• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BP 'small people' comment causes anger along Gulf

Slartibartfast

Jesus loves you.
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
72,131
Reaction score
58,867
Location
NE Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
The Associated Press: BP 'small people' comment causes anger along Gulf

(emphasis added by Mega)


So what do you think? Was it a slip in translation (since this guy is obviously not a native english speaker) or was it condescension?


Personally, I think it was a little bit of both.
 
Last edited:
seems some are thinned skinned.. mustve been sheltered as kids..
*sniffle* my wishes hand isnt filling up as fast as the other hand *sniffle*


just pay the bills "big shot"..
 
seems some are thinned skinned.. mustve been sheltered as kids..
*sniffle* my wishes hand isnt filling up as fast as the other hand *sniffle*


just pay the bills "big shot"..

I don't know if you are assuming context where I am not picking it up or what, but I have no idea how to make sense of your comment.
 
well, the bloke does look pretty tall (he's the one on the left), so maybe he just assumes he's taller than all the people on the coast

 
well, the bloke does look pretty tall (he's the one on the left), so maybe he just assumes he's taller than all the people on the coast


A side note. I don't know if it is the photo, but those suits look awfully cheap. You would think that the heads of BP could afford better.
 
He's a foreigner. He's allowed one miscommunication per television interview.

For our homegrown Presidents we allow them five or the Bush established maximum of six.
 
I give him a slide on this - he doesn't speak English.

How many times have I made an ass out of myself when speaking German or Spanish? Quite a few! LOL More than a few - heck - why don't I still have my head buried in the sand?
 
They got lucky. He could have just said "**** those whiny little bitches" and then said that it was a communication error since English isn't his first language. :lol:
 
I don't know if you are assuming context where I am not picking it up or what, but I have no idea how to make sense of your comment.

i was a bit cryptic.. sorry i was in too big a hurry.
i mean to say that those who were offended from being referred to as "small people" mustve had it hard growing up.

im sure most people refer to the boss or someone in a company's leadership as "the big guy", "big shot", etc. at some point in their life.
to think opposing terms are not used by CEO's or by general persons in leadership position is a bit narrow.
 
Even if it's an accurate translation, I don't think it's really a big deal. I think this is the thought going through his head:

Critic: "You don't care about the little people, just the fat cats!"
Him: "We do care about the little people"

Seems pretty reasonable to me.
 
A side note. I don't know if it is the photo, but those suits look awfully cheap. You would think that the heads of BP could afford better.


BP chief an ops man who needs to show PR skills | Reuters

:mrgreen:
 

Man people need to get a life and a thicker skin. Here BP makes it clear they want to help the small people who are getting hurt first, and not the big corporations and politically back companies. What is so wrong with that?
 
I haven't seen any outrage. He was talking about the, "little man". You know, the one that the Dems are taking care of by killing what's left of our economy. Yeah, him.

All things considered, BP has done a helluva lot better job taking care of the, "small people", than the government has.
 
A side note. I don't know if it is the photo, but those suits look awfully cheap. You would think that the heads of BP could afford better.

I was thinking the same thing. :ninja: Minerva McGonagall looks good, though.
 
Bad translation, I'm guessing. And even if not, not something I'm going to get overly concerned about.

As long as they keep forking out the necessary funds to clean up the mess their rig made, I really don't give a **** WHAT they say.
 

You haven't seen any outrage? Must not have been looking. But then, you work in the oil industry, don't you?

Okaloosa defies Unified Command over East Pass plans | pass, command, plans - News - Northwest Florida Daily News

http://www.waltonsun.com/news/oil-4925-dwellers-answers.html
http://www.waltonsun.com/news/beach-4928-plan-sandestin.html

It's not just BP's words at this point. They are attempting to dictate how the cleanup will occur, and the feds are backing them in doing so. BP hasn't done a particularly good job to this point in time, so forgive me if folks in my neck of the woods don't trust them to handle things anymore.
 
Last edited:
How silly, people don't get upset when someone says Democrats look out for the little guy. But if a Brit from BP says we care about the small people, they are insulted.
 



Yes, I do work in the oilfield and I was referring to outrage about the, "small people" comment, which is what the thread is about; not about outrage over the spill itself.



I'm with you 98% on that. My peoples are pissed, too. They all see how the government has screwed the pooch on containment of the spill. BP is definitely at fault for the blowout, but the cluster **** response by the government is very apparent to most folks that I know.
 
It's easy to see it this way from a distance. However, if you were actually here, and you saw the arrogant, high-handed way that BP and the feds have treated this situation (in Florida, at least) then you might understand that "the small people" understand that BP is a big metanational corporation that has no legal right to be dictating ANY goddamn thing down here, and yet, they are attempting to control it all to their own advantage, while massively FUBARing our beaches, wildlife, fishing industries, and tourism.

I'm seriously starting to hate those ****ers. Don't buy the hype. They very much believe that we're "the small people" and that their interests are more important than anyone else's.

This is exactly what we get in a country where corporate interests trump those of citizens.
 
Yes, I do work in the oilfield and I was referring to outrage about the, "small people" comment, which is what the thread is about; not about outrage over the spill itself.

See my comment below yours.



The feds have allowed BP to dictate the terms of the cleanup. **** BP.
 
See my comment below yours.




The feds have allowed BP to dictate the terms of the cleanup. **** BP.

Therein lies the responsibility of the government. If BP was doing such a terrible job, the Hope-n-Change government should have swooped in to save the day.
 
Therein lies the responsibility of the government. If BP was doing such a terrible job, the Hope-n-Change government should have swooped in to save the day.

Oh, HopeNchange is on my **** list, too. No worries.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…