- Joined
- May 3, 2005
- Messages
- 15,228
- Reaction score
- 569
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Well we all know that Earle the prosecutor in the Delay case is having a movie made about his crusade to "get Delay".
We all know that Earle has used this ongoing case as a fund raising tool.
We all know that Earle has discussed this ongoing case in public.
We all know that he was in such a rush and so desperate to indict Delay that he made the gross error of indicting him on a statute that wasn't even in effect.
Now a lot of you may not know, because you won't hear it on the main stream media, that when he realized he had indicted Delay for a crime that didn't exist he ran to another Grand Jury, not the one that issued the second indictment that was the third, you see the second told Earle to take a hike and refused to issue an indictment. So he ran to one that had just been convined that day and rushed through another indictment, again failing to list in that indictment exactly what Delay is accused of.
Now we find out that the foreman of the first Grand Jury had already made up his mind that Delay was guilty of something, anything just guilty BEFORE he heard any evidence.
As Austin station KLBJ said in their press release
http://www.590klbj.com/news.php?newsid=5774
THE FOREMAN OF THE TRAVIS COUNTY GRAND JURY THAT INDICTED CONGRESSMAN TOM DELAY SAYS HE FELT THERE WAS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY SURROUNDING DELAY, THE PAC TEXANS FOR A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY AND THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS LONG BEFORE HE WAS TAPPED TO SERVE ON THE GRAND JURY. WILLIAM GIBSON TOLD THE NEWSRADIO 590 KLBJ MORNING SHOW HE HIMSELF HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ADS CONCERNING THE TEXAS LEGISLATIVE RACES IN 2002.
What exactly did he say
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
"All this came out way before I was on the grand jury, these (ads)
were in your paper, in Austin paper, everyone else's paper, they was
flooding the market around here. But those were way before i ever
went on the grand jury and my decision was based upon those, not
what might have happened in the grand jury room."
So much for unbiased blind justice.
We all know that Earle has used this ongoing case as a fund raising tool.
We all know that Earle has discussed this ongoing case in public.
We all know that he was in such a rush and so desperate to indict Delay that he made the gross error of indicting him on a statute that wasn't even in effect.
Now a lot of you may not know, because you won't hear it on the main stream media, that when he realized he had indicted Delay for a crime that didn't exist he ran to another Grand Jury, not the one that issued the second indictment that was the third, you see the second told Earle to take a hike and refused to issue an indictment. So he ran to one that had just been convined that day and rushed through another indictment, again failing to list in that indictment exactly what Delay is accused of.
Now we find out that the foreman of the first Grand Jury had already made up his mind that Delay was guilty of something, anything just guilty BEFORE he heard any evidence.
As Austin station KLBJ said in their press release
http://www.590klbj.com/news.php?newsid=5774
THE FOREMAN OF THE TRAVIS COUNTY GRAND JURY THAT INDICTED CONGRESSMAN TOM DELAY SAYS HE FELT THERE WAS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY SURROUNDING DELAY, THE PAC TEXANS FOR A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY AND THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS LONG BEFORE HE WAS TAPPED TO SERVE ON THE GRAND JURY. WILLIAM GIBSON TOLD THE NEWSRADIO 590 KLBJ MORNING SHOW HE HIMSELF HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ADS CONCERNING THE TEXAS LEGISLATIVE RACES IN 2002.
What exactly did he say
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
"All this came out way before I was on the grand jury, these (ads)
were in your paper, in Austin paper, everyone else's paper, they was
flooding the market around here. But those were way before i ever
went on the grand jury and my decision was based upon those, not
what might have happened in the grand jury room."
So much for unbiased blind justice.