• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Defensive gun use thread

Yeah, another win for the childish types. :D
View attachment 67502670
Average 911 response time: 3+ minutes
Average time to draw my 1911: 1.5 seconds
Right_to_Carry%2C_timeline.gif
 

Our resident anti-civil right gun control proponents would have this woman call 911 and hope that she doesn’t get killed or grievously injured in the time it takes police to arrive.

Gun control is pro-criminal.
 
If NRA folks weren't being dishonest they would have no argument. See how easy it is to push false narratives? :D
Your assertion noted.
 
Not mentioned specifically, but they absolutely are most of the equation. Your snippet solely uses "individuals in possesion of a gun" for the metric. Law-abiding concealed carriers don't suddenly start visiting high-crime areas or go looking for trouble, so they are way less likely to fall into those statistics.
Your assumption noted.
Gangsters aren't allowed to defend themselves? Seems you're being hypocritical.
 
So, is this your approach? Begging for your life?

strafzeige-mit-einer-waffe-auf-eine-person-auf-den-knien_318-56213.jpg
Needs more context. Under specific circumstances ummm yes.

Is that perhaps your own gun being pointed at you?

I'd say a keen awareness of your surroundings is more important to your safety than a shoot out with a criminal. What say you?
 
Needs more context. Under specific circumstances ummm yes.

Is that perhaps your own gun being pointed at you?

I'd say a keen awareness of your surroundings is more important to your safety than a shoot out with a criminal. What say you?
How many people walk about in Condition White with their face buried in a cell phone?

Minimum should be Condition Yellow. Orange or Red if in certain parts of town.

My question for you is why you would deprive yourself of choices by voluntarily limiting your ability to defend yourself or your family?
 
How many people walk about in Condition White with their face buried in a cell phone?

Minimum should be Condition Yellow. Orange or Red if in certain parts of town.

My question for you is why you would deprive yourself of choices by voluntarily limiting your ability to defend yourself or your family?
My question for you - How much combat experience do you have? Seems you're buying into a bunch of wannabe carrying propaganda put out by the gun lobbying crowd. Never heard any of those terms used n the military, let alone in 'Nam.
 
Gangsters aren't allowed to defend themselves?
They can defend themselves all they want. But if they are prohibited persons they can't do it with a firearm. Not legally, at least. But of course they carry illegally anyway, which puts the law abiding at risk. That's why we carry.
 
How many people walk about in Condition White with their face buried in a cell phone?
How many people walk around in Condition Orange, actively seeking a Red Condition?
Minimum should be Condition Yellow. Orange or Red if in certain parts of town.

My question for you is why you would deprive yourself of choices by voluntarily limiting your ability to defend yourself or your family?
I don't. At the point of Condition Orange, I'm smart enough to allow my feet to bring the condition back to Yellow/White.

My questions to you: Are you one of those combative individuals that actively toe the line between Orange and Red?

Wouldn't you and your family be safer by removing yourselves from an "Orange" situation, relying on your gun as a last ditch effort?
 
They can defend themselves all they want. But if they are prohibited persons they can't do it with a firearm. Not legally, at least. But of course they carry illegally anyway, which puts the law abiding at risk. That's why we carry.
You always abide by the speed limit laws, never go through a yellow turning to red, passing on the right 'cause someone's making a left hand turn and you can't be bothered to wait? Law abiding my little Buddhist ass. You carry cause you're scared my friend, and you've bought into the propaganda the gun lobby puts out. Own it and you'll be better off as a human being. ;)
 
My question for you - How much combat experience do you have? Seems you're buying into a bunch of wannabe carrying propaganda put out by the gun lobbying crowd. Never heard any of those terms used n the military, let alone in 'Nam.

Maybe your military experience over 50 years ago was more focused on shutter speeds and apertures.
 
You always abide by the speed limit laws, never go through a yellow turning to red, passing on the right 'cause someone's making a left hand turn and you can't be bothered to wait? Law abiding my little Buddhist ass. You carry cause you're scared my friend, and you've bought into the propaganda the gun lobby puts out. Own it and you'll be better off as a human being. ;)

Because disobeying a traffic law is exactly the same as assaulting someone with intent of great bodily injury.

Buddha says: When losing an argument badly, define terms into being meaningless.

Good job. Within your rationale, there are no longer such things as law abiding citizens.
 
You always abide by the speed limit laws, never go through a yellow turning to red, passing on the right 'cause someone's making a left hand turn and you can't be bothered to wait? Law abiding my little Buddhist ass. You carry cause you're scared my friend, and you've bought into the propaganda the gun lobby puts out. Own it and you'll be better off as a human being. ;)
🙄
 
How many people walk around in Condition Orange, actively seeking a Red Condition?

I don't. At the point of Condition Orange, I'm smart enough to allow my feet to bring the condition back to Yellow/White.

My questions to you: Are you one of those combative individuals that actively toe the line between Orange and Red?

Wouldn't you and your family be safer by removing yourselves from an "Orange" situation, relying on your gun as a last ditch effort?
Absolutely. The first rule of carrying is deescalation. Unfortunately, sometimes violent criminals aren’t willing to let you deescalate.
 
My question for you - How much combat experience do you have? Seems you're buying into a bunch of wannabe carrying propaganda put out by the gun lobbying crowd. Never heard any of those terms used n the military, let alone in 'Nam.
Those terms aren’t military. They are just a way to denote awareness of your surroundings.

And to your first question. Much more than one year in country. When you do a 20 year career during the GWOT, you tend to deploy more than once.
 
Those terms aren’t military. They are just a way to denote awareness of your surroundings.
Right, so, in other words, just made up bs terminology. ;)
And to your first question. Much more than one year in country. When you do a 20 year career during the GWOT, you tend to deploy more than once.
"In country" doesn't answer my question. There were lots of support personnel who were never in combat, no matter how many years they served or were deployed. In fact, iIrc the ratio was something like 10 to one, support personnel to grunts.
 
Right, so, in other words, just made up bs terminology. ;)
Military terminology is "made up" too. It wasn't handed down from the immortal Buddha.
"In country" doesn't answer my question. There were lots of support personnel who were never in combat, no matter how many years they served or were deployed. In fact, iIrc the ratio was something like 10 to one, support personnel to grunts.

I wonder what the ratio of Air Force photographers to essential support personnel is...?
 

Our resident anti-civil right gun control proponents would have this woman call 911 and hope that she doesn’t get killed or grievously injured in the time it takes police to arrive.

Gun control is pro-criminal.
The problem with your rhetoric is the nation has become quite permissive in carry laws and firearm ownership, but firearm violence doesn't seem to have abated much. Based on the number of firearms in private hands the woman should literally have a pistol in each hand and an AR in the closet.

Perhaps if 'this woman' had and ADT sign in her front yard, on her door and a rather husky member of the canine family protesting any knock on the door she wouldn't need to have a firearm in the house her children or one of their friends could play with or take to school.... ✌️

FYI, I carried the 1911a1 when a M60 gunner, admire a well maintained one, friend has a Kimber. However, I prefer my XD45 double stack... ;)
 


























Stay safe and unvictimized folks....have a great weekend.
 
Where are you collaborationists? You who would choose to kneel before criminals and give up your rights in favor of the lowest scum on the planet.
 
Where are you collaborationists? You who would choose to kneel before criminals and give up your rights in favor of the lowest scum on the planet.
They are busy putting up yard signs for the hair sniffer in chief, creepy Joe.
 
Back
Top Bottom