- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Messages
- 9,999
- Reaction score
- 17,495
- Location
- New England, United States
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Why allow him to bully you? Who is he to decide what is human? Is his sperm human? Only if he is Roman Catholic. "Every sperm is sacred" and all that.Yes, human, but not people. Not until they're born.
Why allow him to bully you? Who is he to decide what is human? Is his sperm human? Only if he is Roman Catholic. "Every sperm is sacred" and all that.
From the article:
Actress Bette Midler called for women to refuse to have sex to protest Texas’s recently enacted abortion law and suggested that Congress should guarantee abortion rights for women. “I suggest that all women refuse to have sex with men until they are guaranteed the right to choose by Congress,” Midler tweeted Thursday.
Source: https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kn...ls-on-women-to-refuse-sex-amid-texas-abortion
Um, wouldn’t that make “all women” political prostitues?
Because that's relevant to the conversation.You can't withhold sex from rapists.
In support of this cause, I swear not to have sex with Bette Midler.From the article:
Actress Bette Midler called for women to refuse to have sex to protest Texas’s recently enacted abortion law and suggested that Congress should guarantee abortion rights for women. “I suggest that all women refuse to have sex with men until they are guaranteed the right to choose by Congress,” Midler tweeted Thursday.
Source: https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kn...ls-on-women-to-refuse-sex-amid-texas-abortion
Um, wouldn’t that make “all women” political prostitues?
Some of the things that you said above were fact, were actually opinion. I would not quibble with you about what you said, but many people would.I do believe that the fertilized embryo is human. I don't merely believe it -- I know it. It's science. The embryo is one stage of human development. A sperm is not a stage of human development. It is something that can start that development if it meets up with an egg. But the embryo IS human.
Nevertheless, the embryo is not a _person_. Human, yes. Person no. That is a very important distinction.
Personally, I can't imagine any male wanting to have sex with her on a good day unless he was desperate.Getting back to the thread topic, Bette Midler said...blah, blah, but-blah-BLAH...blah...
She's just another irrelevant has been of a "star" hoping someone notices her.
That has no relevance to her opinion on using the withholding of sexual relations as a strategy for fighting for a cause. Women do not have to be physically attractive or sexually appealing in order to have worthwhile opinions.Personally, I can't imagine any male wanting to have sex with her on a good day unless he was desperate.
Oh yes it does. That dingbat is calling for women across the country to deny their significant other sex over something they have nothing to do with. It is asininely absurd. Her opinion has no relevance.That has no relevance to her opinion on using the withholding of sexual relations as a strategy for fighting for a cause. Women do not have to be physically attractive or sexually appealing in order to have worthwhile opinions.
True enough. And there is no doubt that withholding sex is a time-honored strategy that requires no other "cause" than the hope of modifying your significant other's other behaviors. Still, not employing a strategy would be nice, wouldn't it?That has no relevance to her opinion on using the withholding of sexual relations as a strategy for fighting for a cause. Women do not have to be physically attractive or sexually appealing in order to have worthwhile opinions.
Seriously?True enough. And there is no doubt that withholding sex is a time-honored strategy that requires no other "cause" than the hope of modifying your significant other's other behaviors. Still, not employing a strategy would be nice, wouldn't it?
And as someone who recognizes that abstinence means fewer aborted babies, I say, "Listen to good old Bette!"
Never mind that for women with a healthy and happy sexual relationship with their partners, they're "cutting off their noses to spite their faces."
That has no relevance to her opinion on using the withholding of sexual relations as a strategy for fighting for a cause. Women do not have to be physically attractive or sexually appealing in order to have worthwhile opinions.
Oh yes it does. That dingbat is calling for women across the country to deny their significant other sex over something they have nothing to do with. It is asininely absurd. Her opinion has no relevance.
You can't withhold sex from rapists.
Considering that many men in this country firmly believe it's their wife's duty to have sex with them whether their wife wants to or not and some courts have ruled it's not rape in such instances, plus the fact that neither rape nor incest are grounds for having an abortion under this TX law, I'd say it's very relevant.Because that's relevant to the conversation.
From the article:
Actress Bette Midler called for women to refuse to have sex to protest Texas’s recently enacted abortion law and suggested that Congress should guarantee abortion rights for women. “I suggest that all women refuse to have sex with men until they are guaranteed the right to choose by Congress,” Midler tweeted Thursday.
Source: https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kn...ls-on-women-to-refuse-sex-amid-texas-abortion
Um, wouldn’t that make “all women” political prostitues?
i didn't think lack of sex would affect many Trump Republicans 40yo and older. hell, they probably weren't getting any anyway.
Bette should have called for their wives to START having sex with them again. at least then they wouldn't be so angry all the time.
it was actually a rude and crude joke.Calling sexism and misogyny against a certain class of women!
it was actually a rude and crude joke.
you think you can still handle that stuff or are you doing the snowflake stuff now.
we're literally in a thread about having all women in Texas to stop having sex with their husbands/boyfriends. you think that's actually happening?You should have said that when you made the sexist and misogynist remarks about a certain class of women.
Like mandatory vaccines?Foul. Two minutes for trying to dismiss what your party does by blaming it solely on texas. These are your folks passing these kinds of laws and more are lined up and ready to pass their own draconian restrictions.
Trix was right. The Texas law is an abomination, but it isn't an excuse to denigrate women in a class you do not like simply because they are women.we're literally in a thread about having all women in Texas to stop having sex with their husbands/boyfriends. you think that's actually happening?
ps: let me know what jokes don't hurt your feeling now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?