- Joined
- Dec 2, 2013
- Messages
- 3,237
- Reaction score
- 2,159
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
You've made your point already. Roads and railroads are not "progress," but wilderness is.
According to those who think wilderness, not civilization is "progress."
Do you fully grasp the implications of your stance against civilization, coupled with the belief that whoever opposes you is "a scourge to this planet?"
We do not need to destroy what little wilderness remains on this planet for civilization to continue to exist. I can be a fan of civilization and want to protect the Amazon at the same time.
Last edited: