Disastrous plan to destroy the US election - mail out ballots to millions of ineligible voters

[Glitch]

How can Americans trust the results of an election in which millions of ballots are mailed out to ineligible voters? Such confidence in the results cannot be restored in such a scenario.

It will take months, maybe more than a year to verify the results and then only if every ineligible ballot is removed from the counts. Such verification of ballot eligibility could take many months, plunging the nation into a state of confusion in which hordes of lawyers on both sides will fight over how to proceed while the election results remain unverified for so long a period of time. We may never be able to completely clean up the election results and then what?

The reason the General Election is held on the first Tuesday of November is because Congress established the law in 1948.

3 U.S.Code § 1

The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President.

All the States must verify and certify their election prior to the Electoral College vote on December 14, 2020. Then when Congress assembles for the next Session on January 6, 2021 at 1:00 PM EST the President of the Senate (a.k.a. the VP) reads the certified State election results to the House. The newly elected President is then sworn in on January 20, 2021.

It would require an act of Congress to delay the election, and Congress would be restricted by the requirements of the Twenty-Second Amendment. Meaning, no President can serve more than two four-year terms. Which means that they cannot extend Trump's term beyond the maximum 96 months as President without amending the US Constitution first.

Yes, the 2020 General Election will be rife with voter fraud, exactly as the Democratic Party has always wanted. Why do you think the Democratic Party is pushing mail-in ballots so hard? They know, as everyone does, that it is an extremely easy way to defraud the election.

 

[upsideguy]

Your assessment of Trump, his motives, his thoughts, his goals and so forth have nothing to do with the fact that if ineligible voters are allowed to vote in the election then the election results cannot be validated, casting the whole country into turmoil.

No, it has everything to do with it. If he wasn't perpetuating this myth, you would not have bought into it. It is nothing but an ugly fantasy, which you have too many of in your head. Please read real news and lay off the political porn. It is not good for your blood pressure. Its not good for your fellow DP posters to have to deal with this stuff.

 

[marke]

The article you posted about Wisconsin is from December of last year. It's curious you didn't look to see what has happened in the case since. Tell us, what exactly do you think the Wisconsin case is about from a legal perspective?

Oh, and the Wisconsin supreme court will hear the case next month...

Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Possibility Of Voter Roll Purge Before November | Wisconsin Public Radio
Name these states where "Democrats and liberals" are suing states that are purging their voter rolls in accordance with election laws.

Why bother with all of that when we can simply agree that if significant numbers of ballots are sent out to a significant number of legally questionable voters then the election results will be in total disarray.

 

[marke]

Were the voting rolls cleaned up when Trump was elected in 2016? If not, how do we know he was legitimately elected? :2razz:

No, I don't think so. But the difference will be in 2020 if the election results favor the democrat candidate then republicans are going to demand an accountability from states which sent out ballots to voters with questionable voting rights. Americans can hardly be expected to blindly accept the voting results if those results are possibly tainted by corruption. If the republican wins I hardly think the democrats will demand an investigation. Voting fraud is rare among republicans.

 

[BlueTex]

No, I don't think so. But the difference will be in 2020 if the election results favor the democrat candidate then republicans are going to demand an accountability from states which sent out ballots to voters with questionable voting rights.

Demand all they want, the courts will quickly make their determinations as they do in most election cycles...

 

[marke]

Who is telling this lie about millions of ballots to ineligible voters having ballots mailed to them?

What do you know about ballots being mailed to voters who are not authorized to vote? Can you prove it is not happening or do you not care if it happens?

 

[Luce]

What do you know about ballots being mailed to voters who are not authorized to vote? Can you prove it is not happening or do you not care if it happens?

You need to prove that it is happening.

 

[marke]

I don't know. Sounds like a couple of big 'if's'. Why do you say they won't?
I'm guessing this is only a problem if the candidate you support loses- then there will have been election mismanagement and voter fraud. I'm guessingvTrump only makes this look like an issue when it looks like he might lose. That's what he did last time, remember? He said the election was rigged every time a poll showed Clinton ahead of him.

Of course Trump is going to demand investigations into possible fraud if he loses. I look forward to that. Voter fraud has been a significant problem for more than a century and no serious widespread fraud investigation has ever been done. It is high time one is done and Trump may be just the one to see that it happens.

 

[Luce]

Of course Trump is going to demand investigations into possible fraud if he loses. I look forward to that. Voter fraud has been a significant problem for more than a century and no serious widespread fraud investigation has ever been done. It is high time one is done and Trump may be just the one to see that it happens.

Except that it hasn't been.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Of course Trump is going to demand investigations into possible fraud if he loses. I look forward to that. Voter fraud has been a significant problem for more than a century and no serious widespread fraud investigation has ever been done. It is high time one is done and Trump may be just the one to see that it happens.

Trump isn’t going to investigate anything. Once he loses he’s just gonna leave and spend the reminder of his term in FL at Mar a lago.

 

[marke]

No, it has everything to do with it. If he wasn't perpetuating this myth, you would not have bought into it. It is nothing but an ugly fantasy, which you have too many of in your head. Please read real news and lay off the political porn. It is not good for your blood pressure. Its not good for your fellow DP posters to have to deal with this stuff.

