• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution

Your Star said:
I went high to the Museum down here a few months back, spent about 5 hours there, could have spent another 8
Click to expand...

D@mn, but that dyslexia of mine keeps striking.
 
American said:
Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution « CBS Las Vegas



Now this isn't all Obama's fault, but he does symbolize the ideology that seems to hate Constitutional limits, and thinks this country was suppose to be about do-gooders forcing everyone else by legal means to do their idea of good. This has only served to reduce personal freedoms and personal prosperity.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't have been "controversial" if it was Bush instead of Obama in the picture.
 
SLAMRAAM said:
It wouldn't have been "controversial" if it was Bush instead of Obama in the picture.
Click to expand...


Really/ You don't think people like Glenn Beck, Bill O'Rielly, Anne Coulter wouldn't have hopped on that gravy train...
 
He can paint anything he wants...

doesnt mean hes not mr facepalm to half the country.
 
barbarian_style said:
I looked all over that painting and can not find where the patriot act is?
Click to expand...

I'm gonna tell you a secret. The Patriot Act, overturning Miranda Rights or overturning Posse Comitatus, is not violating the constitution since these are not in the Constitution.
 
American said:
Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution « CBS Las Vegas



Now this isn't all Obama's fault, but he does symbolize the ideology that seems to hate Constitutional limits, and thinks this country was suppose to be about do-gooders forcing everyone else by legal means to do their idea of good. This has only served to reduce personal freedoms and personal prosperity.
Click to expand...

I think that the paniting just depicts the views of the radical right-wing in this country who cannot effectively refute the pluses of having Obama in the white house. The 'doo-badders' of this country equally used the legislature to bring this country to ruin and now the pendulum is swinging the other way. This fallacy that personal freedoms and personal prosperity are being reduced is just a further example of the hubris by which the extremist right-wing faction operates: there's nothing to validate declaratives like that so they become buz phrases and talking points that are simply designed to hide the damages that the right-wing has done and what results when people try anad do something about it.
 
Matt Foley said:
I'm gonna tell you a secret. The Patriot Act, ...bur bur blah blah neener neener..., is not violating the constitution since these are not in the Constitution.:spin:
Click to expand...

Right, the patriot act is not in the constitution, it was used to step on your rights within the constitution. You are either with us or without us, so you going to give up some of your constitutional rights?

You are a real patriot to give up your constitutional rights act. If you don't want to give up your constitutional rights your a terrorist and just strip them anyways.
 
Last edited:
The piece will be historically curious.

If we ever make it that far.
 
barbarian_style said:
Right, the patriot act is not in the constitution, it was used to step on your rights within the constitution. You are either with us or without us, so you going to give up some of your constitutional rights?

You are a real patriot to give up your constitutional rights act. If you don't want to give up your constitutional rights your a terrorist and just strip them anyways.
Click to expand...

Did you just edit out Miranda Rights and Posse Comitatus out of my statement? How many times have we heard you braindead Libertarians use those 2 things and the Constitution in the same sentence? What do you morons even know about the Constitution? How many things in Article I, Section 8, do you Anarchist morons oppose! You are just out of synch with the Constitution as a Communist, so shut up.
 
Matt Foley said:
:boohoo: Did you just edit out Miranda Rights and Posse Comitatus out of my statement? How many times have we heard you braindead Libertarians use those 2 things and the Constitution in the same sentence? What do you morons even know about the Constitution? How many things in Article I, Section 8, do you Anarchist morons oppose! You are just out of synch with the Constitution as a Communist, so shut up.
Click to expand...



So your argument over what I say is name calling? ::naughty

Good argument, many here have also tried to use that as a valid point, it isn't.

Congratulations! :applaud
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom