• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

City looks to make gun ownership mandatory

BmanMcfly

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 3, 2008
Messages
12,753
Reaction score
2,321
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/city-looks-make-gun-ownership-mandatory/nWhgr/

Posted: 6:35 p.m. Tuesday, March 5, 2013


What would people think of MANDATORY exercise of the second amendment ??
 
You know, what I really wanted was to make sure every abusive household has a chance to escalate domestic violence into a murder. Thanks, Nelson, GA! Let's have every family with lazy, neglectful parents be given the opportunity for tragedy. I had a dream, where every borderline schizophrenic was properly armed for when the lizard people came knocking at the door... or was that the mailman?
 
Forcing people to buy things on the theory that it'll make their lives better?

Sounds unconstitutional to me.
 
It will never pass muster.

Such law has not been struck down yet.
Kennesaw, Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 1982 the city passed an ordinance [Sec 34-21][SUP][17][/SUP]
(a) In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore.
(b)Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.
 
Can we sell Georgia. Maybe throw in Alabama and make it a two for one sale. :lamo
 
City looks to make gun ownership mandatory | www.wsbtv.com

Posted: 6:35 p.m. Tuesday, March 5, 2013



What would people think of MANDATORY exercise of the second amendment ??

LOL - a town where every dumb**** idiot is required to own a firearm is one town I wouldn't want to live in. I'd rather stay here - where only people who are interested in said right and responsibility have said firearms.

The possibility that most people have them is what keeps our crime so low.
 
It worked for PPACA, so simply apply a tax for those that do not comply, the SCOTUS likes that approach to cover unfunded mandates.
 
City looks to make gun ownership mandatory | www.wsbtv.com

Posted: 6:35 p.m. Tuesday, March 5, 2013



What would people think of MANDATORY exercise of the second amendment ??

If its mandatory then it really can't be considered a right.I do not think people should be forced to own a gun.If someone wants a gun then that his business and no one else, if someone does not want a gun then that is still his business and no one else.
 

Wait a minute, that law just says "everyone has to have a gun, unless they don't want to."

It probably hasn't been struck down because it has never been actually enforced, and therefore never challenged.
 

It does not mandate that it be loaded, carried or fired. No worse than PPACA.
 

Just like "private" medical care insurance?
 
Are they giving them away for free

No, but at least they exempted the poor and anyone that does not want to buy one (the law allows for conscientious objection). It is more of a please do this law than an outright unfunded mandate.
 
No, but at least they exempted the poor and anyone that does not want to buy one (the law allows for conscientious objection). It is more of a please do this law than an outright unfunded mandate.

so - passing it was really a waste of taxpayer dollars? The queen of England of ordinances.
 
Not really in favor of government...be it local, state, or federal, mandating that individuals participate in a "Right" or purchase something. It's not really a "right" to do something if you're forced to do it.
 
so - passing it was really a waste of taxpayer dollars? The queen of England of ordinances.

Far cheaper than renaming a bridge or building, or even declaring a holiday.
 
Last edited:
Surely a right is a choice. By making it compulsory, it ceases to be a right and becomes an obligation.
 
What would people think of MANDATORY exercise of the second amendment ??

The same thing I think of mandatory exercise of the First.

Just because I'm free to own a newspaper that prints whatever I want it to doesn't mean I have to.
 
The same thing I think of mandatory exercise of the First.

Just because I'm free to own a newspaper that prints whatever I want it to doesn't mean I have to.

Well, it's 2013 so we'll update it for the times. You must meet a daily forum posting quota or go to jail!

I'm good, I think.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…