- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,779
- Reaction score
- 1,079
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
He can CALL him anything he wants, I'm simply pointing out that it's an incorrect title.Using your logic, doesn't texmaster have the right to call the person a terrorist if that is his view. Even if you think he is a reformed terrorist.
I have no idea and it's irrelevant.What was his sentence for all the terrorist acts he committed?
He served his sentence for what he did.Its not really a matter a of disliking his views. Its disliking what he did.
Acts that he has served a prison sentence for.He committed many terrorist acts in the US. So he is a terrorist.
Dont be deliberately obtuse, you know what I mean.You do realize pedophilia is a sexual attraction to prepubescent kids, not something that happens because mean ol catholic church doesn't let their priests marry.So that means you do not have to convicted of child rape/molestation to be one nor is it something that goes away unless they found a cure for it.
They are convicted criminals, serving their sentences.So by your logic Ted Bundy is not a serial killer, John Wayne Gacy, Jr is not a serial killer and John Couey is not a pedophile child murdering rapist because they are not currently doing those things.
Why?The fact a school would give that piece of **** a job to teach or let him anywhere near that school is unconscionable.
True, though I contend you implied it further back.#1 I never called him a terrorist. You need to be clear on whom you are replying to.
He doesnt have to.#2 He never ever expressed any regret for his efforts in targeting buildings for detonation.
Again, he doesnt HAVE to show regret. He engaged in illegal activities, was caught, served his time, and now he's out working.This guy isn't a liberal where points can be argued. He's a far left extremist dedicating books to assassins and expressing no regret for past illegal activities. This is way beyond politics.