Debunked?

[sKiTzo]

There were nearly 200,000 more votes cast than there are voters in Pennsylvania.....but this has been "debunked".

The following is the debunking from Snopes, but (correct me if I'm wrong) it doesn't debunk it by any stretch of imagination. What they do is they attempt to confuse the reader with a bunch of malarkey so that when they finish reading it they shrug their shoulders and chalk it up as "debunked". In the end they just say it's "incomplete data" because there are still a few counties that haven't submitted results. When they do though, it's not going to lessen the margin between voters and votes cast, It's just going to add more of both:

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.
The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States.

However, the Pennsylvania Department of State (DoS) issued a statement noting that the numbers obtained from the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system by Ryan were not accurate because they were based on incomplete data. As the DoS observed, “a few counties have not completed uploading their vote histories,” and that those as-yet- unreported numbers “would account for a significant number of voters”


Then in Michigan (where Trump cleverly forced the auto industry back from China but still lost) you have clearly documented evidence (with video proof and hundreds of signed affidavits) that democrat minion election officials told workers to leave - that they were done counting for the day, and as soon as they left they brought out thousands of ballots and continued counting through the night (in secret). THAT HAPPENED. Any judge that after being presented with this evidence, says there is no evidence of fraud should be investigated for incompetence or dereliction of duty. I always thought that judges were there to make decisions on minor discrepancies but mostly had to adhere to the written law. Why have rules that when clear violations occur, a judge can just say it didn't happen?? If kicking people out of the counting so they can then count mystery ballots all night long in secret doesn't stop that state's results from being certified, then I guess the USA is now no better than some shady banana republic. Truly sad.

 

[Redress]

Moderator's Warning:

Please keep CT stuff to the CT forum. Thank you.

 

[FlaMike13]

There were nearly 200,000 more votes cast than there are voters in Pennsylvania.....but this has been "debunked".

The following is the debunking from Snopes, but (correct me if I'm wrong) it doesn't debunk it by any stretch of imagination. What they do is they attempt to confuse the reader with a bunch of malarkey so that when they finish reading it they shrug their shoulders and chalk it up as "debunked". In the end they just say it's "incomplete data" because there are still a few counties that haven't submitted results. When they do though, it's not going to lessen the margin between voters and votes cast, It's just going to add more of both:

However, the Pennsylvania Department of State (DoS) issued a statement noting that the numbers obtained from the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system by Ryan were not accurate because they were based on incomplete data. As the DoS observed, “a few counties have not completed uploading their vote histories,” and that those as-yet- unreported numbers “would account for a significant number of voters”


Then in Michigan (where Trump cleverly forced the auto industry back from China but still lost) you have clearly documented evidence (with video proof and hundreds of signed affidavits) that democrat minion election officials told workers to leave - that they were done counting for the day, and as soon as they left they brought out thousands of ballots and continued counting through the night (in secret). THAT HAPPENED. Any judge that after being presented with this evidence, says there is no evidence of fraud should be investigated for incompetence or dereliction of duty. I always thought that judges were there to make decisions on minor discrepancies but mostly had to adhere to the written law. Why have rules that when clear violations occur, a judge can just say it didn't happen?? If kicking people out of the counting so they can then count mystery ballots all night long in secret doesn't stop that state's results from being certified, then I guess the USA is now no better than some shady banana republic. Truly sad.

Fake News!!!!!

 

[RabidAlpaca]

You lost, get over it. If you have real evidence of fraud, present it. Trump's lawyers have failed to do so in court some 60 times now so I don't think you'll be able to.

 

[HonestJoe]

The following is the debunking from Snopes, but (correct me if I'm wrong) it doesn't debunk it by any stretch of imagination. What they do is they attempt to confuse the reader with a bunch of malarkey so that when they finish reading it they shrug their shoulders and chalk it up as "debunked". In the end they just say it's "incomplete data" because there are still a few counties that haven't submitted results. When they do though, it's not going to lessen the margin between voters and votes cast, It's just going to add more of both:

I'll give you the benefit of doubt here and assume that you are honestly just confused but the issue seems very simple to me.

There are two places that the total number of votes cast were reported, presumably for different purposes. At the point in time these figures were captured, one of those sources was complete but the other hadn't been populated with all the data and so there was a roughly 200,000 mismatch between the two totals. Once all the data was updated though, that mismatch would obviously disappear (because they're essentially counting the same thing).

 

[sKiTzo]

I'll give you the benefit of doubt here and assume that you are honestly just confused but the issue seems very simple to me.

There are two places that the total number of votes cast were reported, presumably for different purposes. At the point in time these figures were captured, one of those sources was complete but the other hadn't been populated with all the data and so there was a roughly 200,000 mismatch between the two totals. Once all the data was updated though, that mismatch would obviously disappear (because they're essentially counting the same thing).

So with a discrepancy of 170,830 more votes than voters before data for the remaining counties was collected, The remaining counties would submit theirs with 170,830 more voters than votes and it will come out even. Oh, okay!

 

[Dragonfly]

 

[NoBull]

Trump spent 4 years being the a hole he is and you question why he lost????

I have observed this individual for 45 years...I was dumbfounded that he could convince people to vote for him him in 2016.. Voters got a taste and rejected him 4 years later..no surprise... Should not be for any self respecting thinking individual