• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Blatant Election Interference

trixare4kids said:
Blatant election interference is an understatement. I thought Democrats hated election interference. :eek: Maybe they just love having control of the political scene more.
At any rate, seems apparent, Biden quite possibly would have lost the 2020 election had the NY Post investigative report on Hunter Biden's laptop were not censored by the Twitter speech cops.



And now we find out this...

Joe Biden agreed to pay Hunter's legal bills tied to Chinese firm deal: email​

From the first link:
Click to expand...
Biden won because Trumps an immoral fraudulent con man, and Americans dont like it when the United Nations laugh at the President of the United States.
 
trixare4kids said:
How about we stick to what we know?

Propaganda and censorship are the hallmarks of big tech giants who used their might to sway the 2020 election Joe's way? What a pity to find out after the election that Twitter tech censoring cops used their platform to swing an election.
How do we know this? 17% who voted for Biden wouldn't have done so if they had known the NY Post's investigative report on Hunter Biden's laptop wasn't Russian disinformation.

I don't care what side you're on or who you voted for, (that is yours, the collectives' choice), but everyone who says they want the integrity of Democracy to stay intact should be outraged at Big Tech's hand in the purposeful manipulation of the 2020 election.
Click to expand...
Good idea.

Yes. Yes, it is a pity.

Providing more information on how we know this…

amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story | @AmacforAmerica

President Donald Trump's embattled Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, has been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.
amac.us amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story​

snippet from article:
“Guess what? Had they known this story, Joe Biden would not have carried Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the Trump lead would have been definitive in North Carolina. Meaning what? Meaning that Donald Trump would have won 289 electoral votes and would be the re-elect president of the United States. ”
The article provides a transcript of the segment.
I agree.
 
trixare4kids said:
Dude? I don't feel like a dude. How sexist.

The point is, Twitter censorship cops had NO reason to ban anyone who discussed Hunter's Biden's laptop. Try and connect the dots.
Click to expand...

What a crock of shit from you, as usual. Twitter didn't ban anyone who discussed the private citizen's laptop. They stopped people from spreading the NY Post story until they confirmed it.

GeezusHChrist, how do you look at yourself in the mirror knowing how much you lie?
 
CharisRose said:
Good idea.

Yes. Yes, it is a pity.

Providing more information on how we know this…

amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story | @AmacforAmerica

President Donald Trump's embattled Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, has been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.
amac.us amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story​

snippet from article:
“Guess what? Had they known this story, Joe Biden would not have carried Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the Trump lead would have been definitive in North Carolina. Meaning what? Meaning that Donald Trump would have won 289 electoral votes and would be the re-elect president of the United States. ”
The article provides a transcript of the segment.
I agree.
Click to expand...

BWAHAHAH! Two conservatives jerking each other off, and you come here and spread the manure even further.

Holy shit, how pathetic.

"Who did you vote for Dad?"
"Why, Donald Trump, son!"
"Why'd you vote for him, Dad?"
"Joe Biden's son had a laptop!"
 
element94 said:
So does this also apply to the 2016 election with Russia's interference in favor of Trump?
Click to expand...

Did THAT get a pass in the media? I think not, else you would not have been able to bring it up.

I seem to recall a lot of press on not only that, but Russia Collusion, and every time some story about Russian contacts (Moscows Mayor, the Russian adoption agency contact alleging inside info which was really just an attempt to get financing/support for US adoptions, etc.) and "Trump-Russia" contacts.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Did THAT get a pass in the media? I think not, else you would not have been able to bring it up.

I seem to recall a lot of press on not only that, but Russia Collusion, and every time some story about Russian contacts (Moscows Mayor, the Russian adoption agency contact alleging inside info which was really just an attempt to get financing/support for US adoptions, etc.) and "Trump-Russia" contacts.
Click to expand...

Russian adoption agency? Holy shit.

Yes, the emails that promised Junior and Manafort dirt on Hillary Clinton came from a....Russian adoption agency.
 
CharisRose said:
Good idea.

Yes. Yes, it is a pity.

Providing more information on how we know this…

amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story | @AmacforAmerica

President Donald Trump's embattled Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, has been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.
amac.us amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story​

snippet from article:
“Guess what? Had they known this story, Joe Biden would not have carried Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the Trump lead would have been definitive in North Carolina. Meaning what? Meaning that Donald Trump would have won 289 electoral votes and would be the re-elect president of the United States. ”
The article provides a transcript of the segment.
I agree.
Click to expand...