I have been fighting democrat voter fraud for 30 years. Trump did not get me started on this.

 

[marke]

Demand all they want, the courts will quickly make their determinations as they do in most election cycles...

If so, then hopefully it will be a court with a majority of good conservative judges on it which decides the election.

 

[marke]

You need to prove that it is happening.

That will all come out when Trump and Barr demand investigations after the election.

 

[marke]

Trump isn’t going to investigate anything. Once he loses he’s just gonna leave and spend the reminder of his term in FL at Mar a lago.

Trump and Barr will investigate if there is significant evidence of voter fraud.

 

[Luce]

That will all come out when Trump and Barr demand investigations after the election.

So what you're saying is you have no means to prove your case.

 

[BlueTex]

That will all come out when Trump and Barr demand investigations after the election.

Demand from whom?

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Trump and Barr will investigate if there is significant evidence of voter fraud.

Barr will be too concerned with the investigation *he’s* going to be under next year.

 

[Luce]

Barr will be too concerned with the investigation *he’s* going to be under next year.

Yeah, he's in my top ten list for "people who need to be in an orange romper."

 

[Grand Mal]

The reason the General Election is held on the first Tuesday of November is because Congress established the law in 1948.

3 U.S.Code § 1


All the States must verify and certify their election prior to the Electoral College vote on December 14, 2020. Then when Congress assembles for the next Session on January 6, 2021 at 1:00 PM EST the President of the Senate (a.k.a. the VP) reads the certified State election results to the House. The newly elected President is then sworn in on January 20, 2021.

It would require an act of Congress to delay the election, and Congress would be restricted by the requirements of the Twenty-Second Amendment. Meaning, no President can serve more than two four-year terms. Which means that they cannot extend Trump's term beyond the maximum 96 months as President without amending the US Constitution first.

Yes, the 2020 General Election will be rife with voter fraud, exactly as the Democratic Party has always wanted. Why do you think the Democratic Party is pushing mail-in ballots so hard? They know, as everyone does, that it is an extremely easy way to defraud the election.

Why would a party that is clearly going to win anyway risk their victory? If half (approximately) of Americans are Democrats, are half of Americans abysmally stupid and corrupt?

 

[upsideguy]

I have been fighting democrat voter fraud for 30 years. Trump did not get me started on this.

You have won. There is no voter fraud. I did not know that it was you that vanquished it. Congratulations. Wait, there never has been any real voter fraud so what did you do? Nothing really, but enjoy the kudos anyway.

The only real "fraud" is the voter suppression efforts of the Republicans, including wholesale purging of voter rolls, insufficient number voting machines in Democratic districts, voter ID and now, the nonsense that you and Trump are pushing, questioning vote by mail, which has been outstanding here in Colorado.

Top Trump adviser: Republicans have 'always' relied on voter suppression | US politics | The Guardian

So, if you really are about our voter fraud in affecting our democracy, perhaps focus on getting the Republican party to not be so afraid of the vote. (Psst ---- it would help if the party actually had policies that served the people..)

 

[Glitch]

Why would a party that is clearly going to win anyway risk their victory? If half (approximately) of Americans are Democrats, are half of Americans abysmally stupid and corrupt?

Because Democrat filth can't win without cheating.

Did you think California government runs honest elections? If so, then you went to a government school and were indoctrinated. Six California counties alone have over 1,000,000 ineligible registrations. That does not include the three million illegal voters on California's voting rolls a Federal judge ordered be deleted — and were not, in violation of a court order.

In 2017-18, EIPCa sued the LA County registrar and California's SOS over similar findings. A settlement was reached in which the state agreed to begin removing millions of ineligible, inactive-status registrants from its rolls. While California counties research the eligibility of their inactive registrants, thousands of new voter registrations have been added through the state’s automatic DMV voter registration system, growing the list from eight counties to thirteen. While San Francisco and San Diego counties have made progress by cancelling hundreds of thousands of inactive registrants, new counties joined the list as their new registrations have accelerated.

California adds hundreds of illegal voters to the rolls every day by issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens, who are then automatically registered to vote for the Democrat Party. And they are, unfortunately, not the only Democrat-controlled State deliberately violating the law. It is what Democrat scum do every day.

 

[marke]

So what you're saying is you have no means to prove your case.

If Trump loses do you think he will not demand an investigation if it is discovered ballots were sent out to people whom states knew may not have had the right to vote?

 

[marke]

Demand from whom?

All honest Americans will demand something be done about the election results if it is discovered states willfully sent ballots to people they had reason to believe may not have been allowed to vote.

 

[marke]

Barr will be too concerned with the investigation *he’s* going to be under next year.

Dirty democrats spent years digging for dirt on Trump and came up with nothing they could use to bring him down. They will not find anything on Barr to bring him down other than through their own false accusations, their own misinterpretation of the law, and their own perversions of judgement and justice.

 

[marke]

Yeah, he's in my top ten list for "people who need to be in an orange romper."

Holder defied Congress and was cited for contempt, yet democrats loved him. Democrats hate Barr because he refuses to back down on investigations of democrat crooks.