• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you concur with any race-based ideas articulated/acted on/held by white supremacist groups? (1 Viewer)

Do you concur with any race-based ideas articulated/acted on/held by white supremacist groups?


  • Total voters
    62
  • This poll will close: .
Simple poll question. Just answer it.

This poll seems to accept that 'races' actually exist and is, therefore, encouraging 'racism'.
 
I don't know what you mean by "Nazi tactics". But I did state "unless they engage in violence".

By Nazi tactics, I refer to the strong armed approach taken by the German Brown shirts, and Italian black shirts. They use brutality against all who opposed them. I think we agree, that those tactics were unacceptable then and now, yes?

Regards,
CP
 
This poll seems to accept that 'races' actually exist and is, therefore, encouraging 'racism'.

I do not support the ideology of many races; in fact, I just support one species and nothing more or less. With building a world government in decades to come, inter-breading will take place and over the next 2,000 years our looks will start to look the same.
 
By Nazi tactics, I refer to the strong armed approach taken by the German Brown shirts, and Italian black shirts. They use brutality against all who opposed them. I think we agree, that those tactics were unacceptable then and now, yes?

Regards,
CP

Yes.

I also disagree with Antifa's tendency to falsely label anyone who speaks out against them as being "fascists". I see that as a dishonest and transparent attempt to justify their violence. I pity the people who fall for their dishonesty.
 
Other than seeing "white" for what it is, a genetic mutation that in a few hundred years will disappear, I have no opinion on racial superiority. But, if anyone is truly honest, white skin is a physical handicap. And, the whiter it is, the more of a handicap it is. Ask that of anyone with fair skin within a day of them turning into a lobster after spending only a few hours out in the hot sun.

You are not suggesting that a proclivity to sunburn is a measure of race superiority. All skin colors could, and ought, to be called a mutation, yes? Gone n a couple hundred years? Geez, that surely excludes the fact of white skin existing for thousands of years, doesn't it?
Regard,
CP
 
Yes.

I also disagree with Antifa's tendency to falsely label anyone who speaks out against them as being "fascists". I see that as a dishonest and transparent attempt to justify their violence. I pity the people who fall for their dishonesty.

!00% with you!
Regards,
CP
 
Red:
I get your point, but insofar as it's a tiding, "have a nice day" isn't exactly the sort of statement with which one can agree or disagree. It's a statement of what another wishes for one. What is one to do? Agree that the speaker does so wish? Disagree that the speaker so wishes?

I was referring to the weather. If it was a beautiful day I'd have to agree.
 
Simple poll question. Just answer it.

Your question is a landmine. It must be answered very carefully. We no longer live in a free society. Just saying what one thinks is no longer acceptable nor encouraged.
 
Simple poll question. Just answer it.

I concur when most of them say that they are NOT white supremacists.

Most, like myself, are just protesting the double standard that allows blacks and other POC to advocate for their race while whites are called racist if they advocate for equality for whites.

But you knew that.
 
Other than seeing "white" for what it is, a genetic mutation that in a few hundred years will disappear, I have no opinion on racial superiority. But, if anyone is truly honest, white skin is a physical handicap. And, the whiter it is, the more of a handicap it is. Ask that of anyone with fair skin within a day of them turning into a lobster after spending only a few hours out in the hot sun.

LOL!

And we were smart enough to invent sunscreen.

:mrgreen:
 
I concur when most of them say that they are NOT white supremacists.

Most, like myself, are just protesting the double standard that allows blacks and other POC to advocate for their race while whites are called racist if they advocate for equality for whites.

But you knew that.

Are you afraid that a Jew will replace you? Are you afraid that a non-white will replace you?
 
Simple poll question. Just answer it.

im going to say no because im not a racist...
though it may be possible they have ideas that overlap that are just general ideas and not white supremacy ideas

you poll question actually isnt that simple, i answered anyway but it should be more specific
 
Do white supremacist groups believe black people are more likely to have sickle cell anemia than white people? If yes then I guess that is one “race-based” idea we have in common. Probably not what the OP meant, though. :)
 
Your question is a landmine. It must be answered very carefully. We no longer live in a free society. Just saying what one thinks is no longer acceptable nor encouraged.

