Cindy Has Right To Be Angry

[Missouri Mule]

Hey MM, How you doing? Jallman is a wanna be Conservative..Problem is he only has liberal views......:lol: talk bout mixed up........

He is also ignorant of history and of the law. But this is what I expect of crypto liberals who masquerade as conservatives. There is always the "but" that ends at the conclusion of their screeds. It goes essentially like this. "I was always a Republican" until George Bush got elected........ blah, blah, blah.

I doubt if one could find one genuine conservative in the world who supports Sheehan. She has stopped being a sympathetic figure long ago. Her fifteen minutes of fame was over weeks ago and she should crawl back under the rock from whence she came.

BTW, she got her meeting with John McCain, a genuine war hero who rotted in the Hanoi Hilton but she pronounced him a "warmonger." She is just part of the same old Micheal Moore, Noam Chomsky, Ramsey Clark, Ward Churchill and Jane Fonda crowd. They are cut of the same cloth. And they are all full of hate for America. The question that I keep asking is why don't they just leave. Castro and Kim il Jung would welcome them with open arms. She would have had a ball under the old Taliban regime where they took women to the soccer field to put a bullet in the back of their heads for showing an ankle beneath their burkas. Too bad they aren't around anymore for her to embrace them. Then she would really have something to bellyache about.

 

[jallman]

Hey MM, How you doing? Jallman is a wanna be Conservative..Problem is he only has liberal views......:lol: talk bout mixed up........

I never said I wanted to be a conservative either. I am only slightly conservative in my fiscal views but I guess I am quite liberal socially. Is that what you have been fishing for these past two days, Chief? :roll:

 

[jallman]

He is also ignorant of history and of the law. But this is what I expect of crypto liberals who masquerade as conservatives. There is always the "but" that ends at the conclusion of their screeds. It goes essentially like this. "I was always a Republican" until George Bush got elected........ blah, blah, blah.

Ignorant of history and the law? This coming from a gentleman who wants to convict a woman of treason because she exercised her most basic right as an American citizen...

Now who is closer to the extemist mindset found in the middle east? That twisted logic might get you somewhere on Taliban website, sport.

 

[Navy Pride]

I never said I wanted to be a conservative either. I am only slightly conservative in my fiscal views but I guess I am quite liberal socially. Is that what you have been fishing for these past two days, Chief? :roll:

I knew you would come clean sooner or later my liberal friend........I don't blame you for not wanting to admit it though........

 

[jallman]

I knew you would come clean sooner or later my liberal friend........I don't blame you for not wanting to admit it though........

I do believe I came clean with that a long time ago. I just didnt realize I had to spell things out so blatantly for you to understand...I mean the retard jokes were just jokes, right? One must wonder though.

 

[Caine]

Aren't you the same character that didn't even know who Axis Sally and Toyko Rose were? And you've got the gall to lecture me about conservative ideology. Conservative ideology relies on facts and known history. Liberals, by and large, are completely ignorant of history and every day they wake up it is a new world. Am I wrong?

BTW, it is certainly not un-American to assail one who is committing treason. It is part of the federal statutes and it ought to apply to Sheehan. She really belongs behind bars and not out in the public giving aid and comfort to the terrorists in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Maybe im not caught up on all of her actions, but what exactly is she doing to AID the terrorists again?

 

[Missouri Mule]

I never said I wanted to be a conservative either. I am only slightly conservative in my fiscal views but I guess I am quite liberal socially. Is that what you have been fishing for these past two days, Chief? :roll:

Well, I knew that you were "socially liberal" even without fessing up. It is now the mantra of the liberal/left that they are "fiscally conservative" because Bush is spending money like a drunken sailor. They think this will fly politically and I suppose a few gullible souls will buy this bulloney.

I wasn't fishing. I was born, but not yesterday.

 

[jallman]

Maybe im not caught up on all of her actions, but what exactly is she doing to AID the terrorists again?

Absolutely nothing...as I said before, how many of these cave dwelling terrorists do you think even know who she is? And further, how many of our intelligent soldiers give a crap about this woman and her media whoring?

 

[jallman]

Well, I knew that you were "socially liberal" even without fessing up. It is now the mantra of the liberal/left that they are "fiscally conservative" because Bush is spending money like a drunken sailor. They think this will fly politically and I suppose a few gullible souls will buy this bulloney.

I wasn't fishing. I was born, but not yesterday.

