• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Communist Party USA - in a nutshell




Oh my god......


When were you born 1930?


Why don't you stop preaching that anti-commi rhetoric. The government is still controlling, there was never a threat. Jesus christ a right-wnger with dementia.
 
Oh my god......


When were you born 1930?

I don't think I could have handled being born in 1930. Doing one tour of duty killing commies was enough for me. If I were have been born in 1930 I would have had to fight two different wars killing commies.
 
the CPUSA is irrelevant to American politics.... as are communists in general.

>" Late in 2010, Communist Party USA member C.J. Atkins called for his comrades to drop their "communist" label, so that they could work more effectively inside the Democratic Party. Soon thereafter, Joe Sims, co-editor of the CPUSA publication Peoples World, acknowledged not only that collaboration with the the Democrats "will be an area of engagement for those wanting to make a difference," but also that communists might someday be able to "capture" the Democratic Party entirely. Sims warned, however, against dissolving the CPUSA entirely into the Democratic Party. Rather, he advised his organization to remain a separate entity, working both inside and outside the Democratic Party as circumstances required. "< Democratic Party (DP) - Discover the Networks
 

Human tendency are dictate by their culture, competition isn't inherited. Competition is for reptiles who are cold blooded. Mammals have playful attributes....

So is that why survival of the fittest is such an unimportant thing that doesn't happen then. Competition is natural for Mammals and reptiles alike. It is a natural thing. Humans are no exception.

Neoteny is when organisms retain some of their child-like qualities. Which is important for evolution, meaning that those who are aggressive and competitive show characteristics of reverse evolution.

However do children always have to be in first place? Does everyone have to be a winner if they do a race as a child? They do since all the children want to be first due to their natural competitive streak.
 
And there's what, a couple hundred of the dastardly evil-doers? Be always vigilant, they hide everywhere.

You are exactly the sort of anti-McCarthyite I spoke of in the upthread.

"Nothing to see here...move along"
 
Oh my god......


When were you born 1930?


Why don't you stop preaching that anti-commi rhetoric. The government is still controlling, there was never a threat. Jesus christ a right-wnger with dementia.

I was born in '57 and have seen many a nay-sayer (or agent of deception) like yourself

You're not a surprise.
 

Why do we need the communist party when we have the democrat party?
 



Nope competition tries to eliminate the problem by defeating an opponent. Has nothing to do with human progress.

English please.
 
Last edited:
I was born in '57 and have seen many a nay-sayer (or agent of deception) like yourself

You're not a surprise.

Yea.... Like everyone is a commi right. Right-wingers
 
[/B]


Nope competition tries to eliminate the problem by defeating an opponent. Has nothing to do with human progress.

Survival of the fittest. It dictates which species survive and which don't. We still have that primal gene within us, therefore we are still going to be competitive, for example if you had the opportunity to get a prize of $100,000 a year and all you had to do was run a mile but you were going up against another guy, the person who worked the hardest would win, it is natural competition. The species who work the hardest and be the more competitive will succeed hence why we rose above other mammals and animals.
 

Another Libertarian trying to be a biologist:roll:

Do you have an sources for evidence showing primal "genes".

The same ideas from nazi germany... Gotta love eugenicists.
 
Do you have an sources for evidence showing primal "genes".


Competition (biology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to evolutionary theory, this competition within and between species for resources plays a very relevant role in natural selection

Competition is the essence of natural selection in that it's the manner by which the "bad" genes, or the genes that are wanted or aren't useful in the society, are taken out of the gene pool. After all, in the wild, competition usually means whether you or Joe gets to eat tonight or whether you or Jane gets to live. Once you die, you no longer can reproduce and pass on your genes. Albeit It may not be genetic, but the survival of the fittest impulse it still is implanted in us, as is the flight or fight reaction.
 
Last edited:

Where are the sources for the primal "genes" thats what you based your argument??
 
