'damage' throughout the existance of religion that 'gay marriage' will ever do to marriage.
No dodge. It is true that your religious beliefs and intolerance would fit better alongside Islam than I ever would. I mean, you all share so many beliefs and high levels intolerance.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...egalizing-gay-marriage-52.html#post1063665204
Do you know what a link is?
How is linking three of your posts equate to zero quotes?
I'm pretty sure that is not what I said, but you keep trying to find it. But, maybe we should make that a law, that you have to be married to have kids. What do you think? Also, that you must be able to reproduce, with your mate, at some point to get married. Boy, would that clear a lot of this crap up!Since when was marriage a requirement to have children?
But the religious rarely want to admit to the number of people that have been slaughtered in the name of their god.
Nice try.
Last time I checked Jesus taught his disciples to love their enemies and fellow man, and reach out to them with the Gospel of salvation. And you can't malign the faith by citing examples of those people who violate its precepts.
Yup Jesus was albout loving his fellow man, makes me wonder why his followers are so anti homosexual.
Because they actually follow Paul and not Jesus.
Now, there are certainly Christians who do follow Jesus, but far too many don't.
Some may say Jesus never spoke out against homosexuality. That’s not really true. Jesus is God. As God, Jesus is the one who gave Moses the Levitical law against gay sexual relations to begin with; and he’s the one who inspires all Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16), including prohibitions against gay sexual relations in Romans 1:26-27 and I Corinthians 6:9-10, etc.
It’s also worth noting that Jesus didn’t mention wife beating or other sins such as pedophilia either, and there are not many folks who would argue he approved of those behaviors. So Jesus was under no obligation to reiterate the moral laws against homosexual sin that already existed, unless there were clarifications to be made. (righterreport.com)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?