I dont really have much of a problem with the way bush is spending. its needed. Wars cost money. And then comes the question about the tax rebate and cuts...well a fiscally conservative person recognizes that when you put money in the people's pockets, they spend...and when the spend, the revenue generated is infinitely worth more than that of a tax hike.

And being socially liberal is not something I had to "fess up to." I figured it was obvious to any preceptive, intelligent person.

 

[Missouri Mule]

Maybe im not caught up on all of her actions, but what exactly is she doing to AID the terrorists again?

Hint: Read what she has said. Then read the federal statutes regarding treason. It isn't rocket science. It really isn't even grade school understanding of law to know that what she has said makes her lower than a snake's belly. She is actively costing the lives of our soldiers in the Middle East. That is a true test of what constitutes treason. Bin Laden and Zarqawi just lap up every word she has to say and they print up and dissiminate their propaganda every single day telling their fanatical followers what Cindy and her fellow travelers have to say. Even if they believe they have been beaten this gives them the fuel to continue on with their bombings, murder and mayhem. If there was a terrorist "uniform" she would have to be sent to the tailors to get one custom fit made especially for her.

 

[Missouri Mule]

I dont really have much of a problem with the way bush is spending. its needed. Wars cost money. And then comes the question about the tax rebate and cuts...well a fiscally conservative person recognizes that when you put money in the people's pockets, they spend...and when the spend, the revenue generated is infinitely worth more than that of a tax hike.

And being socially liberal is not something I had to "fess up to." I figured it was obvious to any preceptive, intelligent person.

The point is that "social liberals" are the same ilk that support the Sheehans of the world. That's why I knew instantly what you were.

Being "socially liberal" is just code for being against Bush, against the war, and in the end against America. We used to call these the "San Francisco Democrats" (where 85% voted against Bush) and the "Blame America First Crowd." They haven't changed; just their labels. Today "progressives"; tomorrow the "defenders of the constitution", etc. Just like the ACLU is an unregistered agent of foreign powers "social liberals" are their unwitting allies who would destroy all that is good about America. They still haven't gotten over the fact that their side lost the Cold War. The more that things change the more they stay the same. There is really nothing new under the sun.

 

[Caine]

Hint: Read what she has said. Then read the federal statutes regarding treason. It isn't rocket science. It really isn't even grade school understanding of law to know that what she has said makes her lower than a snake's belly. She is actively costing the lives of our soldiers in the Middle East. That is a true test of what constitutes treason. Bin Laden and Zarqawi just lap up every word she has to say and they print up and dissiminate their propaganda every single day telling their fanatical followers what Cindy and her fellow travelers have to say. Even if they believe they have been beaten this gives them the fuel to continue on with their bombings, murder and mayhem. If there was a terrorist "uniform" she would have to be sent to the tailors to get one custom fit made especially for her.

Is she saying things about troop locations, giving specific guard changout times and patrol times locations of our troops to them? Is she telling the terrorists any details of our military plans so they can know where not to be or what to do to prepare for any raids or assaults on them. What?
Is she providing them with weapons? Hell, is she even sending them TOILET paper? Is she providing terrorists with a home inside the united states? What? Just her words of dislike for our own government are treason?
So you are telling me she isn't allowed to dislike our President withon being Treasonous?

 

[Missouri Mule]

Is she saying things about troop locations, giving specific guard changout times and patrol times locations of our troops to them? Is she telling the terrorists any details of our military plans so they can know where not to be or what to do to prepare for any raids or assaults on them. What?
Is she providing them with weapons? Hell, is she even sending them TOILET paper? Is she providing terrorists with a home inside the united states? What? Just her words of dislike for our own government are treason?

So you are telling me she isn't allowed to dislike our President withon being Treasonous?

Hell, I don't much like the president. I think his handling of New Orleans was abysmal and even put an impeachment thread on another site. His lack of leadership was palpable. What I am talking about is what she has said about the war and our conduct in the Middle East. Before we discuss this further, you really ought to investigate what she has said and then I'll be happy to respond further.

 

[jallman]

The point is that "social liberals" are the same ilk that support the Sheehans of the world. That's why I knew instantly what you were.

Being "socially liberal" is just code for being against Bush, against the war, and in the end against America. We used to call these the "San Francisco Democrats" (where 85% voted against Bush) and the "Blame America First Crowd." They haven't changed; just their labels. Today "progressives"; tomorrow the "defenders of the constitution", etc. Just like the ACLU is an unregistered agent of foreign powers "social liberals" are their unwitting allies who would destroy all that is good about America. They still haven't gotten over the fact that their side lost the Cold War. The more that things change the more they stay the same. There is really nothing new under the sun.

First of all, I am not against Bush or this war. Is it so hard for you to separate your dogmatic rigidness and understand that you dont have to agree with everything your leader does. There is no blame to be put on America; America is out there fighting the good fight. I love America, which is why I become enraged when one such as you would degrade and vilify another American who exercises their rights...the most basic rights listed in a little document called The Bill of Rights. Ever hear of it?

And let me let you in on a little secret...if you dont like the message, dont listen to it. If you dont like the messenger, turn your back on her. Thats your right too. And history lesson for you...We didnt lose the Cold War. We are still standing as America when the Soviet Union has fallen. And you are right about one thing...there is nothing new under the sun. Ignorance will always endure, unfortunately.

 

[jamesrage]

Default Cindy Has Right To Be Angry

I think a more acurate title would be a "Cindy has a right to be a media whore, expliot the memory of her dead son, and to belittle what her sign died for."

 

[jallman]

Is she saying things about troop locations, giving specific guard changout times and patrol times locations of our troops to them? Is she telling the terrorists any details of our military plans so they can know where not to be or what to do to prepare for any raids or assaults on them. What?
Is she providing them with weapons? Hell, is she even sending them TOILET paper? Is she providing terrorists with a home inside the united states? What? Just her words of dislike for our own government are treason?
So you are telling me she isn't allowed to dislike our President withon being Treasonous?

Thats exactly what he is saying. And with that kind of political leaning, he should just go sit down with Saddam, share a cigar, and join together in writing a constitution for their own little utopia...

 

[Missouri Mule]

I think a more acurate title would be a "Cindy has a right to be a media whore, expliot the memory of her dead son, and to belittle what her sign died for."

Very succinctly stated and dead on accurate.

 

[Missouri Mule]

Thats exactly what he is saying. And with that kind of political leaning, he should just go sit down with Saddam, share a cigar, and join together in writing a constitution for their own little utopia...

That's exactly what I am NOT saying. Gimme a break. Can you read or is that no longer in the public school curriculum?

 

[jallman]

I think a more acurate title would be a "Cindy has a right to be a media whore, expliot the memory of her dead son, and to belittle what her sign died for."

thats pretty much how I feel about it. But that comes nowhere near treason.

 

[Caine]

I think a more acurate title would be a "Cindy has a right to be a media whore, expliot the memory of her dead son, and to belittle what her sign died for."

Although she DOES have a right to do all those things, I don't necessarily agree with her or anything.
Like I've said before. I stand for what I stand for, I point things out where they are in my opinion right or wrong. Some people on this thread like to generalize someone, they probably even think I agree with all the bullshit she is doing, but I don't. Her first intentions were good. Then the media did turn her into a monster.

 

[jallman]

That's exactly what I am NOT saying. Gimme a break. Can you read or is that no longer in the public school curriculum?

Do I need to starting pulling quotes from the past day or two? And concerning the reading comment...people in glass houses....

 

[Navy Pride]

I think a more acurate title would be a "Cindy has a right to be a media whore, expliot the memory of her dead son, and to belittle what her sign died for."

I could not have said it better my friend.......To me anyone who speaks in support of a convicted terrorist is a traitor to this country and she did exactly that in San Frnacisco in April.......

 

[jallman]

Although she DOES have a right to do all those things, I don't necessarily agree with her or anything.
Like I've said before. I stand for what I stand for, I point things out where they are in my opinion right or wrong. Some people on this thread like to generalize someone, they probably even think I agree with all the bullshit she is doing, but I don't. Her first intentions were good. Then the media did turn her into a monster.

Nicely put, but now you are an America hating liberal...its a matter of time before Stone Cold Navy Pride says so...

 

[Caine]

Nicely put, but now you are an America hating liberal...its a matter of time before Stone Cold Navy Pride says so...

:rofl Yes, I have noticed that he can only see things in Black and White.

He doesn't understand that I can defend that she is not Treasonous and still not agree with the crazy, outlandish things that she represent.

 

[Navy Pride]

:rofl Yes, I have noticed that he can only see things in Black and White.

He doesn't understand that I can defend that she is not Treasonous and still not agree with the crazy, outlandish things that she represent.

So what would you call someone who makes a speech defending a convicted terrorist and calls the President of the United States the biggest terrorist in the world?