- Joined
- May 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 91
- Location
- Eastern Standard Time zone
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
RightatNYU said:One thing that I would like to mention that I think everyone's forgotten.
As to whether or not gay people can have babies, if they get the Stork's phone number, can't they place an order just like any straight couple?
I mean, seriously, wtf, mate?
Gay's raising kids is no different than straight people raising kids.
Libertarian said:Then it must also be no different then pedophiles raising kids, coprophiles raising kids, zoophiles raising kids, and necrophiels raising kids.
Libertarian said:all of those behaviors are abnormal....now, do you admit to being a homosexual?
Libertarian said:You asked me to draw the parallel to homosexuality, zoophilia, coprophilia, etc, and I just did it, thus answering your question, even though you refuse to admit that you are a homosexual....now, try answering it.
RightatNYU said:No, you didn't.
You claimed that they were all connected because they were abnormal. I pointed out several other things that were abnormal, and asked if they were also worthy of denying someone the right to bear a child. You avoided answering the question, and again fixiated on whether or not I'm gay, a topic which has no relevance.
Libertarian said:Axctually, you asked me to show the link, I did, then you tried to get away with not answering my question by asking me a second one.
Is it safe to assume you don't wish to answer the question asking whether you are a homosexual?
If those are all abnormal, then so is abusing alcohol, being a bigot, and jaywalking. Should everyone who is "guilty" of any of those offenses not be allowed to have kids either?
galenrox said:Let me get this straight libertarian, you now believe that everyone that is abnormal is gay? Correct me if I'm wrong.
galenrox said:Dude, 90% of the time I have no idea what point you're trying to make, that's why I said "correct me if I'm wrong." I thought that saying that would be pretty straightforward, but since you didn't get it, I'll make it a little more simple for you, if I am wrong about what I said about your point, then tell me that I am wrong by telling me what your point is, in other words, what's your point?
It's really not that hard.
Libertarian said:Galenrox, correct me if I am wrong, but are you a chickenhawk heavy leather HIV positive pedophile serial molesting public restroom stall lurking homosexual from the liberalforum.org? I am not saying you are, I am just asking.....
Gandhi>Bush said:galenrox,
Libertarian,
Please do not let this turn into a party of throwing insults at each other, or else I'll throw it in the basement where it would belong. Thank you. Have a nice day :2razz: .
vauge said:Libertarian has been banned for 5 days:
- Exceesive hate speech (rude and name calling only to promote negative speech - aka troll)
- Copyright infringement (full posting of material & sometimes without source)
- Distruption to the forums as defined in the rules
All these after multiple attempts of kindly asking this person to stop.
If there are any questions - please PM me or any of the MODS.
Well let's break it down here, just because something is "abnormal" doesn't necessarily mean it's bad. Being Left-handed is "abnormal", is it bad? No.
Being a Red head is "abnormal" is that Bad? No.
Any trait or preference that does not coincide with the majority is "abnormal." This is not to say all things "abnormal" are bad.
What's being missed here is that all the things that Lib has claimed as being abnormal, with the exception of homosexuality, are actually in and of themselves harmful. They either create victims or are directly harmful to the person possessing such proclivity.
Someone who molests children harms children. Someone who drinks to the point of addiction will cause physical health harm.
Someone who happens to be gay is not causing harm to themselves or anyone else.
Risky sexual behavior is not a direct effect of homosexuality as it is not limited to homosexuals.
Not all homosexuals partake of risky sexual behaviors, nor do they target others who are unable to make informed decisions or give informed consent.
All Eagles are birds, All penguins are birds. But all Eagles are NOT penguins.
JustineCredible said:Can we get back, at least, to where we were before the whole thing got so blown out of porportion?
Please?
I'll repost my last, just so we know where we were.
RightatNYU said:As far as I can tell, I think you're preaching to the choir.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?