• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Biblical proof that Evolution is true

Questerr said:
Which means it’s easy to mistranslate things in English, as happened extensively with the King James Version.
Click to expand...
Example:

Strong's Concordance
ruach: breath, wind, spirit
Original Word: רוּחַ
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: ruach
Phonetic Spelling: (roo'-akh)
Definition: breath, wind, spirit

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from an unused word
Definition
breath, wind, spirit
NASB Translation
air (2), anger (1), blast (2), breath (31), breathless* (1), cool (1), courage (1), despondency* (1), exposed (1), grief* (1), heart (1), inspired (1), mind (3), motives (1), points (1), quick-tempered* (1), side (4), sides (2), Spirit (76), spirit (127), spirits (3), strength (1), temper (2), thoughts* (1), trustworthy* (1), wind (98), winds (7), windy (2), wrath (1).
 
CherubRam said:
Example:

Strong's Concordance
ruach: breath, wind, spirit
Original Word: רוּחַ
Part of Speech: Noun Feminine
Transliteration: ruach
Phonetic Spelling: (roo'-akh)
Definition: breath, wind, spirit

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from an unused word
Definition
breath, wind, spirit
NASB Translation
air (2), anger (1), blast (2), breath (31), breathless* (1), cool (1), courage (1), despondency* (1), exposed (1), grief* (1), heart (1), inspired (1), mind (3), motives (1), points (1), quick-tempered* (1), side (4), sides (2), Spirit (76), spirit (127), spirits (3), strength (1), temper (2), thoughts* (1), trustworthy* (1), wind (98), winds (7), windy (2), wrath (1).
Click to expand...

And there’s an entire body of Ancient Hebrew scholarship explaining which meaning was intended and why.
 
Manc Skipper said:
No mention of spirits in Matthew. Just a very high mountaintop.

"...Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;..."
Click to expand...
My mistake. I was thinking about the Dead Sea Scrolls.
 
CherubRam said:
You must be a Woman to make such a illogical statement.
Click to expand...

According to you, the English language defines words very narrowly. I'll accept that.

Do you accept that your statement can only be defined then, as ignorantly misogynistic? After all, it's incorrect.

Evidence: my post here is completely logical, and based on your own words.
 
CherubRam said:
The people who do the translating do not always translate correctly.
Click to expand...

Very true, that's why so many of those claiming to be writing God's Word in the scriptures didnt always get it right either. Sometimes they misinterpreted, sometimes they were mistaken, sometimes they changed things to fit their own agendas.

Fortunately, God's Message, overall, does shine thru in the Bible.
 
Questerr said:
And you have to admit that seeing the entire earth from a very tall mountaintop requires a flat earth.
Click to expand...
For proof, why don't you go and take some pictures of ships going over the edge.
 
Lursa said:
Very true, that's why so many of those claiming to be writing God's Word in the scriptures didnt always get it right either. Sometimes they misinterpreted, sometimes they were mistaken, sometimes they changed things to fit their own agendas.

Fortunately, God's Message, overall, does shine thru in the Bible.
Click to expand...
I agree with you 100%
 
Lursa said:
According to you, the English language defines words very narrowly. I'll accept that.

Do you accept that your statement can only be defined then, as ignorantly misogynistic? After all, it's incorrect.

Evidence: my post here is completely logical, and based on your own words.
Click to expand...
I am not stupid, I am aware that there are Women who are exceptional when it comes to logic.
 
Sweden said:
A logical British/Swedish dual national.
Click to expand...
As a matter of fact Evolution in this universe is a falsehood, so therefore God is a matter of fact.

Evolution

Evolution is Spontaneous generation or abiogenesis, how living things originally arose from non-living material. The reason Evolution is called a theory is because it is a speculation that is not evident to this day. The argument that mutations is evidence for Evolution is not valid, because there is no evidence of one species becoming another. And that is why the links are missing. It is noted that in the fossilized rock strata, that while one group of species suddenly died out, another suddenly came into existence. Bones from dinosaurs that were not identified as such were carbon dated from 12,000 years to 6,000 years. There has also been a recent discovery of live tissue, found in a dinosaur tooth that was dated to be millions of years old.
 
Artistic depictions of life forms changing over times is not scientific proof of Evolution. If evolution was true, then why are the oldest life forms still the same today?
 
Lursa said:
"Facts not in evidence, you Honor!"


You should instead be aware that men and women express logic equally. Unless you'd like to source your belief?
Click to expand...
I know nothing of that study.
 
CherubRam said:
As a matter of fact Evolution in this universe is a falsehood, so therefore God is a matter of fact.
Click to expand...
Go ahead and provide evidence to discredit evolution and prove god is a fact then!
CherubRam said:
Evolution

Evolution is Spontaneous generation or abiogenesis, how living things originally arose from non-living material. The reason Evolution is called a theory is because it is a speculation that is not evident to this day. The argument that mutations is evidence for Evolution is not valid, because there is no evidence of one species becoming another. And that is why the links are missing. It is noted that in the fossilized rock strata, that while one group of species suddenly died out, another suddenly came into existence. Bones from dinosaurs that were not identified as such were carbon dated from 12,000 years to 6,000 years. There has also been a recent discovery of live tissue, found in a dinosaur tooth that was dated to be millions of years old.
Click to expand...
That demonstrates a profound ignorance of evolution, and probably science in general. Evolution and abiogenesis are two different things.
CherubRam said:
Artistic depictions of life forms changing over times is not scientific proof of Evolution. If evolution was true, then why are the oldest life forms still the same today?
Click to expand...
A statement like that only proves one's lack of knowledge and understanding of evolution.
CherubRam said:
I am not stupid,
Click to expand...
Your statements regarding evolution indicate otherwise.
CherubRam said:
For proof, why don't you go and take some pictures of ships going over the edge.
Click to expand...
For proof, provide a picture of god!
 
Questerr said:
No, they weren’t. The Hebrews absolutely were not a notable seafaring civilization.
Click to expand...
Joshua 24:3
But I took your father Abraham from the land beyond the Euphrates and led him throughout Canaan and gave him many descendants. I gave him Isaac,

Abraham came from the area of Turkey and Sweden. Anyway, from the Germanic tribes.
 
CherubRam said:
Joshua 24:3
But I took your father Abraham from the land beyond the Euphrates and led him throughout Canaan and gave him many descendants. I gave him Isaac,

Abraham came from the area of Turkey and Sweden. Anyway, from the Germanic tribes.
Click to expand...

The "land beyond the Euphrates" is Mesopotamia. Abraham did NOT come from the "area of Turkey and Sweden".

Are you one of those neo-Nazis who thinks white people are the "true Israelites"?
 
Questerr said:
The "land beyond the Euphrates" is Mesopotamia. Abraham did NOT come from the "area of Turkey and Sweden".
Click to expand...

Questerr said:
Are you one of those neo-Nazis who thinks white people are the "true Israelites"?
Click to expand...

His geographical skills are lacking too. "Sweden and Turkey area" covers several thousand square miles of Europe!
 
CherubRam said:
Artistic depictions of life forms changing over times is not scientific proof of Evolution. If evolution was true, then why are the oldest life forms still the same today?
Click to expand...

Simple, because there were no environmental pressures to favor new or different genes. They are adequately adapted to their current habitats. And it's not 'all the oldest life forms,' it's just some that have not changed.
 
Lursa said:
that's why so many of those claiming to be writing God's Word in the scriptures didnt always get it right either. Sometimes they misinterpreted, sometimes they were mistaken, sometimes they changed things to fit their own agendas.
Click to expand...
lol...they sure do...

d3671850a8c5b1c19a5801de5b3a1825.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom