They have no problem hiring a known terrorist but they voted against giving the scumbag emeritus status?
University of Illinois denies Bill Ayers emeritus status - chicagotribune.com
In a very unusual move, University of Illinois trustees Thursday denied giving emeritus status to controversial retired professor William Ayers.
The vote, at a U. of I. board meeting in Urbana, was unanimous and came after a passionate speech by board chair Christopher Kennedy, who invoked the 1968 assassination of his father, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, in saying that he was voting his conscience.
The other trustees, without comment, also voted against the appointment.
Ayers, the Vietnam War-era radical, had been an education faculty member at UIC since 1987. He retired effective Aug. 31 and then sought the emeritus faculty status, a largely honorific title that includes some benefits such as library privileges.
Ayers served his time in jail, yes?
So then why is this a problem, I dont see a reason to call him a terrorist. Is he currently engaged in any violent activities?
Ayers served his sentence. Unless he is currently engaging in terrorist activities, you're only name-calling because you disagree with his views.yeah it would be almost as unfair as calling Ted Bundy or Charlie Manson murderers or Ivan Boesky a scam artist
Ayers served his sentence. Unless he is currently engaging in terrorist activities, you're only name-calling because you disagree with his views.
Ayers served his sentence. Unless he is currently engaging in terrorist activities, you're only name-calling because you disagree with his views.
Yeah, I do. Again, the guy has served his sentence. If you dont like his views, that's fine. But he DOES have the right to express them, regardless of what they are. Calling him a terrorist is stupid because he ISN'T a terrorist. It'd be like me calling you a pedophile; it's stupid because it isn't (I trust) true. Unless you can show there is current evidence that he is currently involved in terrorist activities, he's a radical but not a terrorist.He dedicated a book to an assassin.
You really think this is a simple disagreement of views?
Ayers served his sentence. Unless he is currently engaging in terrorist activities, you're only name-calling because you disagree with his views.
Oh come on, Ayers just dedicated a book to the man that shot his father. Whats the big deal?
/sarcasm
The better question is how did that piece of trash get to be a professor in the first place?
Yeah, I do. Again, the guy has served his sentence. If you dont like his views, that's fine. But he DOES have the right to express them, regardless of what they are. Calling him a terrorist is stupid because he ISN'T a terrorist. It'd be like me calling you a pedophile; it's stupid because it isn't (I trust) true. Unless you can show there is current evidence that he is currently involved in terrorist activities, he's a radical but not a terrorist.
Ayers served his sentence. Unless he is currently engaging in terrorist activities, you're only name-calling because you disagree with his views.
What was his sentence for all the terrorist acts he committed?Yeah, I do. Again, the guy has served his sentence.
If you dont like his views, that's fine. But he DOES have the right to express them, regardless of what they are.
Calling him a terrorist is stupid because he ISN'T a terrorist.
It'd be like me calling you a pedophile;
it's stupid because it isn't (I trust) true.
So by your logic Ted Bundy is not a serial killer, John Wayne Gacy, Jr is not a serial killer and John Couey is not a pedophile child murdering rapist because they are not currently doing those things.Unless you can show there is current evidence that he is currently involved in terrorist activities,
he's a radical but not a terrorist.
Yeah, I do. Again, the guy has served his sentence. If you dont like his views, that's fine. But he DOES have the right to express them, regardless of what they are. Calling him a terrorist is stupid because he ISN'T a terrorist. It'd be like me calling you a pedophile; it's stupid because it isn't (I trust) true. Unless you can show there is current evidence that he is currently involved in terrorist activities, he's a radical but not a terrorist.
Let me explain something to the less fortunate among us. Once a Terrorist always a Terrorist.
The fact a school would give that piece of **** a job to teach or let him anywhere near that school is unconscionable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?