• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Didn't take long

NatMorton said:
Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! ...
Click to expand...

Yes, that is the **** the right is currently sucking, thank you for letting us all know. The right needs to wipe their chins from the Trump jizz.
 
NatMorton said:
Yes, you can.

You might want to stop for a moment and ask yourself "do email messages and texts only exist in one place?"
Click to expand...
Ok, have fun, let us know the results. How much are these investigations going to cost us taxpayers?
 
NatMorton said:
Your second quoted statement is demonstrably false. There is more than enough evidence coming from that laptop to warrant at least a preliminary investigation.
Click to expand...
Evidence?
 
NatMorton said:
Shokin has absolutely nothing to do with it. Anyone with even a basic understanding of conflict of interest law or policy would know Biden should not have gone within a country mile of that case.

When you are a public official -- never mind the effing Vice President of the United States -- you don't get involved in any way, shape, or form with a foreign state's prosecution of a corporation paying a family member $50k a month.

Biden had to know this was a problem, yet he did it anyway. That alone is suspicious.
Click to expand...
You guys have suspicions coming out of your pores.
 
bongsaway said:
So now you've come here with your victim story? Why?
Click to expand...
I am not a victim all my bad choices were caused by me, not by a politician, I own my mistakes, because I am not a safe space seeking liberal
1668721173988.png



1668721342929.webp
 
JasperL said:
OK, didn't know that Hunter allegedly paying some expenses for his dad is a bribe, but that's fine. Should we see if Ginni pays any of the household expenses for Justice Thomas' household, since that's a bribe?
Click to expand...
If we take Hunter's words literally, Burisma was paying him $50k a month and Huner was splitting that money with Joe. If you want to dismiss that as "paying some expenses," be my guest, but you're only going to look silly doing it.


JasperL said:
And give me a break with the 'off-schedule meeting' crap. We know you do not care about that.
Click to expand...
This thread is not about me.

JasperL said:
Sure he does. The problem with Shokin, recognized by everyone, was his career of not prosecuting anyone, including Burisma.

Which is why it wasn't a problem for the point man in the ME accepting a $billion+ payout from Qatar, while Jared is heading up the Trump WH policy with regard to Qatar!!!

Oh, wait.... 🤪
Click to expand...
Nope. Biden had a clear conflict of interest and should have recused himself from the matter. If you don't understand that you don't understand the first thing about conflict of interest governance.
 
Rawley said:
Odd. Fourth or fifth post where your only defense of Biden's corruption is TRUMP
Click to expand...
You said, "At some point you guys agreed that threatening a foreign leader with withholding aid was an impeachable offense. Let's go with that authority"

Don't blame me for addressing your comment.

And I'm not going to pretend that we didn't just go through 4 years with POTUS breaking any and every known conflict of interest principle without you MAGAs blinking an eye. Ivanka and Jared had WH jobs, top secret security clearances, and ran their businesses the entire time while holding WH jobs and those security clearances in the most incredible demonstration of conflict of interests we've ever seen.
 
sub1028 said:
Good, there something fishy, when the press and tweeter and Facebook refused to let you speak about it? Why the cover up?
Click to expand...
There is something fishy alright when a political party takes it's orders from a failed one term President who tried to overturn an election. Really really fishy.
 
ElChupacabra said:
Yeah, which is why it doesn't look very promising.
Click to expand...

Rather myopic that you believe terminating or indicting employees is the only way an organization can be reformed.
 
Davin said:
Because that was their priority and what they ran on. That is what they said NEEDED to be addressed IMMEDIATELY. Guess revenge is more important to the right than the American people, got it. Bunch of ****ing liars on the right.
Click to expand...

I guess you won’t vote for any of “them” again. ;)
 
JasperL said:
You said, "At some point you guys agreed that threatening a foreign leader with withholding aid was an impeachable offense. Let's go with that authority"

Don't blame me for addressing your comment.

And I'm not going to pretend that we didn't just go through 4 years with POTUS breaking any and every known conflict of interest principle without you MAGAs blinking an eye. Ivanka and Jared had WH jobs, top secret security clearances, and ran their businesses the entire time while holding WH jobs and those security clearances in the most incredible demonstration of conflict of interests we've ever seen.
Click to expand...
And you think childish namecalling helps your argument?
 
ttwtt78640 said:
I guess you won’t vote for any of “them” again. ;)
Click to expand...
So you are ok with lying as long as it is the right doing it. Thank you for proving me that the right are a bunch of liars.
 
NatMorton said:
Asked and answered. If you're going to sealion, get some fresh material.
Click to expand...
You never present any evidence. Just say “The big guy” and drop the mic like everybody else.
 
NatMorton said:
If we take Hunter's words literally, Burisma was paying him $50k a month and Huner was splitting that money with Joe. If you want to dismiss that as "paying some expenses," be my guest, but you're only going to look silly doing it.

This thread is not about me.
Nope. Biden had a clear conflict of interest and should have recused himself from the matter. If you don't understand that you don't understand the first thing about conflict of interest governance.
Click to expand...

They tried mighty hard to bury the conflict

Stefanik confirmed that one specific question Yovanovitch was asked to prepare for was, “What can you tell us about Hunter Biden’s being named to the board of Burisma?” Incredibly, Yovanovitch later testified that the State Department told her to deflect any questions she might get about Hunter Biden and Burisma by referring Senators’ questions to the vice president’s office.
Click to expand...

nypost.com

Obama administration knew Hunter Biden was shady, witness admits

Of all the supposedly shocking revelations that have emerged from the impeachment hearings this week, here’s one that the Democrats in Congress hope you don’t hear about: The Obama White House knew…
nypost.com nypost.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom