• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats told to abandon the racist party name -- Democrats

Are they tearing down statues of former KKK grand Kleagle Robert C. Byrd in West Virginia yet? If not this is all BS. I want every statue to Robt. C. Byrd destroyed and hanged in efigy.

A Kleagle is an officer of the Ku Klux Klan whose main role is to recruit new members.

He has statues?
 
Democrats proudly bought the battle flag of the confederacy to fly it. Changing it to liberals is not clever.

Everyone flying that traitor flag today is Republican and conservative. Deal with it.
 
So someone explain to me why Democrats want to tear down Confederate monuments if they are so racist.
 
Are they tearing down statues of former KKK grand Kleagle Robert C. Byrd in West Virginia yet? If not this is all BS.

Only if he never disavowed his racist past. Did he disavow it?
 
Party of first black president
Party with congressional black caucus
Party with black members (that's a biggie there)

You're stuck in the '50s.
Yea but the past still matters to the cancel folks. The word democrat has a “racist legacy”
 
So someone explain to me why Democrats want to tear down Confederate monuments if they are so racist.

Republicans :Democrats are the party of the Confederacy! Republicans freed the slaves!
Also Republicans: DONT TOUCH MY CONFEDERATE STATUES
 
Yea but the past still matters to the cancel folks. The word democrat has a “racist legacy”

It doesn’t matter to you, so quit whining about it.
 
Republicans :Democrats are the party of the Confederacy! Republicans freed the slaves!
Also Republicans: DONT TOUCH MY CONFEDERATE STATUES

As I said in another thread the other day, Republicans are insanely schizophrenic on their beliefs.
 
Woke mobs have nothing to do with this. You are the one who made the ludicrous claim and I merely pointed out that your Republican Party is the one who has now embraced racism. This is absolute fact. Are you so dumb you don’t realize that?

It's a shame you thought the above an adequate reply because you shan't be let off the hook. You stated that I was a right winger who is so "Gohmert-stupid" that I thought history somehow ended around 1970. I pointed out that woke mobs, aka democrats, aka 'left-wingers' were the ones that has assumed that history is fair game, long before 1970, and that ANY widely adopted social views couldn't excuse prior sin.

HENCE, it was your side of the ideological divide that established that regardless of what current institutions, businesses, leaders, etc. believed that the present must atone for the past by erasure of statutes, personas, institutional names and iconography.

You can't have it both ways squidgy. If names, icons, figures, etc. must be eradicated for their association with racism, then OF COURSE the democratic party, home of historical racism, apartheid, and "concentration camps" (as AOC would put it) must change its name and it's donkey (clearly now a racist symbol) must be eradicated.

The fact that today's Democrats no longer claim to be racist - their legacy cannot be erased without the erasure of their historical identity and symbolism.

Sword cuts both ways mate.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe this argument is still going on

The party of trump. The Lilly white party is calling democrats racist

How ludicrous is that?
 
I just don't understand how these people don't get it.

I've got an idea........

bdfd80ac89c1a99a6acfba435bd521ca.jpg
 
It's a shame you thought the above an adequate reply because you shan't be let off the hook. You stated that I was a right winger who is so "Gohmert-stupid" that I thought history somehow ended around 1970. I pointed out that woke mobs, aka democrats, aka 'left-wingers' were the ones that has assumed that history is fair game, long before 1970, and that ANY widely adopted social views couldn't excuse prior sin.

HENCE, it was your side of the ideological divide that established that regardless of what current institutions, businesses, leaders, etc. believed that the present must atone for the past by erasure of statutes, personas, institutional names and iconography.

You can't have it both ways squidgy. If names, icons, figures, etc. must be eradicated for their association with racism, then OF COURSE the democratic party, home of historical racism, apartheid, and "concentration camps" (as AOC would put it) must change its name and it's donkey (clearly now a racist symbol) must be eradicated.

The fact that today's Democrats no longer claim to be racist - their legacy cannot be erased without the erasure of their historical identity and symbolism.

Sword cuts both ways mate.

Twisted "logic" that means absolutely nothing.
The fact is that the Repubs are the party of racism today. End of story. Period.
 
Democrats proudly bought the battle flag of the confederacy to fly it. Changing it to liberals is not clever.

It's not clever to pretend that neoconfederates aren't Republicans.
 
Twisted "logic" that means absolutely nothing.
The fact is that the Repubs are the party of racism today. End of story. Period.

a) Repubs are not the party of racism, by and large.
b) Democrats are still the party of racism, by and large, and in a more modern form.
 
a) Repubs are not the party of racism, by and large.
b) Democrats are still the party of racism, by and large, and in a more modern form.

In what alternate universe do you live? Never mind, I answer. The FOX alternate universe.
 
In what alternate universe do you live? Never mind, I answer. The FOX alternate universe.

That is one of two things, either one of Putin's plants, or an actual American that Putin refers to as an indoctrinated useful idiot, and this country is full of them. Fox News After Dark should be eradicated by whatever means necessary. I will say that I think some of these useful idiots are willful. They have no problem with helping to bring about an authoritarian government that is setup to protect the corrupt from any legal process, in fact we've already seen how they are above the law, so when you hear the phrase "no one is above the law" you know it is bull****, I mean, please! They also help to protect their ill gotten gains, and their power. What these idiots, both useful and willful, will get out of this of course is nothing. When they eventually get tired of that nothing and start to complain, that's when the boot, or knee, will start pressing down on their neck, but by then it would be way too late.
I heartily recommend the Netflix Jeffery Epstein documentary if you want to see the privilege the powerful enjoy, and it's not just republicans. So while ultimately Epstein, and Weinstein got proper justice because of extraordinary pressure, which sadly now needs to be applied constantly, don't kid yourself, there are still plenty out there that are currently above the law.
What good is system that cannot enforce its own checks and balances? It's very evident that this system is broken.
 
Party of slavery.
Party of the KKK.
Party of Jim Crow.
Party that almost stopped the civil rights and voting act.
Party that opposed school integration.

But the Democrats' own standard, they should be CANCELLED.

Remind us, how long ago was that?
 
Remind us, how long ago was that?

The policies of each party evolve and change.

Republican's used to be conservative, family values.

Now, Trump trash followers.

As for Gohmert, I have seen him start trouble, attack Democrats, kiss Trump ass, but what the hell had he done for all Americans?
 
Only if he never disavowed his racist past. Did he disavow it?

I don't know if Sen. Byrd ever disavowed his racist past. Are you saying if he did then it's okay to have office buildings named after him? If any of the confederate statesmen of the past did too shouldn't their statues stay up?
 
Back
Top Bottom