• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clinton

Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Deuce said:
Executive orders are usually just instructions to federal agencies to take specific actions regarding powers explicitly delegated to those agencies by Congress. The reason the EPA can create environmental regulation in the first place is because Congress passed laws saying they could. Because Congress can't be arsed to vote on each and every action taken by the numerous federal agencies. You never gave two ****s about executive orders until a (D) started doing it.

You guys need to make up your mind as to whether this is true or not.

,
While simultaneously being seen as weak by our enemies, of course.



No, supports freedom of the individual over the tyranny of the majority.


Ahh yes, the entire middle east is Obama/Hillary's fault. Don't blame the oppressive regimes forcing their people to rebel. Don't blame the people for rebellion. Obama did it.

Another right-wing blogger's canned lines, regurgitated here. Obama can implement certain aspects of treaties based on powers Congress has delegated to the executive branch. See EPA example. If Congress doesn't like executive control over certain things, they should take those powers back.



And Donald Trump will prove there are far more Republicans who do this.
Click to expand...

Actually the only way Trump proves that is if he wins...and neither of us really believe that is going to happen.

As for the rest of your comments and for brevity sake from the phone...lets just point out that all you are doing is excusing 'fascism' of your guy (cuz that blind partisan thing is kinda your gig). So...to use your own argument, you don't have a problem with fascists...as long as it's YOUR fascist. Right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

danarhea said:
Except David Schuster never said that.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
You owe him an apology.

The emboldened, enlarged, colored and underlined is what he quoted David Schuster having said.

jmotivator said:
BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clinton

Probably nothing, unless they know more about her health than we do.

@DavidSchuster - "Clarification from dem operatives @HillaryClinton pneumonia: Expect emergency DNC meeting to CONSIDER replacement."

Interesting times.
Click to expand...
Yet you want absurdly say he didn't do that.

Well here is a linked picture to the tweet in which he tweeted exactly that.

​
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

She will go the FDR route and do everything to conceal her illness before giving up her or the dem's best chance at election. If she did croak a month into winning the election, the party still keeps the power. That's all they care about, not integrity of the american government or honor or any such
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

trouble13 said:
Your making some very fair criticisms.

I don't think Obama is the complete disaster the right paints him as being but I do agree with them that he does shoulder a bunch of blame and he like every other past president has advanced the accumulation of power for the office. I blame congress for allowing him to do it and I blame congress for allowing depts like the eps setting regulations. Regulations should be recommended to congress, debated, and voted om


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There are some major issues with having Congress vote on each regulation. The biggest is time. There are simply too many actions taken by federal agencies for any one body of people to meaningfully debate and consider. The EPA might spend months, or years researching a particular topic before issuing just one recommendation. Can Congress really be expected to review all of that work.. every time? How informed is an elected lawyer's opinion on the cancer risks and associated costs of ethylene glycol exposure among airport ramp crews in deicing operations? How many NASA proposals would be met with glazed eyes because the the high school dropout Nebraska elected doesn't have a clue what they're talking about?

Sometimes people respond that there are just too many regulations, as if the number of regulations is somehow important rather than what they actually do. The world gets more complicated every year, and that's going to require constant updating of the rules. What, we're just going to decide to stop at some arbitrary number? Ok, that'll work out great when the Genetic Resequencing Gun hits the market and a six year old splices a cheetah with a great white shark and creates a terrifying high-speed land shark. Thanks, Timmy, now I have to bring a shotgun and body armor just to go get the mail.

In a less silly example, people always come up with a new way to game the system to enrich themselves at the expense of others. I know, I'll just package these thousands of loans together and say it's a "AAA credit rating loan package" even though it's actually mostly made up of monopoly money. Nothing could possibly go wrong. Whoops. That caused a problem. Now everyone's mad about it and scrutinizing home loans. I'll just do the same thing with car loans instead.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Deuce said:
No, it's proving that about you guys. You'll even vote for Donald Goddamned Trump if he's got an (R) next to his name
Click to expand...

Gary Johnson is way ahead of Jill Stein.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

trouble13 said:
I have not read the entire thread so my apologies if this has already been asked and answered.

If Clinton had to withdraw and the dems ran somebody else would that mean they would tone included on the lot because of registration rules?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

My understanding is that because the party has a spot on the ballot, they can change the candidate if need be. Otherwise we really wouldn't have a contingency for "meteor hits debate stage, no presidential candidates this year."

And ours is a country with written military strategies for repulsing an invasion from Canada.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! Jim Hoft? Seriously? No, really. Seriously?

The official Dumbest man on the Internet and believer/promoter of every idiotic conspiracy known to man.
Click to expand...
And the Gateway Pundit?! Seriously?! :shock:
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

danarhea said:
The link I gave you WAS Schuster's Twitter feed, and it doesn't say what you are claiming it says, despite your saying your **cough** source
Click to expand...


David Shuster's twitter feed.

Zip on down to his first post from 9/11/16 and tell me what you find.

Feel free to apologize.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Abbazorkzog said:
Joe Biden doesn't have brain damage.
Click to expand...

You'll believe any horse****, as long as it has a (D) behind it. :lamo
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Deuce said:
There are some major issues with having Congress vote on each regulation. The biggest is time. There are simply too many actions taken by federal agencies for any one body of people to meaningfully debate and consider. The EPA might spend months, or years researching a particular topic before issuing just one recommendation. Can Congress really be expected to review all of that work.. every time? How informed is an elected lawyer's opinion on the cancer risks and associated costs of ethylene glycol exposure among airport ramp crews in deicing operations? How many NASA proposals would be met with glazed eyes because the the high school dropout Nebraska elected doesn't have a clue what they're talking about?

Sometimes people respond that there are just too many regulations, as if the number of regulations is somehow important rather than what they actually do. The world gets more complicated every year, and that's going to require constant updating of the rules. What, we're just going to decide to stop at some arbitrary number? Ok, that'll work out great when the Genetic Resequencing Gun hits the market and a six year old splices a cheetah with a great white shark and creates a terrifying high-speed land shark. Thanks, Timmy, now I have to bring a shotgun and body armor just to go get the mail.

In a less silly example, people always come up with a new way to game the system to enrich themselves at the expense of others. I know, I'll just package these thousands of loans together and say it's a "AAA credit rating loan package" even though it's actually mostly made up of monopoly money. Nothing could possibly go wrong. Whoops. That caused a problem. Now everyone's mad about it and scrutinizing home loans. I'll just do the same thing with car loans instead.
Click to expand...
I would argue that yes i absolutely expect congress to vote on each and ever law that we are forced to live under. That is their job and it gives voters the ability to hold those making the laws accountable for them.

You also make a practicle argument that we can not realistically expect them to be well versed on so many regualtions. From a practle sense they are not well versed in what they vote on now. This is actually the same argument i use about why im against term limits.

Congress has a staff just like the potus. They read these bills and advise their congressman on how to vote. I would say if tere is too many regulations for the current staff i would expand tbe staff.

I dont expect congress to be experts i do expect them to make decissions based on their principles and the information their advisors give them.

Im only picking on the epa because you used them first but if they think we need to cut down emmisions they should submit a proposal to congress and let the staff review and debate it than vote on it. Its not suppose to be a fast process its supose to be a well thought out one.if its a good law than its worth waiting for.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

ARealConservative said:
Gary Johnson is way ahead of Jill Stein.
Click to expand...
Do you think johnson is a conservative alternative to trump?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

chromium said:
She will go the FDR route and do everything to conceal her illness before giving up her or the dem's best chance at election. If she did croak a month into winning the election, the party still keeps the power. That's all they care about, not integrity of the american government or honor or any such
Click to expand...

Wait, are you seriously arguing that Clinton is the best chance the Dem party has at winning the election?

Hillary Clinton Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

Tim Kaine Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

Joe Biden Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

Bernie Sanders Favorable Rating - Polls - HuffPost Pollster
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Deuce said:
My understanding is that because the party has a spot on the ballot, they can change the candidate if need be. Otherwise we really wouldn't have a contingency for "meteor hits debate stage, no presidential candidates this year."