Albeit It may not be genetic, but the survival of the fittest impulse it still is implanted in us, as is the flight or fight reaction.

Where are the sources for the primal "genes" thats what you based your argument??

I have stated that although it is not genetic, competition is naturally an impulse within our bodies, like the fight or flight reaction.
 
I have stated that although it is not genetic, competition is naturally an impulse within our bodies, like the fight or flight reaction.

Sorry... but that doesn't prove that competition is part of human progress or evolution for that matter.
 
Sorry... but that doesn't prove that competition is part of human progress or evolution for that matter.

It may not prove it, but it's pretty obvious to anyone who has a brain. Competition is the basis of evolution itself.
 
Sorry... but that doesn't prove that competition is part of human progress or evolution for that matter.

So do you have any source to disprove it?

Competition is one of the most basic functions of nature. Those best able to compete survive. Those least well adapted die out. Competition remains a powerful instinctual drive in human nature. We compete against each other, we compete against ourselves, and we compete as groups against other groups. Even when the negative aspects of competition inspire us to attempt to intellectually deny this aspect of our nature, we typically end up competing at being non-competitive.
 
It may not prove it, but it's pretty obvious to anyone who has a brain. Competition is the basis of evolution itself.

haha *laughs*

first you need to define competition. competition is when an organism tries to eliminate the problem by defeating an opponent.

Darwin stated that natural selection wasn't the only mechanism of evolution. There was sexual selection and the inheritance of acquired traits. If a bird attacks another bird for singing at the female. Does that solve his problem... NO..... the most attractive male is going to get the attention of the female. People work out to look good, they don't kill every guy that looks at the female. And I think you know what acquired traits are....
 


No... you provide a link that didn't state that competition is the reason for human progress or evolution. You keep talk like you coming from one of konrad lorenz papers.
 
No... you provide a link that didn't state that competition is the reason for human progress or evolution. You keep talk like you coming from one of konrad lorenz papers.

May I ask why you cannot provide one that backs up your claims? Maybe it is because they are not scientific fact?

Competition (biology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Competition is an interaction between organisms or species, in which the fitness of one is lowered by the presence of another

Fitness is a central idea in evolutionary theory. It can be defined either with respect to a genotype or to a phenotype in a given environment. In either case, it describes the ability to both survive and reproduce

Also I am aware that Konrad Lorenz was a Nazi, stop comparing me to Nazi's, I am not a Nazi.
 


Your source is not saying the same thing your saying. You need a new source..... I don''t need counterscource because your evidence doesn't back up your claims

Fitness is not the same as competition.


Thats the same idea he propose.
 
Your source is not saying the same thing your saying. You need a new source..... I don''t need counterscource because your evidence doesn't back up your claims

Fitness (biology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If differences between alleles of a given gene affect fitness, then the frequencies of the alleles will change over generations; the alleles with higher fitness become more common. This process is called natural selection.

Fitness is not the same as competition.

Fitness (biology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This process is called natural selection.

Natural selection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Natural selection can act on any heritable phenotypic trait, and selective pressure can be produced by any aspect of the environment, including sexual selection and competition with members of the same or other species

Thats the same idea he propose.

I just find it coincidental that you have mentioned Nazi's in two of your posts to me now...
 



competition is not natural selection.

your link doesn't say anything about fitness is caused competition.

Heritable traits are not caused by competition.

Konrad Lorenz Justify the nazi extermination with his theories. Your justifying poverty, feudalism and income inequality with your incorrect ideas about biology.
 
competition is not natural selection.

your link doesn't say anything about fitness is caused competition.

Heritable traits are not caused by competition.

Fitness is natural selection which in turn is influenced by competition. The Link provides evidence to support this. You have come out with NO evidence to support your claims and have just made empty assumptions.

Konrad Lorenz Justify the nazi extermination with his theories. Your justifying poverty, feudalism and income inequality with your incorrect ideas about biology.

Have you ever provided evidence for anything?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…