Todzilla
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 85
- Location
- In the woods
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
The feminists and their partners the government have vetoed that idea.Why is that legal and moral concept so difficult for some people to grasp?
One or more consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want to with each other. They don't need my permission or that of anyone else.
The feminists and their partners the government have vetoed that idea.
The feminists and their partners the government have vetoed that idea.
Proving consent is the tricky part.
lol...heya, Hawk, long time, bud. Just wanted to check to make sure I'm reading this right. I'd never have guessed that Trump and the feminist are in cahoots.
Proving consent is the tricky part.
Why is that legal and moral concept so difficult for some people to grasp?
One or more consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want to with each other. They don't need my permission or that of anyone else.
Back when we had standards, the argument was that certain activities degrade society as a whole. Of course that ship has already sailed.
The feminists and their partners the government have vetoed that idea.
Why is that legal and moral concept so difficult for some people to grasp?
One or more consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want to with each other. They don't need my permission or that of anyone else.
Do you believe that villifying homosexuality is healthy for society as a whole?
I agree, especially with incest among consenting adults. Father and son denied the ability to "marry" is discrimination of sexual orientation. At the very least, state marriage is imposing its concept of sexual compatibility in order for two people to enjoy the civil privileges of what we call "state marriage".
What the state defines as sexual compatibility should have nothing to do with the endowment of state "marital" benefits.
If the son is over 18 and is fully consenting, why is it your or my business?
It depends on how you define vilify.
If the son is over 18 and is fully consenting, why is it your or my business?
This one specific example is troubling to me. Theoretically, the father has held some power over the son for at least 18 years and could have caused all kinds of mental issues making the consent shady at best.
I personally feel marriage should have no definition of gender, age (assuming adults), race, etc. I don't know that the state should be encouraging any marriage, but whatever rules or rewards it applies should be done equally.
Opening it to absolutely anything is a bit troublesome for me, however. There is no great way to judge mental capacities in some situations.
How can we be so sure that it's fully consenting? Does a father hold any influence at all over their children?
I would argue that a father-son relationship would always have that unless the two Were strangers who met by happenstance.That's a valid point. Consent can have gray areas, such as your example. If it's not fully consenting for reasons of influence, then yeah, I have a problem with it.
Yes because marriage is a choice you make everyday. Have you ever heard of the marriage is not working out?Then again, if someone is in a marriage that has a legal contract behind it and the circumstances of the marriage change in ways that couldn't be foreseen, is it still a fully consenting relationship? Thinking of Melania here.
If the son is over 18 and is fully consenting, why is it your or my business?
:roll:
Why is everything you post stupid?
Well, I would consider it a gray area, but I see your point.I would argue that a father-son relationship would always have that unless the two Were strangers who met by happenstance.
I have more than heard of it. In many cases consent is unambiguous. But I've known of marriages that had gray areas (not mine).Yes because marriage is a choice you make everyday. Have you ever heard of the marriage is not working out?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?