• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

COVID Vaccinated Continue to Report Bizarre, Horrific Debilitations a Year Later

No one knows how many lives were saved. The pandemic gradually died down and newer variants have been less lethal. So that accounts for at least part of the decline in death rates.

The propaganda says the vaccines are safe and effective and ended the pandemic. But there is no science that supports that.

NO ONE KNOWS.

Yep.

We don't know there was a drastic downturn in deaths as the vaccine rolled out. Right?

We don't know there was a period where the unvaccinated died at a rate far higher than the vaccinated. Right?
 
They felt it was an emergency and they had to try, regardless of possible risks.
The emergency did not warrant taking unnecessary risks, and there was massive oversight of the entire process. People aren't stupid. If there were possible long term risks, the vaccines would not have been approved for human use.
 
I asked because you meant something and you use the term people normally do.
I can't really parse out your sentence, but I remember that you asked me two questions and I answered them honestly.

But as I said, I didn't really think you would follow. When it comes to language, I can be downright esoteric.
 
I can't really parse out your sentence,
Why? What's wrong with you?
but I remember that you asked me two questions and I answered them honestly.
doubtful

But as I said, I didn't really think you would follow. When it comes to language, I can be downright esoteric.
No I think you mask incompetence with overly verbose language.
 
The emergency did not warrant taking unnecessary risks, and there was massive oversight of the entire process. People aren't stupid. If there were possible long term risks, the vaccines would not have been approved for human use.
You have no clue and neither does anyone else if there are long-term risks.

It was approved because the government spent billions on it.
 
"The past year has been jam-packed with specialist appointments, ER visits, hospital stays, prescription costs, insurance frustrations, awful symptoms, an unbelievable amount of water retention pounds that had to be medically removed, and the brutal side effects of the Prednisone steroid treatment. I’ve been prescribed a high dosage of Prednisone for the past year. A steroid that is alarmingly known by its nickname, the “Devil’s TicTacs”, because of its 150 known terrible side effects. However, after a year of battling both the physical and emotional side effects of Prednisone, it’s now apparent I am steroid resistant. Research suggests that only 5-10% of adults with MCD are steroid-resistant. Since I’m ending steroid treatment, my nephrologist is switching me to an immunosuppressant treatment plan. Kidney transplant patients are normally prescribed this immunosuppressant medication, Tacrolimus. I haven’t started it, and not sure I will because of the damaging side effects."

Yep. Sounds like placebo effect. You are insane.
Or its just plain BS.

I am a medical provider. I have now thousands of patients that have been vaccinated. I have seen ONE.. reaction that was concerning.. after an initial vaccination, a patient got SOB and had tachycardia. She was not given a second dose and has not had any further trouble.

Sorry.. butI think if thousands of people were getting injured from the vaccine.. I would see it. Especially since I and all my staff are vaccinated.
 
If scientists had a good understanding of how cells work, they could cure and prevent cancer. They can't.
My uncle was diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer in 2010.
He is still alive and kicking due to scientific breakthroughs.
A patient with metastatic cancer like his.. diagnosed in 1998.. would have been told he had 6 months to a year.

Shush.
 
You wouldn't be laughing if one of these people with such severe reactions were from your family. SMH
You are aware that reports of adverse reactions to VAERS cannot be verified? VAERS is clear on this:
Quote; "Specifically, a report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event"
 
I've read science that says otherwise.

So it's one of those "my cherry picked sources against your cherry picked sources". That's why I'm not going to provide a link to anything and if you want to debate about it you win it's over.
Show us your science. Should be simple enough.
 
I think you have misguided blame. I would look to Mr Science himself ... Fauci, for sending mixed messages and misinformation!
Again, Fauci, like every other expert in the field, was playing catch-up with an entirely novel disease, never before encountered. Obviously advice and opinion changes as knowledge grows over time.
 
If scientists had a good understanding of how cells work, they could cure and prevent cancer. They can't.
As a retired cytopathologist who probably forgot more about cells and their function than you clearly know, I find your ignorance astonishing. Oh, and by the way, we have a vaccine against cervical cancer. This was achieved by scientists who, according to you, have no good understanding of "how cells work".
 
I think you just making excuses for why you won't address the point.
If only you could state your point, in clear words, I'll be happy to address it again. Whatever it takes to help you see my position.
Suffering from temporary illiteracy seems to be very common symptom of this
Temporary illiteracy?

You say the oddest things.

(And what is 'this'?)
 
Quote; "Specifically, a report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event"
I think they are like the affidavits, sworn by the hundreds by Trump supporters, of election irregularities.

Not saying no one has a bad reaction, but we're pretty sure that number is miniscule.
 
It's a waste of time to try and prove devotees' religion wrong.

So no. If you wanted to see it you would have by now.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't exist, except within the minds of rightwing religious devotees.

But I'd be happy to examine any you'd like to point at.
 
Again, Fauci, like every other expert in the field, was playing catch-up with an entirely novel disease, never before encountered. Obviously advice and opinion changes as knowledge grows over time.
Well, then since you give the "experts in the field" a break, then you should give Trump a break.
 
Let us know when it does in the case of Covid and vaccines.
We still don't know everything about Covid and the vaccines. Thing is the anything negative that is showing up is getting pooh poohed!
 
You are aware that reports of adverse reactions to VAERS cannot be verified? VAERS is clear on this:
Quote; "Specifically, a report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event"
and if someone has an adverse event and wasn't vaccinated does not mean that the vaccine would have prevented the adverse event.
 
Back
Top Bottom