• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are we ready for 10 more years of wrath from the eternal Woman Scorned?

US Conservative

US Conservative

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Messages
33,522
Reaction score
10,826
Location
Between Athens and Jerusalem
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
3_102015_dem-2016-clinton-3-48201_c0-227-2845-1885_s561x327.jpg


No, Madam Secretary, we do NOT want to know about your yoga habits! Hillary Clinton’s press performance Tuesday afternoon was, truly, everything Americans could have hoped for from our former First Lady, Modern Joan of Arc, Lady Macbeth, Senate carpetbagger and eternal public Woman Scorned.

Read more: CHARLES HURT: Hillary Clinton press conference a political performance preview - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
America, are you ready for 10 — TEN! — more years of political Hurt Locker? Because that is exactly what we are about to get. Ten more YEARS of deafening shock, trauma, stifled talk-show screams, political slow motion, scandal, faraway voices, incomprehensible movements.



Read more: CHARLES HURT: Hillary Clinton press conference a political performance preview - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Click to expand...

I for one am not. After 8 years of hope and change who wants this?

SNL was great about it...
 
We'll never know, drowned out by the constant whining from the right.
 
Washington Times, LOL
 
US Conservative said:
Lots of people besides the right aren't happy with her.
Click to expand...

Perhaps, but it is the CONs who rant and rave over all things Clinton.... :roll:

If she was so dismissible and her lead will evaporate by election time then why all the fuss and feathers from CONdom? :confused:
 
US Conservative said:
Clinton has name recognition and being the only viable candidate for her party lending to that. She's only up by 7? I'd have expected it to be higher.
Wait until election time. :cool:
Click to expand...



She is not up by 7% within the party. I have seen no polls of registered democrats, and in fact no poll gives out whether any of the polled are sure they will vote.

So far, we are dealing with brand recognition. "Who Clinton? Yeah, it was good then, I'd vote for him."

Hillary will be a front runner if and when she declares, so long as she plays peek-a-boo she's not even a candidate and whatever we're dealing with is no more than a popularity straw poll
 
notquiteright said:
Perhaps, but it is the CONs who rant and rave over all things Clinton.... :roll:

If she was so dismissible and her lead will evaporate by election time then why all the fuss and feathers from CONdom? :confused:
Click to expand...

No fuss here-just constant reminders of what a poor choice she is. Run the old bag if you'd like-just dont expect any enthusiasm, especially after what will be 8 years of hope and change.
 
Fearandloathing said:
She is not up by 7% within the party. I have seen no polls of registered democrats, and in fact no poll gives out whether any of the polled are sure they will vote.

So far, we are dealing with brand recognition. "Who Clinton? Yeah, it was good then, I'd vote for him."

Hillary will be a front runner if and when she declares, so long as she plays peek-a-boo she's not even a candidate and whatever we're dealing with is no more than a popularity straw poll
Click to expand...

Well stated. She's stale, old, and tired before she even gets into the game.
 
US Conservative said:
She's going to lose, but I welcome you running a loser.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...



The GOP is going to lose mainly because the old White men who run the GOP will run a hard-right conservative who will attract few votes from minority groups and women.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
 
Last edited:
US Conservative said:
Clinton has name recognition and being the only viable candidate for her party lending to that. She's only up by 7? I'd have expected it to be higher.
Wait until election time. :cool:
Click to expand...
Yeah, can't tell much of anything this far out. At this point in her last election (March 2007) Clinton and Giuliani had commanding, double-digit leads over Obama and McCain, and were basically tied in a head-to-head matchup.

Clinton the inevitable, with the 20+ point leads became Clinton the also-ran just a few months later.
 
shrubnose said:
The GOP is going to lose mainly because the old White men who run the GOP will run a hard-right conservative who will attract few votes from minority groups and women.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
Click to expand...

I think Dems need to keep harping on this demographic thing... I mean, it's driving middle and working class whites out of their party at an increasing pace... but as it's obvious they don't like white people in their party, they won't be missed.
 
shrubnose said:
The GOP is going to lose mainly because the old White men who run the GOP will run a hard-right conservative who will attract few votes from minority groups and women.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
Click to expand...

Yawn. More identity politics from the party of mediocrity.
 
US Conservative said:
Well stated. She's stale, old, and tired before she even gets into the game.
Click to expand...



I posted earlier that we have seen 18 Stanley cups and four Winter Olympics since she became a national figure. To emerging voters she must appear to them like "I Love Lucy" did to me....irrelevant
 
Fearandloathing said:
I posted earlier that we have seen 18 Stanley cups and four Winter Olympics since she became a national figure. To emerging voters she must appear to them like "I Love Lucy" did to me....irrelevant
Click to expand...

At least I love Lucy is funny.

Hillary is a beast.

hillary-rodham-clinton-beautiful-ugly-demotivational-poster-1253554080.gif


Wait till younger voters find out about her baggage.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom