• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats’ Interest in Midterm Elections Running Ahead of Republicans’

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
110,772
Reaction score
101,068
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Democrats’ Interest in Midterm Elections Running Ahead of Republicans’

im-13405

Voters received ballots at the City Hall polling station in San Francisco on Tuesday.

WSJ
6/7/18

Democrats are showing considerably more interest in the fall elections than are Republicans, and voters overall are signaling they would like control of Congress to flip to the Democrats, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds. The Democratic advantages come at the same time President Donald Trump’s approval rating has improved to 44%, one of its highest marks since he took office. Nearly two-thirds of voters are satisfied with the economy, one of the strongest showings since 2001. Some 53% of voters disapprove of Mr. Trump’s job performance, however. His approval rating is similar to that of Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Ronald Reagan at this point in their tenure, ahead of substantial losses in House races during their first midterm elections. The survey of 900 registered voters “points to a repudiation of Donald Trump, to the benefit of Democrats,” said Fred Yang, a Democratic pollster who conducted the survey with Republican Bill McInturff. For his part, Mr. McInturff said that poll numbers have been “bouncing around” in recent months, making it difficult to know with certainty where voters “are going to land.” Democrats need to pick up 23 seats in the House and two in the Senate to regain control of Congress.

The poll, conducted June 1-4, found that one issue that has moved off the main agenda in Washington—health care—still tops the agenda among many voters. Asked to pick the top issue from a list of seven that could decide their vote in November, 22% in the survey named health care, followed by the economy and jobs, at 19%. Democratic voters were far more likely to pick health care as the top issue than were Republicans. Independents were evenly divided between health care and the economy. Five months before the voting, Democrats are more focused on the campaign. Some 63% of Democrats said they are very interested in the midterms, compared with 47% of Republicans. Democrats’ interest in the race exceeds that of a comparable point in 2006—a year when the party picked up 31 House and six Senate seats in a midterm rout that then-Republican President George W. Bush called a “thumping.” The midterm elections could redirect Mr. Trump’s presidency, depending on the outcome. Should Congress flip to the Democrats, Mr. Trump would face considerably more resistance to his agenda, including the construction of a border wall and the confirmation of conservative-minded judges. Nearly half of voters, 48%, said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who promised to be a check on Mr. Trump, while 23% said they would be less likely to vote for that candidate.

Keep your eye on the prize ... flipping the GOP Congress on Tuesday, 6 November 2018.

Related: Tuesday Was a Good Day for Democrats
 
What are the Democrats running on? Higher taxes, gun control and impeachment? Do you think those are winners?

You know, most people do not brag about their ignorance. Why do you? If you want to know what democrats are running on, you should start with the national platform, which is, surprise, not what you describe: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform. What individual members are running on, for that you might check their websites. Hope this helps!
 
What are the Democrats running on? Higher taxes, gun control and impeachment? Do you think those are winners?

Their primary campaign tactic is going to be about how they hate Pres. Trump. "Platform?? Agenda?? Ideas?? We don't need any of those, we just need to get enough people to embrace the hate."
 
Familiar tone, but Democrats have no choice but to show an aggressive attitude about the midterms. Trying to capitalize on a few recent renewed wedge issues and of course going after Trump / Republicans as a means to appeal to Independents.
 
As Hillary Clinton would say" why Aren't I ahead by 50 points?"

I think the midterms would be a slam dunk if they could only get all their craziy idiots to STFU. And by that I mean t celebrities and annoying kooks like Elizabeth Warren. Of course they can't do that (how could they? )so it's possible they might not win.

Yesterday's turnout in CA was a complete embarassment for them . That 'resistance' movement isn't gaining any traction
 
You know, most people do not brag about their ignorance. Why do you? If you want to know what democrats are running on, you should start with the national platform, which is, surprise, not what you describe: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform. What individual members are running on, for that you might check their websites. Hope this helps!

I think he meant what issues get 90% of the attention . Most peole don't give a sh$t about actual issues.
 
Dems will fail to win the House and may actually lose ground in the Senate. You heard it here first.
 
Yesterday's turnout in CA was a complete embarassment for them .

Conservatives need to stop getting excited about this unfortunately. California counts their votes ridiculously slowly. Only about 2/3s have been counted so far and they won't be done for 2 or 3 weeks.

This is why people thought Romney and Trump won the popular vote at first in 2012 and 2016 before an extra million plus votes trickled in from California over the succeeding weeks.
 
You know, most people do not brag about their ignorance. Why do you? If you want to know what democrats are running on, you should start with the national platform, which is, surprise, not what you describe: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform. What individual members are running on, for that you might check their websites. Hope this helps!

Most people are smart enough to make a point. Those that aren't talk bull****. We know where you are.
 
Dems will fail to win the House and may actually lose ground in the Senate. You heard it here first.
If you change "will fail" to "may fail", I'll agree with you.

I don't see the Dems picking-up a net win in the Senate, and I think the House will be close. With the House, I won't be surprised either way it goes.
 
Most people are smart enough to make a point. Those that aren't talk bull****. We know where you are.

And the ones not talking bull**** aren't Trump or Trump supporters. BAAAAAAAAAHHHHH said the Trump sheep.
 
Most people are smart enough to make a point. Those that aren't talk bull****. We know where you are.

Bull****? I am not the one who spewed a made up talking point based on pure fiction. That was you. I am sorry you keep getting called on making **** up, but the best solution would be for you to stop making **** up, instead of crying about people pointing it out.
 
Bull****? I am not the one who spewed a made up talking point based on pure fiction. That was you. I am sorry you keep getting called on making **** up, but the best solution would be for you to stop making **** up, instead of crying about people pointing it out.

The Democrats don't want to raise taxes?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanellis/2018/03/09/democrats-release-tax-hike-plan/

They don't want more gun control?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...s_push_for_gun_control_as_campaign_issue.html

Democrats don't want to impeach President Trump?

https://www.vox.com/2018/4/30/17291016/democrats-impeachment-midterms

Nothing made up here. :lamo
 
As Hillary Clinton would say" why Aren't I ahead by 50 points?"

I think the midterms would be a slam dunk if they could only get all their craziy idiots to STFU. And by that I mean t celebrities and annoying kooks like Elizabeth Warren. Of course they can't do that (how could they? )so it's possible they might not win.

Yesterday's turnout in CA was a complete embarassment for them . That 'resistance' movement isn't gaining any traction

Nonsense.

They're on the ballot in all but one district, and where it was feared in places that because of the jungle primary there'd be two repubs as the only candidates, that didn't happen. And as for turnout? In six of the seven important districts controlled by the GOP, the GOP’s average vote share fell by anywhere from 2.5 to 6.9 points relative to 2016.

I'm not really sure what 'embarrassment' you're babbling about.
 
If you change "will fail" to "may fail", I'll agree with you.

I don't see the Dems picking-up a net win in the Senate, and I think the House will be close. With the House, I won't be surprised either way it goes.

Well, anything "may" happen. I used to be in a local forum like this for 13 years. The night before the election there was a prediction thread and I was one of only two people in the forum who predicted that Trump would win. I even offered an EC breakdown. They all laughed and jeered until the next day. I'll try to recover that post. BTW, they kicked me out of there last year after 50,000+ posts because I finally got sick of being called names by leftwingers who refused to actually debate the topic. I finally told one guy to F himself and they used that to kick me out. I guess they were just tired of an effective conservative voice in there.

FWIW, here was my post the night before the election:

Posted November 7, 2016

Trump- 280

Hillary- 258


Trump wins NC, IA AZ, GA, OH, ME2 and squeaks out FL & PA

Hill wins NV, CO, NM, NH & the rest of ME.





Just to see some heads explode. :lol
:
 
Last edited:
Democrats’ Interest in Midterm Elections Running Ahead of Republicans’

im-13405

Voters received ballots at the City Hall polling station in San Francisco on Tuesday.



Keep your eye on the prize ... flipping the GOP Congress on Tuesday, 6 November 2018.

Related: Tuesday Was a Good Day for Democrats
I saw it as a reasonable, but not spectacular day for the Dems.

Most positively, all their condidates seem to have gotten in. That's the biggest deal, of everything.

But in the negatives, a GOP Gubernatorial candidate get through. That will bring some additional GOP interest, and have GOP coat-tails effects in the House races. Additionally, Cali turnout estimates seem to be no higher than any other midterm primary, nor does it appear Hispanic turnout was any higher than usual.

If there was no Cali GOP Gubernatorial candidate, I would change my opinion from "reasonable" to "good". If in addition turnout was higher, I would change my opinion to "very good".
 
If you change "will fail" to "may fail", I'll agree with you.

I don't see the Dems picking-up a net win in the Senate, and I think the House will be close. With the House, I won't be surprised either way it goes.
Funny enough, the generic ballot has done another 180, and the Democrats now lead in three polls by 10-11+ again, while Trumps approval is back to around 38-42%.
 
Familiar tone, but Democrats have no choice but to show an aggressive attitude about the midterms. Trying to capitalize on a few recent renewed wedge issues and of course going after Trump / Republicans as a means to appeal to Independents.
Midterm elections are all about turning-out your base. Quite honestly, I believe I could see a "Stop Trump" message working very well to turn-out the base in some Democratic locales.

Now 2020 might be a bit different, but it may work in some 2018 districts. If the Dems learned anything from their winning a spate of recent special elections, it should be to target local candidates and messages to the locale. CF Doug Jones & Colin Lamb on one hand, and Danica Roem on the other.
 
I saw it as a reasonable, but not spectacular day for the Dems.

Most positively, all their condidates seem to have gotten in. That's the biggest deal, of everything.

But in the negatives, a GOP Gubernatorial candidate get through. That will bring some additional GOP interest, and have GOP coat-tails effects in the House races. Additionally, Cali turnout estimates seem to be no higher than any other midterm primary, nor does it appear Hispanic turnout was any higher than usual.

If there was no Cali GOP Gubernatorial candidate, I would change my opinion from "reasonable" to "good". If in addition turnout was higher, I would change my opinion to "very good".

We don't know California turnout yet. There are roughly only 2/3s of the votes counted and possibly even fewer since they changed the rules after 2016 to allow mailed in ballots to be counted if received by tomorrow and post marked by the election day. Because many ballots haven't even arrived yet, officials don't know exactly how many are left to count, but it's well over a million.
 
Conservatives need to stop getting excited about this unfortunately. California counts their votes ridiculously slowly. Only about 2/3s have been counted so far and they won't be done for 2 or 3 weeks.

This is why people thought Romney and Trump won the popular vote at first in 2012 and 2016 before an extra million plus votes trickled in from California over the succeeding weeks.
We don't know California turnout yet. There are roughly only 2/3s of the votes counted and possibly even fewer since they changed the rules after 2016 to allow mailed in ballots to be counted if received by tomorrow and post marked by the election day. Because many ballots haven't even arrived yet, officials don't know exactly how many are left to count, but it's well over a million.

True. But in terms of votes cast and the current count, it does not seem like Dems or Hispanics turned-out in any higher numbers than the previous midterms. If there's a heavier weighting to mail-in ballots this year though, you may be right as we finish counting them. But initial indications seem to not indicate a large change or swing, including in the number of mail-in ballots submitted.
 
True. But in terms of votes cast and the current count, it does not seem like Dems or Hispanics turned-out in any higher numbers than the previous midterms. If there's a heavier weighting to mail-in ballots this year though, you may be right as we finish counting them. But initial indications seem to not indicate a large change or swing, including in the number of mail-in ballots submitted.

If 2/3s of the ballots have been counted as I've seen some county officials estimate, that would put the final total at about 6.2 million. There are about 19 million registered voters in California. That would be 32% turnout. That's fairly higher than 2014 and equal to 2010.
 
You know, most people do not brag about their ignorance. Why do you? If you want to know what democrats are running on, you should start with the national platform, which is, surprise, not what you describe: https://www.democrats.org/party-platform. What individual members are running on, for that you might check their websites. Hope this helps!

So wait... are you saying that the Democrats 2018 platform is just their 2016 platform? :shock:

Do you think that will play well for incumbent, red-state Democrats?
 
Back
Top Bottom