- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,719
- Reaction score
- 35,498
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Zyphlin said:"Who's got the biggest dick"
alex said:I would be very interested in the answer to this question. Provide a link please.
(LOL)
Kelzie said:I do!! Oh, no wait. Crap. Man, have I got a set of ovaries though.:lol:
cnredd said:I'm going to need you to provide a source for this claim....
Kelzie said:I...umm...no wait I'll find one. Will truthout.org work?
cnredd said:The whole Lakewood Phone Directory?....cnredd runs away while ducking....
galenrox said:What pisses me off the most is when new people come on the site, and their first thread is "**** You America!" or something along those lines, and then they're suprised and indignant that everyone's not like, "Yeah, of course!!"
Kelzie said:Yeah but I love reading your responses to it, so I'm okay with that one.:lol:
I hate people that talk about faulty posts with faulty logic. Just FYI, no one can call anyone on the issue of how many deaths the Iraqis have suffered. Because nobody really knows how many. What's more, the people that argue that US troops did not kill that many, do not have a leg to stand on because the very people they are defending do not keep records of the Iraqi's they killed. Or they do, but won't release that information. Which is the same thing in the end. So, you can't call someone on something with proof you don't have. Merely saying someone elses source is faulty does not prove your assertion is true.Originally posted by Zyphlin
Annoys me to no end when someone states something, the next poster points out that thier flat out wrong, and then the person responds with something along the lines of "Yeah, well, doesn't matter i was wrong becuase um...you were wrong about this this and this".
Example would be the recent stuff with the 100,000 civilians "killed" so far. This gets posted often. People generally point out its highly faulty data right after and basically a well calculated lie by the left. In 2 different threads the post directly after this basically goes "Yeah, well...bush lied about x, y, z".
Yes...lieing about x, y, and z are bad things. Bring that up in a post. That's very good. However that is not an explanation for why you threw faulty data out there and get called on it. Just freaking own up to your mistakes, accept that, and then put out the other things.
I agree with you. Why don't you go count how many times I've had to put up with this kind of bullshit. I think I lead the leage when it comes to people not responding to the premise of my proposition. They would rather react to something I didn't say or just interject something totally irrelevent. Which I have been guilty of myself.Originally posted by Zyphlin
This is also prevalent in the 9/11 inside job thread with people responding to teacher. Teacher posts something that disproves or gives an explanation for something they post. So instead of commenting on what teacher stated, they go "Yeah?! Well...um...explain this then!?". You want him to explain something else, GREAT! But first at least freaking comment on what he already pointed out for you.
Billo_Really said:I hate people that talk about faulty posts with faulty logic. Just FYI, no one can call anyone on the issue of how many deaths the Iraqis have suffered. Because nobody really knows how many. What's more, the people that argue that US troops did not kill that many, do not have a leg to stand on because the very people they are defending do not keep records of the Iraqi's they killed. Or they do, but won't release that information. Which is the same thing in the end. So, you can't call someone on something with proof you don't have. Merely saying someone elses source is faulty does not prove your assertion is true.
Because *****s like you don't have the balls to admit when your wrong. If you think you do, state the posts where you have.Originally posted by cnredd:
If what you say is true then why did you post this thread?
Thank you for clearing that up. Maybe I was a little too paranoid.Originally posted by Zyphlin:
Hey billo, countrary to what you may think the world or this forum doesn't revolve around you. My earlier statement about stating the deaths wasn't about you, actually you weren't anywhere on my head about that. It was due to another poster on a thread i can't even remember now, a low post count guy like me. In that thread he DID present the numbers as if it was some kind of fact, quoting that source as his "Fact", which was my probelm. Its not that I know for a Fact how many deaths there are, but *I* DO know for a fact that that number is not a definite concrete number that should be taken as if its the word of christ himself. Also...that was simply an example for a type of thing, way to harp on it instead of the actual thing the example was refering to.
So your saying they fought for a right I'm not allowed to use? Even if it is used with the intent of saving their lives?Originally posted by Zyphlin:
"People are fighting and dieing and have faught and died for your right to critize the government....SO don't you go critizing the government"
Check out Post #29 on the "Liberals Hate America" thread if you want to see pictures showing the soldiers in Iraq in a good light. I have other posts that show this as well. I'm not as one-sided as others would hope.Originally posted by Zyphlin:
Yes, i hate that people can be very very overly critical of the government without pointing to anything good ever.
I'm not sure what your point is. Could you explain in more detail.Originally posted by Zyphlin:
Billo....read my posts...for the love of god.
That quote you posted and asked me a question about. It was put in there as once again, AN EXAMPLE. Look how i started most of my posts that have the tactic I dislike. I have used a quote of the basic tactic. The one i don't like is using that logic right there. I agree with you, I think the way people put it across sometimes are stupid.
Actually take time to perhaps read the entire post of someone instead of looking at bullet snippets to pull out and insult
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?