One really need not say a damn thing. It a poll. Tick "yes" or "no" and one's done, and one's done all that I asked.
 
Your question is a landmine. It must be answered very carefully. We no longer live in a free society. Just saying what one thinks is no longer acceptable nor encouraged.

I am afraid that what you write is true. I guess being labeled has somehow replaced honest discourse. The only solution seems to be ignoring name calling, and believing what you know to be true, no fear! That is the only rescue left to the nation.
regards,
CP
 
One really need not say a damn thing. It a poll. Tick "yes" or "no" and one's done, and one's done all that I asked.

Then please, define "race based" in your view. Too many different ideas of its meaning.
 
One really need not say a damn thing. It a poll. Tick "yes" or "no" and one's done, and one's done all that I asked.

Please! You throw a baited question and expect no reply? Are you selling something? Or with the Nielsen rating group? Stop acting as though you are offended, or that no one should expound upon your premise.
Regards,
CP
 
Do you concur with any race-based ideas articulated/acted on/held by white supremacist groups?
Then please, define "race based" in your view. Too many different ideas of its meaning.

Seriously?

As articulated/acted on/held by white supremacists, race-based ideas are ideas that depend on white supremacists' conception(s) of the nature(s), and peculiarities and consequences thereunto/-from of one or more category of humans who share distinctive physical traits.
 
Your question is a landmine. It must be answered very carefully. We no longer live in a free society. Just saying what one thinks is no longer acceptable nor encouraged.

If it's not "acceptable" now, it's never been. There have always been those shunned for their views. In the South in the 1950s and 1960s, being in favor of civil rights for blacks might get you killed, for example, and you'd certainly be shunned and criticized if not beaten up by many of your peers.
 
If it's not "acceptable" now, it's never been. There have always been those shunned for their views. In the South in the 1950s and 1960s, being in favor of civil rights for blacks might get you killed, for example, and you'd certainly be shunned and criticized if not beaten up by many of your peers.

Just a comment on your post...
The reverse is true...just because it isn't accepted today, does not mean it never was. If that uncomfortable fact is ignored is ignored, History becomes subjective.
Regards,
CP
 
Just a comment on your post...
The reverse is true...just because it isn't accepted today, does not mean it never was. If that uncomfortable fact is ignored is ignored, History becomes subjective.
Regards,
CP

I don't know what "it" is in your post. When what isn't "accepted?" and what do you mean by "accepted?" And what "uncomfortable fact" are you talking about?

You're free to speak your mind, and doing so might get you into trouble. It's ALWAYS been that way, although what ideas or opinions get people in trouble changes over time, which is often a good thing.
 
Your question is a landmine. It must be answered very carefully. We no longer live in a free society. Just saying what one thinks is no longer acceptable nor encouraged.


One really need not say a damn thing. It a poll. Tick "yes" or "no" and one's done, and one's done all that I asked.
Please! You throw a baited question and expect no reply? Are you selling something? Or with the Nielsen rating group? Stop acting as though you are offended, or that no one should expound upon your premise.
Regards,
CP

Red:
I posed a neutrally phrased and binarily answerable question, and all I expect is that members tick the "yes" or "no" answer option.

I suggest you click on the following links to learn what neutral, baiting, loaded, trick and leading questions are.


Blue:
No.


Pink:
I assure you that umbrage is not the emotion I felt when responding to SDET's above quoted remark or about the member's remark itself. If you must know, what I felt about the remark is ennui and astonishment....ennui over the the remark's jejuneness and astonishment that the member construes the question as one that must be answered "carefully."


Tan + Pink ([Stop acting as though] "no one should expound upon your premise."):
I haven't and refrained from offering any normative notions about what folks expound. If members do expound on their poll answer, they do. If they don't, they don't. Furthermore, were I seeking more than just one's answers to the poll question, I'd have created the thread with an OP that entreats for discussion rather than a terse one that states "Simple question. Just answer it."

What part of "just answer it" suggests to you that anything more than one's answer is that for which I've, in posing my poll question, entreated?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom