Ah BW, I'm just not going to spoon feed this to you, if you cannot on your own read the highlighted section of the definition....and then read the highlighted section from WFBJr...and then either conclude it is or object it is not racism, then we are at an impasse.
LMAO. It's not really a good debate technique, but you score extra points for the condescension. If you can't look at LeBron's stat sheet and tell he's the greatest player of all time, then we are at an impasse.
See how that works?
You haven't really presented an argument. What you've done is throw a couple of premises together and ask your audience to provide the conclusion. It's a particularly bad way to argue because we're dealing with interpretation of a text and you've (coincidentally?) chosen a version of the text that leaves out important context. Will was certainly talking about white culture, not white racial superiority. Cutting out that context makes your wanna-be argument look better superficially, but that appearance is based on deception.
I see this time and time again on discussion boards. It is always the implied argument that the text needs no interpretation because the meaning is self-evidently what the argument needs it to mean.
I can answer your argument (such as it is) by merely highlighting a different part of Will's statement.
"The central question that emerges-and it is not a parliamentary question or a question that is answered by merely consulting a catalogue of the rights of American citizens,
born Equal-is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not pre-dominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes-the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race. It is not easy, and it is unpleasant, to adduce statistics evidencing the
median cultural superiority of White over Negro: but it is a fact that obtrudes, one that cannot be hidden by ever-so-busy egalitarians and anthropologists. The question, as far as the White community is concerned, is whether the claims of civilization supersede those of universal suffrage."
Is "Born equal" a premise of genetic racial superiority?
Is cultural superiority the same as or even directly related to genetic racial superiority?
Are all cultures effectively equal?
If you are capable of arguing your position, I expect you to answer the questions. They expose the equivocation that serves as the core of your abbreviated argument.
Or you can dodge.
The acceptance or rejection has to be something you produce, I cannot move your fingers across the keyboard for you.
"Yeah, I'm done with my argument" would have taken you less time and effort and dispensed with any need to indulge in personal attacks.