I'm betting most here who voted for Biden, would have voted for him anyway knowing the above.
At least that's the way most of their pov(s) come across. ☹️
 
Rawley said:
Telling that you compare US big Tech to Russian agents
Click to expand...
I do here, and I did not say that I agree with big tech per se. You cannot condemn one and not the other and have credibility with concerns about "election interference".
 
Captain Adverse said:
Did THAT get a pass in the media? I think not, else you would not have been able to bring it up.

I seem to recall a lot of press on not only that, but Russia Collusion, and every time some story about Russian contacts (Moscows Mayor, the Russian adoption agency contact alleging inside info which was really just an attempt to get financing/support for US adoptions, etc.) and "Trump-Russia" contacts.
Click to expand...
That is very fair. See, I can say that. That's what I was looking for, consistency in the OP's views, which remains in doubt.
 
trixare4kids said:
Well, that's one theory.
Click to expand...
Biden got way more votes. That doesnt always mean the Republican gets defeated but it did this time. And Trumpists just cant wrap their minds around the idea that most Americans preferred Biden over their Dear Leader. There must be some underhanded, nefarious reason why DeeJay lost.
 
trixare4kids said:
Blatant election interference is an understatement. I thought Democrats hated election interference. :eek: Maybe they just love having control of the political scene more.
Click to expand...
Because all registered Dems were involved, right?
trixare4kids said:
At any rate, seems apparent, Biden quite possibly would have lost the 2020 election had the NY Post investigative report on Hunter Biden's laptop were not censored by the Twitter speech cops.
Click to expand...
Sure, trix, keep telling yourself that. 🙄
 
trixare4kids said:
Blatant election interference is an understatement. I thought Democrats hated election interference. :eek: Maybe they just love having control of the political scene more.
At any rate, seems apparent, Biden quite possibly would have lost the 2020 election had the NY Post investigative report on Hunter Biden's laptop were not censored by the Twitter speech cops.



And now we find out this...

Joe Biden agreed to pay Hunter's legal bills tied to Chinese firm deal: email​

From the first link:
Click to expand...
Gosh. Next we're going to find out that Joe bought his son a TGI Friday's gift card. When does it end?
 
element94 said:
I do here, and I did not say that I agree with big tech per se. You cannot condemn one and not the other and have credibility with concerns about "election interference".
Click to expand...
Good for you. Glad to see you condemn Twitter and, frankly, most of the US media for spiking that story to assist Biden
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Because all registered Dems were involved, right?

Sure, trix, keep telling yourself that. 🙄
Click to expand...

Could you send me the memo again where it states only Democrats and other assorted anti-Trump varieties can complain about election interference? I misplaced mine. ;)
 
CharisRose said:
Good idea.

Yes. Yes, it is a pity.

Providing more information on how we know this…

amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story | @AmacforAmerica

President Donald Trump's embattled Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, has been accused by three women of sexual misconduct.
amac.us amac.us

Bozell to Levin: Survey Shows 4.6% of Democrats Would Not Have Voted for Joe Biden Had They Known Hunter Biden Story​

snippet from article:
“Guess what? Had they known this story, Joe Biden would not have carried Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the Trump lead would have been definitive in North Carolina. Meaning what? Meaning that Donald Trump would have won 289 electoral votes and would be the re-elect president of the United States. ”
The article provides a transcript of the segment.
I agree.
Click to expand...
Far right, low credibility source citing the assertions of a far right, low credibility activist as proof of anything is pathetic.
 
Cardinal said:
Gosh. Next we're going to find out that Joe bought his son a TGI Friday's gift card. When does it end?
Click to expand...
$800K from the "poorest men in government, in Congress and as vice president."
 
And Newsbusters shared a graphic from its poll indicating that "17% of Biden voters would NOT have voted for him had they been aware of major news stories the media censored." They captioned the image, writing, "Couldn’t agree more."
Click to expand...

You might want to find a source that has the journalistic credibility of the National Enquirer, which is 6 points higher than Newsbusters.

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.


  • Overall, we rate Newsbusters Right Biased based on story selection that always favors the right. We also rate them borderline questionable due to the use of poor sources and numerous failed fact checks. One additional failed fact check will push this source by default onto the Questionable list.
Click to expand...

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Newsbusters - Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom