“We’re doing Google ads and Facebook ads to drive support in an effort to capture all the enthusiasm for Hillary across the country,” the group’s communications director, Seth Bringman, told Yahoo News. “Our goal is to build up that army of supporters as big as possible and show her the support that she has.”
Ready for Hillary, which has already held rallies in key battleground states like Florida and Michigan, hopes that its growing number of supporters will help push the former first lady and New York senator to run. Meanwhile, Clinton herself has drummed up large crowds at profitable speaking events across the country.
“We couldn’t speak for her,” said Bringman. “But we hope that the support is being seen every single day.”
Clinton hasn't lost any of her popularity since leaving the State Department in February. Yahoo has seen fairly regular searches for the keyword "Hillary Clinton" over the last two years — and while that may be the norm for high-profile celebrities, it’s something of a rarity for politicos other than the president.
I love her speeches in the south when she whips out the fake southern drawl. Wish she would give a speech in Jamaica.
-----------------------Didn't that speech happen like 6 years ago? What speeches is she giving in the South these days?
Clinton leads potential opponents in new poll
It's way too early for this stuff. However, this is pretty interesting given how Republicans couldn't make Benghazi stick to Hilary. They can't even connect the IRS thing to the Obama administration. They've basically proven themselves completely incompetent to have anything really stick to the administration in the way they tried to do it with Clinton's administration. Given all of that, Hillary seems to be positioning herself for a 2016 run. Democrats don't seem to have any front runners other than her. So they may as well build on her popularity and try to cut off any rising Republican contenders.
Clinton leads potential opponents in new poll
It's way too early for this stuff. However, this is pretty interesting given how Republicans couldn't make Benghazi stick to Hilary. They can't even connect the IRS thing to the Obama administration. They've basically proven themselves completely incompetent to have anything really stick to the administration in the way they tried to do it with Clinton's administration. Given all of that, Hillary seems to be positioning herself for a 2016 run. Democrats don't seem to have any front runners other than her. So they may as well build on her popularity and try to cut off any rising Republican contenders.
Only idiots believe Hillary was not associated with Benghazi.
Didn't that speech happen like 6 years ago? What speeches is she giving in the South these days?
-----------------------
Well...yes.
However, ( borrowing the Palin theme from my conservative friends ), the GOP is so terrified of Hillary, they will use any means to smear the woman.
??????????Ah yes, the vast right wing conspiracy.
I still cannot believe people were that stupid but then again according to Eaul Dukes
--------
---------------
Well...yes.
However, ( borrowing the Palin theme from my conservative friends ), the GOP is so terrified of Hillary, they will use any means to smear the woman.
??????????
If her name was Hillary Smith, she'd be as electable as Ralph Nader.
Hatuey thinks he's Hunter S Thompson who used the alias " Roaul Duke" in the book Fear and Loathing in Las Vagas.
One of my favorite Hunter S Thompson books....yes I know your'e surprised, I'm a big Hunter S Thompson fan.
Warp back to the Clinton scandals and his assertion that they were being pushed by some " vast right wing Conspiracy".
The rest of my post is self explanatory.
As she served in the U.S. Senate and
also as Secretary of State--providing
her both domestic and foreign policy experience at a high level--she would be a credible candidate under any reasonable scenario in terms of her experience. Many others have sought the Presidency, some successfully, with less impressive experience.
As she served in the U.S. Senate and also as Secretary of State--providing her both domestic and foreign policy experience at a high level--she would be a credible candidate under any reasonable scenario in terms of her experience. Many others have sought the Presidency, some successfully, with less impressive experience.
Wait, I think I'm HST because I have him in a
picture on a forum? Would that well thought out train of thought make you think you're Banksy?
And buddy, it's "Raoul".
You know, when you're using quotation marks in reference to what somebody said, you're implying they said those words. Not that you're using them sarcastically. The rest of your post is just nonsense.
:shrug:
Eaul Dukes
Roaul Duke
She's hardly flawless but the same could be said of Obama - the guy who won the last election.
The election is over 3 years away. If this US continues its slow, painful recovery, we'll be in decent shape by that time.
If the GOP doesn't show some wisdom in their platform or candidate choice, she may well win by default rather than merit. The GOP has 3 years to straighten up, I'm seeing a few small signs. We shall see.
Increase legal immigration, by a lot. Letting folks into our country who want to work, get an education, and improve their lives is good for them and good for us. We should increase legal immigration not only for unskilled laborers, but also for skilled workers from all over the world. We need to stop educating the world’s best and brightest engineers and scientists and then upon graduation kick them out of the country so they can compete with us and create growth and wealth in other countries. [Emphasis added]
Define "served" because as the Sec State she was a disaster, cost 4 Americans their lives and then lied directly to the faces of the parents who lost their sons in Benghazi.
She pathetic, as a leader and as a human being.
She's hardly flawless but the same could be said of Obama - the guy who won
the last election.
The election is over 3 years away. If this US continues its slow, painful recovery, we'll be in decent shape by that time.
If the GOP doesn't show some wisdom in their platform or candidate choice, she may well win by default rather than merit. The GOP has 3 years to straighten up, I'm seeing a few small signs. We shall see.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?