- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 49,307
- Reaction score
- 41,222
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Again you don't know that since the terms of the settlement with CNN are secret.
Yet you are claiming its around $1M....
Again you don't know that since the terms of the settlement with CNN are secret.
I don’t live in Kentucky, so what does that have to do with Nancy failing?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, really?
I'm not going to do a search on every Zimmerman thread: I've already wasted enough time. Feel free to do one yourself and produce posts on which I commented on the Zimmerman case and what I said. What did I waste my time on? Well, a reality-check on your little Bundy claim. I'm going to provide you with the link to the search page: https://www.debatepolitics.com/search.php?searchid=4615051&pp=
If the link doesn't work, just go to the search bar and type in "Clive Bundy." Here are all 5 of my posts on Bundy:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...d-over-illegal-grazing-22.html#post1063147669
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...d-over-illegal-grazing-21.html#post1063147126
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...d-over-illegal-grazing-20.html#post1063146530
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...d-over-illegal-grazing-19.html#post1063146442
https://www.debatepolitics.com/brea...rs-blm-dispute-w-338-a-59.html#post1063464614
Perhaps you have me confused with somebody else. :3oops: :lamo
Hold it. I thought your side claimed to be for free speech. Are you suggesting that Lockhart should be legally censured? Or are you just whining?
Your silence is your complicity.
You're confusing an axiom with a maxim.
The right wing has this silly idea that social media platforms are news.
Something triggered you bigly. What was/is it?
Your delusion is amusing... Sandmann is a snot nosed, entitled brat.. Anxiously awaiting my lawsuit.. [emoji1]
Anything to spite the Libs, right?
Taught a lesson in frivolous lawsuits?
Excuse me, Praxas, but this thread is not about Trump; it's about a CNN analyst making a really childish and unprofessional remark. See if you can stick to the topic instead of trying to derail it.
And by the way, I have never stated for whom I would vote or even if I plan to only downvote. So your attempt to use my thread to launch another screed about the hypocrisy of Trump supporters falls particularly flat.
From National Review:
CNN Political Analyst Joe Lockhart criticized Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic High School graduate who successfully sued the network for defamation, after the teen addressed the Republican National Convention Tuesday night, calling him a “snot-nosed, entitled kid from Kentucky.”
“I’m watching tonight because it’s important. But I don’t have to watch this snot nose entitled kid from Kentucky,” Lockhart, who served as White House press secretary for the Clinton administration, wrote in a tweet.
If this paragon of journalistic professionalism (and maturity) chose not to watch, he missed Sandmann's saying, "I look forward to the day the media returns to providing balanced, responsible and accountable news coverage.” Joe Lockhart: CNN Analyst Labels Nick Sandmann 'Snot-Nosed, Entitled Kid from Kentucky' | National Review
Yet you are claiming its around $1M....
I guess if the leftwing outlets are paying out big money, the lawsuits aren't frivolous, are they?
At least. If you sue a company for almost $300 million are you going to settle for a mere $50,000? Be honest. No trolling response.
If you have no case and very high expenses, absolutely. Lawsuits are expensive and if you lose, someone pays all those fees and it’s not the plaintiff. Happens every day in this country.
Except he won.
Where's the ruling?
The MAGA hats. They have no counter for them, since they were the ones who made them necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People don't pay huge settlements when they're innocent.
It's election time...so you unless you intend to suppress free speech you can expect lots of comparisons to Trump going forward.
The kid appeared at the RNC convention to support Trump...the CNN analyst made a tweet about him. It's perfectly valid to compare Trump's thousands of insulting and dehumanizing tweets to the one measly tweet by a CNN analyst to show the obvious and blatant hypocrisy of the right wing, if nothing else. That's all there is to say about it, really.
People don't pay huge settlements when they're innocent.
Where's the ruling?
From National Review:
CNN Political Analyst Joe Lockhart criticized Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic High School graduate who successfully sued the network for defamation, after the teen addressed the Republican National Convention Tuesday night, calling him a “snot-nosed, entitled kid from Kentucky.”
“I’m watching tonight because it’s important. But I don’t have to watch this snot nose entitled kid from Kentucky,” Lockhart, who served as White House press secretary for the Clinton administration, wrote in a tweet.
If this paragon of journalistic professionalism (and maturity) chose not to watch, he missed Sandmann's saying, "I look forward to the day the media returns to providing balanced, responsible and accountable news coverage.” Joe Lockhart: CNN Analyst Labels Nick Sandmann 'Snot-Nosed, Entitled Kid from Kentucky' | National Review