Clinton cares about other demorats, Obama does not; Clinton is history, Obama is histroic.
Clinton is a politician. Obama is an activist. It colors his world view in a totally different way than Clinton sees it.
If we don't trivialize "gun culture", then they shouldn't trivialize our concerns about guns and "gun culture." I have seen little evidence that those immersed in gun culture are even capable of taking my and others' concerns about guns seriously even when I and others talk to them respectfully and concede points. As such, I don't give a damn about their feelings.
This is why I'll never be a politician.
If we don't trivialize "gun culture", then they shouldn't trivialize our concerns about guns and "gun culture."
Oh please. All you're doing is displaying ignorance about me and my positions. Do me a favor and shut the **** up.Your problem is that you're purely political about guns, and have no real proof about your assertions. That's why they don't take you seriously. The people you call gun nuts grew up with guns and actually know WTF their talking about. You bring in thoughtful facts, and show genuine concern, they'll treat you different.
Totes. Me be concerned about people not dying from easily preventable accidents is totes trivial. Makes a lot of sense.That's because your asinine concerns about gun are trivial.
Bill Clinton is a much more savvy politician than Obama.
Totes. Me be concerned about people not dying from easily preventable accidents is totes trivial. Makes a lot of sense.
Recovery from what? My guy being re-elected and deciding policy for the next four years while the gun-nut losers prove the voters right? I'll take it.Good, acceptance is the first step towards recovery.
Obama wants a legacy for his term, Clinton doesn't want the Democrats that are up for election in 2014 to be creamed.
Oh please. All you're doing is displaying ignorance about me and my positions. Do me a favor and shut the **** up.
I haven't made a claim so there can't be absence of proof or weak assertions. Maybe you should shut the **** up too. I'm not in the mood for anymore bull****. And what coffin? The coffin of what internet cowboys think about me. Good riddance.Snort!
The dive into foul behavior and language is only driving nails in your own coffin.
Couple that with the absence of proof and weak assertions, and you lose again.
It's kind of interesting if you look at Obama's Senate history. He sponsored 137 bills and resolutions of which a whopping 8 passed and went on to become law or formalized resolutions. Of the 8 that got presidential approval 6 were resolutions recognizing a person or event. The other 2....one was a law to provide aid to the Congo and the other was a law regulating the transfer of elemental mercury. Every other bill or resolution he sponsored died.
He is, as I said before, an activist who would much prefer to dictate policy than legislate it and he has surrounded himself with others who are similarly inclined. His is a different kind of presidency than we have seen before and one which, God willing, we will never see again.
Recovery from what? My guy being re-elected and deciding policy for the next four years while the gun-nut losers prove the voters right? I'll take it.
Recovery from what? My guy being re-elected and deciding policy for the next four years while the gun-nut losers prove the voters right? I'll take it.
Recovery from what? My guy being re-elected and deciding policy for the next four years while the gun-nut losers prove the voters right? I'll take it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?