The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
Nah. They're actually not screwing it up. Based on the last mid terms, people put the dems in the house for a reason. They're simply not coming dangerously close to what you're suggesting.
You are comparing some districts vs the electoral college. Not a good wager.
You're actually taking for granted that things that have been merely suggested by one individual will become policy of a candidate and a party. Not a good wager.
The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
Kamala has said she signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for her because of it.
Cory Booker has said he signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for him because of it.
If I were a member of the Democratic herd, I wouldn't be all that concerned.
The five or six who have thrown their hat in the ring so far have no chance of getting the nomination. They are nothing but cannon fodder. The Party Elites will decide when to trot out the nominee...and who it is...when they are ready, and it won't be anytime soon. Perhaps in the summer. It'll be clear who that is because the media will be all for the person.
In the meantime, the cannon fodder will spout off with their nonsense and that'll keep the Party plebes occupied. The Party Elites won't let them get too far out of hand.
So just be patient, Airyaman. You'll know who to vote for in due time. The media will tell you.
The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
Ah its early days still, the election is 21 months away. Lets not put the cart before the horse.
The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
I think what the Democrats are having is a relatively healthy discussion in the public view that will only amplify during the debates. Pelosi and AOC don't actually hate each other. Its similar to what the GOP went through in 2016 but not quite as bad.
Don't tell me, tell the early candidates.
Don't tell me, tell the early candidates.
The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
The most important job Democrats have -- in the view of this ex-Republican -- is to offer up someone who independents and NeverTrumpers can vote for instead of Trump.
Thus far, you are ****ing this up.
Example: the latest cluster **** is the "New Green Deal". Some of the early D contenders have "signed on". Kamala. Cory.
So they are out for this NeverTrumper. Kamala took herself out for me when she said she would eliminate all private health insurance, including that provided by employers.
As much as I've hated Nancy P. in the past, she gained some respect for saying the "New Green Deal" was a "dream deal". IOW, not realistic. She is at least pragmatic.
I will never vote for Trump. I would never normally vote for a Democrat either. But I considered it it as opposition to Trump.
Be careful of letting this pendulum swing too far. You are dangerously close to snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.
Don't tell me, tell the early candidates.
Kamala has said she signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for her because of it.
Cory Booker has said he signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for him because of it.
Kamala has said she signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for her because of it.
Cory Booker has said he signs on with the New Green Deal. I will not vote for him because of it.
So you are a denier and don't believe we need to transition from fossil fuels the sooner the better?
So you are a denier and don't believe we need to transition from fossil fuels the sooner the better?
You're actually taking for granted that things that have been merely suggested by one individual will become policy of a candidate and a party. Not a good wager.
So you are a denier and don't believe we need to transition from fossil fuels the sooner the better?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?