Clinton wins

[katzgar]

in dixville notch...

Hillary Clinton wins Dixville Notch midnight vote - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Excon]

in dixville notch...

Hillary Clinton wins Dixville Notch midnight vote - CNNPolitics.com

From the article.

Hillary Clinton 4, Donald Trump 2, Gary Johnson 1 -- and a single write-in surprise: Mitt Romney.​

What you clearly didn't mention was the followings.
From the article.

Nearby Millsfield, which also voted at midnight, delivered a big win for Trump, who scored 16 votes to Clinton's four. One voter wrote-in Bernie Sanders, the New Hampshire Democratic primary winner. Meanwhile, Clinton rallied to a narrow victory in Hart's Location, outscoring Trump by a 17-14 margin, with Johnson gaining another three votes and two more voters volunteering Sanders.
With overnight in-person voting completed, Trump carries a seven-vote lead over Clinton, 32-25. ​

Not that this means anything at this point in time.

 

[shagg]

Not that this means anything at this point in time.

I thought she clinched it last week?!?

 

[eohrnberger]

From the article.

Hillary Clinton 4, Donald Trump 2, Gary Johnson 1 -- and a single write-in surprise: Mitt Romney.​

What you clearly didn't mention was the followings.
From the article.

Nearby Millsfield, which also voted at midnight, delivered a big win for Trump, who scored 16 votes to Clinton's four. One voter wrote-in Bernie Sanders, the New Hampshire Democratic primary winner. Meanwhile, Clinton rallied to a narrow victory in Hart's Location, outscoring Trump by a 17-14 margin, with Johnson gaining another three votes and two more voters volunteering Sanders.
With overnight in-person voting completed, Trump carries a seven-vote lead over Clinton, 32-25. ​

Always the 1/2 of the story that they like from these guys. Same as the biased media, such as the Clinton News Network, and many others. Why am I not surprised.

Not that this means anything at this point in time.

It doesn't. Not in the least. Until the actual poll returns start coming in, it's still anyone's race, especially when the difference between the candidates is within the margin of error.

 

[katzgar]

From the article.

Hillary Clinton 4, Donald Trump 2, Gary Johnson 1 -- and a single write-in surprise: Mitt Romney.​

What you clearly didn't mention was the followings.
From the article.

Nearby Millsfield, which also voted at midnight, delivered a big win for Trump, who scored 16 votes to Clinton's four. One voter wrote-in Bernie Sanders, the New Hampshire Democratic primary winner. Meanwhile, Clinton rallied to a narrow victory in Hart's Location, outscoring Trump by a 17-14 margin, with Johnson gaining another three votes and two more voters volunteering Sanders.
With overnight in-person voting completed, Trump carries a seven-vote lead over Clinton, 32-25. ​

Not that this means anything at this point in time.

thanks for a meaningless post

 

[Excon]

thanks for a meaningless post

Your comment is stupid.
The total number of midnight voting is far more meaningful than one portion that makes up the total.

Still, as previously indicated; Not that this (The data in your OP or in my reply.) means anything at this point in time.

 

[katzgar]

Your comment is stupid.
The total number of midnight voting is far more meaningful than one portion that makes up the total.

Still, as previously indicated; Not that this (The data in your OP or in my reply.) means anything at this point in time.

calling your own posts meaningless is just quoting you. My post saying your post in meaningless just reflects your own comment. think through what you post

 

[Excon]

calling your own posts meaningless is just quoting you. My post saying your post in meaningless just reflects your own comment. think through what you post

Another stupid post on your part.

It was your OP and the information contained in the link that is meaningless at this time.
It was also your OP that was shown overall to be meaningless by the information the article contained.

Pointing that out is relevant and was not the meaningless portion to which I referred.
You should really follow your own advice.

 

[katzgar]

"Not that this means anything at this point in time." your foolishness not mine

 

[Excon]

"Not that this means anything at this point in time." your foolishness not mine

You keep making stupid posts and not following your own advice.
What you have in quotes refers to the results being meaningless at this point in time.
Do you really not grasp that?

 

[Kal'Stang]

thanks for a meaningless post

Meaningless because it actually is or meaningless because it shows your candidate lost in certain sections? Like it or not his post was about as "meaningless" as yours.

"Not that this means anything at this point in time." your foolishness not mine

What he said was true. At this point in time one candidate or the other winning one town (note: its a town, not a city) or even 10 towns is completely meaningless. Especially when that town has only 75 people in it such as Dixville. Your OP was far more pointless than Excon's.

 

[late]

thanks for a meaningless post

Not meaningless, it illustrates how divided the Republican party is, quite nicely.

 

[Kal'Stang]

Not meaningless, it illustrates how divided the Republican party is, quite nicely.

No, it illustrates how divided between the two major candidates the people are in general.

 

[Excon]

Not meaningless, it illustrates how divided the Republican party is, quite nicely.

Pointing out how his post was meaningless illustrates no such thing, nor could it.
It is funny that you somehow think it does.

 

[katzgar]

do you not get what quotes are for? "Not that this means anything at this point in time." your foolishness not mine

 

[katzgar]

Meaningless because it actually is or meaningless because it shows your candidate lost in certain sections? Like it or not his post was about as "meaningless" as yours.



What he said was true. At this point in time one candidate or the other winning one town (note: its a town, not a city) or even 10 towns is completely meaningless. Especially when that town has only 75 people in it such as Dixville. Your OP was far more pointless than Excon's.

I agree his post is indeed meaningless like he says

 

[poweRob]

Pointing out how his post was meaningless illustrates no such thing, nor could it.
It is funny that you somehow think it does.

I dont recall ever seeing any post you made that isn't overtly defensive and sensitive.

 

[Kal'Stang]

I agree his post is indeed meaningless like he says

Yours is even more meaningless.

 

[poweRob]

If this thread gets any more childish it will need diapers.

 

[Paperview]

This picture is worth a thousand...

 

[katzgar]

Yours is even more meaningless.

no, your post is meaninglesser

 

[Excon]

I dont recall ever seeing any post you made that isn't overtly defensive and sensitive.

1. Irrelevant to this topic and what was said.
2. If that is so, the problem resides with the way you choose to view things, not on this end as it is furthest from the truth.

 

[Excon]

do you not get what quotes are for? "Not that this means anything at this point in time." your foolishness not mine

iLOL
No, all yours again.
You keep making stupid replies and are now showing you have no clue as to what you speak.

 

[katzgar]

yet you describe your post as meaningless...lets just agree on that

 

[Excon]

yet you describe your post as meaningless...lets just agree on that

And again you are wrong.
As you were already told.

Your comment is stupid.
The total number of midnight voting is far more meaningful than one portion that makes up the total.

Still, as previously indicated; Not that this (The data in your OP or in my reply.) means anything at this point in time.

​

That makes it clear I spoke about the data from the article being meaningless at the time.
Yet for some odd reason you choose to be incapable of understanding that.
And pointing out that what you provided is meaningless, as a direct refutation, is not meaninglessness. Duh!

You are just wrong and have continued to be wrong with every post. Sad.