And ours is a country with written military strategies for repulsing an invasion from Canada.
Click to expand...
I was just curious bevause thats the argument of why nobody can oppose these two so late in the race other than stein and johnson. Nobody else is registered to be on tje ballot and the windoe of time has closed.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

American said:
You'll believe any horse****, as long as it has a (D) behind it. :lamo
Click to expand...

Okay, find a (nonexistent) quote of mine supporting Hillary Clinton. :lol:
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Bob N said:
And the Gateway Pundit?! Seriously?! :shock:
Click to expand...

But...but...but...

HOW COULD HE NOT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!??!!??

Sometimes I hate how stupid my fellow citizens are.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

Abbazorkzog said:
Okay, find a (nonexistent) quote of mine supporting Hillary Clinton. :lol:
Click to expand...

Hahahaha, you were talking about Uncle Joe. I guess you support him.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

I know how right wingers and republicans must be having wet dreams about that, but in their stupidity, they're praying for their humiliation in November. If Trump had any chance of winning the elections, it'd be on the back of deeply unpopular and controversial Clinton. Pick any other decent democrat, especially Joe Biden, and Trump will get annihilated.

Here's a thought though, what if Trump - miraculously bypassing the thickets of stupidity festering in his mind - arrived at that conclusion, and by planting this story and spreading such rumors, he's trying to squander his chances of winning the presidency in order to properly monetize his candidacy?
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

ARealConservative said:
so thinking is hard for you
Click to expand...

Libertarian =/= Republican.
Green =/= Democrat
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

If some thing is posted which is shocking, unbelievable..........

It usually is...............

Party Down
The party can consider a replacement if Clinton chooses to drop out, but the DNC cannot oust her.
Democratic Party Holding Emergency Meeting to Discuss Replacing Hillary Clinton? : snopes.com
UNPROVEN
WHAT'S TRUE: While it's entirely possible the Democratic Party may in the future call a meeting to discuss replacing Hillary Clinton in the event she steps down as party nominee, no such meeting has yet been called.

WHAT'S FALSE: The DNC is not holding an "emergency" meeting to "replace" Clinton.


Never believe anything on the internet unless you can verify it as true from a respected and reliable sources...........
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

imyoda said:
If some thing is posted which is shocking, unbelievable..........

It usually is...............

Party Down
The party can consider a replacement if Clinton chooses to drop out, but the DNC cannot oust her.
Democratic Party Holding Emergency Meeting to Discuss Replacing Hillary Clinton? : snopes.com
UNPROVEN
WHAT'S TRUE: While it's entirely possible the Democratic Party may in the future call a meeting to discuss replacing Hillary Clinton in the event she steps down as party nominee, no such meeting has yet been called.

WHAT'S FALSE: The DNC is not holding an "emergency" meeting to "replace" Clinton.


Never believe anything on the internet unless you can verify it as true from a respected and reliable sources...........
Click to expand...

I see her slide seems to have abated somewhat too. 538 has her chances to win at over 60% again. Last week it dipped to below 59 from a high of 89% at teh end of August.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

calamity said:
I see her slide seems to have abated somewhat too. 538 has her chances to win at over 60% again. Last week it dipped to below 59 from a high of 89% at teh end of August.
Click to expand...

Fifty-Nine... you're ****ting me.
 
Re: BREAKING: Democrats May Hold Emergency Meeting to Consider Replacing Hillary Clin

calamity said:
I see her slide seems to have abated somewhat too. 538 has her chances to win at over 60% again. Last week it dipped to below 59 from a high of 89% at teh end of August.
Click to expand...

What polls have to do with this obvious falsehood escapes me.............

And since I could care less about who......... of the two most unpopular and trustworthy wins............I could care less about the polls.........and believe it silly to waste energy getting exercised by it......

But if you must know.......the best determinate of who will win the election.............are two internal measurements:

Who is believe to be most qualified fore the Office.......

And the I will never vote for him/her..........

If you can know that..........

........... you can be sure you have picked the winner weeks before he election occurs.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom