middleagedgamer
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,363
- Reaction score
- 72
- Location
- Earth
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
He didn't.But, moreso, who the **** goes to Judge Judy for child support issues?
He didn't.
If you actually ****ing watched the video, you'd know that was just a background issue in the grand scheme of things.
He didn't.
If you actually ****ing watched the video, you'd know that was just a background issue in the grand scheme of things.
That should be decided during the divorce case.Child support is for the financial benefit of the child, not the mother. Visitation is largely unrelated.
If a guy is an awful father who beats his children, should he get visitation? No. Should he still pay child support? Of course.
Naw duh!edit: Also, "Judge" Judy is not a judge, she's an arbitrator who takes binding arbitration and puts it on TV. She has no authority to rule on child support/visitation matters.
No wonder your threads all die...no one wants to deal with your rudeness.
That should be decided during the divorce case.
After the divorce is finalized, there should be consequences for not honoring whatever visitation rights the father IS entitled.
Naw duh!
What honestly makes you think I DON'T know that?
They are related in the sense that they both involve the welfare of the child.And there are, but those consequences are entirely unrelated to child support.
So, why is it that the custodial parent is allowed to spend that child support money however she pleases?Again, child support is between the non-custodial parent and the child.
Prove it.Visitation is between the non-custodial parent and the custodial parent.
You do when the custodial parent is abusing those rights and privileges.You don't punish the child for the custodial parent's actions.
Moderator's Warning: |
Moderator's Warning: Let's cease with the personal attacks shall we?
So, why is it that the custodial parent is allowed to spend that child support money however she pleases?
She can spend it on beer and cigarettes, and there's absolutely no repercussions.
They are related in the sense that one should influence the other.
So, why is it that the custodial parent is allowed to spend that child support money however she pleases? She can spend it on beer and cigarettes, and there's absolutely no repercussions.
Prove it.
At the very least, any money you expend asserting your legal rights to visitation should be taken out of any alimony and child support obligations, which would have the same overall effect.
Now, if the mother refuses to honor the father's visitation rights, shouldn't the father be relieved of his child support obligations?
Doing so would probably encourage the mothers to grant the visitation rights.
Thoughts?
Have the others cease with the stupidity, and I will.
But, if they really are that dumb, they DESERVE to be attacked.
Sadly, there's no 'family / child' forum so we're always lost when we post those issues.
I think this is a great idea, with a couple caveats. IF the non-custodial parent was granted visitation, and IF the non-custodial parent has been paying child support faithfully, then if the custodial parent is not allowing visitation, the non-custodial parent should be relieved of their need to pay child support.
Not allowing visitation damages not only the non-custodial parent, but the children. And even if the custodial parent is only spending child support on the children like they should, it's likely that they are reaping benefits from it (nicer/larger living arrangements, more of their own money for entertainment, eating out, etc.)
Ideally, both child support and custody/visitation would be part of a contract, that if violated by one party would render the whole thing null and void.
-- If the custodial parent who receives child support is spending it freely on HERSELF then there's likely a case against her because child support is meant for the CHILDREN'S needs - not Mom's (or Dad's, depending on who has custody) - it can be waged that the needs of the child aren't being met if they need things like new glasses, clothes, dental visits, adequate nutrition, medication - all the while Mom's satisfying her cravings and buying designer purses - and the kids are going without adequate care.
It takes a good bit of evidence to prove this - but it's still worth pursuing if it's going on.
-- Non-custodial parents still have rights! If those rights are denied by the custodial parent -
According to this:
YouTube - judge judy too Hard for lawyer (stupid lawyer) 1/2
The defendant had decided to sue his ex wife to enforce his visitation rights.
To prove that he HAD visitation rights, he had to show the lawyer his tax returns for the past few years to prove that he had a child support obligation.
-- Now, if the mother refuses to honor the father's visitation rights, shouldn't the father be relieved of his child support obligations?
Doing so would probably encourage the mothers to grant the visitation rights.
Thoughts?
-- My niece doesn't even recognize my sister as her mother anymore, her step mom has been great and really took the role as mother.
It's a shame because now my sister is bring this to court for custody and all sorts of financial damages.
I wish her step mom could adopt her and be rid of my sister once and for all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?