- Joined
- Feb 24, 2014
- Messages
- 33,935
- Reaction score
- 26,642
- Location
- Oceania
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Court rules Subway sandwiches too sugary to meet legal definition of ‘bread’
Ireland’s highest court isn’t sweet on tax breaks for footlongs. The country’s Supreme Court ruled that the starch used in Subway sandwiches is too sugary to meet the definition of “bread” — …
nypost.com
Ireland’s highest court isn’t sweet on tax breaks for footlongs.
The country’s Supreme Court ruled that the starch used in Subway sandwiches is too sugary to meet the definition of “bread” — a legal distinction that would have saved the firm some dough.
In deciding whether to give the fast-food chain a tax break for serving a “staple” food item, the five-judge panel ruled that the bread’s sugar-to-flour content is roughly five times too high to qualify, according to the Irish Independent.
Welp. There you have it. If it ain't bread, then what is it?