- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Messages
- 10,257
- Reaction score
- 4,161
- Location
- Washington, D.C.
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
First, TY for your answer....I haven't read it, but I'm sure there's stuff about Trump in it :mrgreen:
As goes the answer itself:
??? -- Seriously? That response is tantamount to saying a text about US history has sections that pertain to things England did, thus it's apropos to call the text a "book about England."
I mean, really, Dude. I expected you to respond with something sensible and understandable, something an adult would say. Perhaps something akin to: "Well, it's really not a "Trump book," but I included it anyway merely because I wanted to get a sense of how many the poll's respondents have read it."
To such a reply, I'd respond with something to the effect of "okay" or "understood," because there's really nothing else to say to such a reply. It makes sense; the choice to do so is "normal;" such a response is mature and doesn't strain any form of credulity. But you replied with a line that "grabs at straws" as might a 12-year-old, and followed that puerile reply with a "****-eating grin" emoticon.
As Amber says, "I was like, 'what?'"
Last edited: