"Thug, thug, thug."
That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.
In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
As was pointed out earlier, you can be killed by one punch. How many are you willing to take? If someone was on your chest pounding your head on concrete how long would you let them do it?
St Trayvon of Skittles should have kept his hands to himself.
St Trayvon of Skittles wasn't shot because he smoked weed or how he was dressed or how he walked or talked.This is where a lot of black folks get it mixed up in their rush to defend anything another black person does.
St Trayvon of Skittles was shot because he thought he was tough and attacked a "creepy ass cracker" who just happened to be carrying.
The worst and last mistake he ever made.
He should have kept his hands to himself.
Well Trayvon unfortunately lost his life and yes, maybe if he kept his hands to himself he would have lived. But you know what Zimmerman's life is over anyway. Do you honestly think he can go anywhere and be public? Nope. Zimmerman's death began the moment Trayvon stopped breathing.
At the end of the day Zimmerman is a coward and people that think like Zimmerman are cowards to me.
This is white puritanical garbage.
I was a child.
My mother was struggling between jobs not to mention my mother had cancer. Yeah I had a lot of options. Yeah at two years old I was old enough to invest in buying houses.
"Thug, thug, thug."
That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.
In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
At the end of the day Zimmerman is a coward and people that think like Zimmerman are cowards to me.
The Black Ghetto on the Southside of Chicago has been a White man created and enforced segregated community since the 1920's.
"Thug, thug, thug."
That is all conservatives call Trayvon. I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living. Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.
In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
Stop with your idiotic spin.Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.
:naughty"Thug, thug, thug."
Wrong! So stop exaggerating.That is all conservatives call Trayvon.
Your definition, and the generic definition, do not match.I grew up in the 80's Trayvon wasn't a thug, Trayvon was a kid. Sure did Trayvon smoke weed? I'm sure, just like the snotty nosed white kids in Westwood or Bel Air. Trayvon was a kid who prbably did juvenile things. What is a real thug? A real thug robs people for everything and leaves them with just a pair of shoes. A thug is not dress apparel or how you talk or walk, this is where a lot of white folks get it mixed up. Thugs rob people for a living.
Still showing you do not know the evidence of this case. Your statement is blatantly false.Trayvon was with his dad buying skittles and tea.
Exactly. You don't care!In my opinion I don't care if Trayvon was buying products to nake cocaine, the point is Trayvon was minding his own business. If I am a resident in the neighborhood as long as another resident is maintaining the peace its not my business to butt in. But Zimmerman on the other hand...
Didn't you just establish that Liberals have run Chicago forever?Liberals have run Chicago forever, why is there a black ghetto?
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.What's your beef? So every white person is responsible for the crime on the south side of Chicago? Brilliant. You must have a 50 pound brain (sarcasm).
Liberals have run Chicago forever, why is there a black ghetto?
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.
Stop with your idiotic spin.
It was not a fight.
It was an attack.
That is the evidence.
There is a big difference between the two. Obviously you didn't know that.
Zimmerman acting justly, after help he called for didn't come, is not the act of a coward.
But IMO, I would say your saying so is the act of a coward.
:naughty
Apparently you are confused as to what was said.
Read it again because you are still confusing the two which you were told not to.
Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.
Wrong! So stop exaggerating.
Your definition, and the generic definition, do not match.
thug
THəg/Google Search: Define+Thug
noun
noun: thug; plural noun: thugs; noun: Thug
1. a violent person, esp. a criminal.
synonyms: ruffian, hooligan, vandal, hoodlum, gangster, villain, criminal;
informal: tough, bruiser, hardman, goon, heavy, enforcer, hired gun, hood
"one of Capone's thugs"
2.historical
a member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali,
the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner.
They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.
Still showing you do not know the evidence of this case. Your statement is blatantly false.
Exactly. You don't care!
You don't care about the facts because instead of recognizing the facts, you choose to see something that doesn't exist.
Even in this comment you either ignore to spin, or just do not know the facts.
Trayvon was not minding his own business.
Looking into homes is not minding his own business. Nor is acting out violently like a thug.
So as your point is wrong, you have no relevant point.
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
You have already been told. It was not a fight but an attack.Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
You have already been told. It was not a fight but an attack.
There is a difference. Learn it.
BTW, I am not debating you.
I am correcting you.
Learn the difference.
Wrong!I call it a fight you call it an attack. No witnesses to the supposed attack. You werent corr3cting me, you was defending a coward.
:lamoLMAO you googled thug just because its in the dictionary it must be true. I once outsmarted a professor about his own book, it doesn't mean I know more than the teacher, it means I had more understanding about that particular subjectCowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
Cowards call losing a fight an attack. That is my opinion. Zimmerman is a coward, a dangerous coward at that. Why debate this with me?
Not any more than every white person is responsible for slavery. Your brain obviously lacks certain functions, like recognizing cause and effect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?