Are guns a problem in the US?

[shrubnose]

You mean after the great war?

No,after the demographic change that's going on in the USA right now takes full effect.

The clock is ticking.

No one can stop time and/or change.

 

[RetiredUSN]

No,after the demographic change that's going on in the USA right now takes full effect.

The clock is ticking.

No one can stop time and/or change.

And neither party can own any demographic for very long. Nobody knows what will develop. Certain events can change a party base drastically in a very short period of time..

 

[Crimefree]

And neither party can own any demographic for very long. Nobody knows what will develop. Certain events can change a party base drastically in a very short period of time..

Actually Obama showed it was possible to ride to victory on the have nots who have discovered they can vote themselves largess. Social interventions are seen as desirable by an increasingly larger percentage willing to sacrifice rights to suck on governments teat. Perhaps this election will show that conclusively with the support Clinton is receiving and many willing to ignore her anti-rights agenda. Obama's meddling in the economy and social services is paying off. Votes count and people get the government they deserve which may not be what is best for the country.

It's kinda far from guns being a problem though and does not bode well for that right problem or not.

 

[Manc Skipper]

:lol:

A better plan would be to raise our voices in objection to gun controls lies and deliberate demonisation of firearm owners. A better plan would be to realise this is a fight over public safety and reassure citizens guns (not gun owners) represent no danger to them. That criminals the government has not arrested and charged do.

People with guns who want to pick a fight with unarmed folk are no danger to them? I'm so not reassured.

 

[shrubnose]

And neither party can own any demographic for very long.

Nobody knows what will develop. Certain events can change a party base drastically in a very short period of time..

Come back and tell us all about it in about 40 years.

That's not very long compared to the age of the universe.

:lol:

But I predict that by then the GOP will have been reduced to a fraction of its current size and will have little national power.

Wait and see.The clock is ticking.

 

[TurtleDude]

The real waste of time in the USA is all of the GOPers dreaming that they'll ever control what Democrats do.




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch,running out of time, GOP.

actually its European socialists dreaming that the USA will turn into another Eurosocialist has been nation

 

[TurtleDude]

Come back and tell us all about it in about 40 years.

That's not very long compared to the age of the universe.

:lol:

But I predict that by then the GOP will have been reduced to a fraction of its current size and will have little national power.

Wait and see.The clock is ticking.

well the public teat sucklers are breeding faster than the productive citizens

 

[haymarket]

Or vise versa. Liberals want to change the right by rewriting Websters Dictionary, and have been doing it for a very long time/

Can you provide a few examples of this claim?

 

[chuckiechan]

Guns aren't the problem, certain demographics are.

Certain people commit an out-sized amount of the crime, just like tobacco smokers and obesity drive up the cost of health care.

Certain people are an individual crime wave until they are arrested or killed, and that is typically done with a firearm.

Leave me and my guns out of the equation, please. I need to defend myself against these idiots.

 

[joG]

No,after the demographic change that's going on in the USA right now takes full effect.

The clock is ticking.

No one can stop time and/or change.

I wonder, whether the demographic shift will be in time to see how it plays out. I am more concerned with the midterm international developments. The game structure forming could easily mean a third great war., which would have an even larger impact on population size and composition than any of the present demographic movement.

 

[shrubnose]

I wonder, whether the demographic shift will be in time to see how it plays out.

I am more concerned with the midterm international developments. The game structure forming could easily mean a third great war., which would have an even larger impact on population size and composition than any of the present demographic movement.

It will be quite a while before it happens but I plan on sticking around to see it.We're looking at a little less than a 50 year wait.

Start learning about it here:Demographic trends shaping US politics in 2016 and beyond | Pew Research Center




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch,running out of time,GOP.

 

[Crimefree]

It will be quite a while before it happens but I plan on sticking around to see it.We're looking at a little less than a 50 year wait.

Start learning about it here:Demographic trends shaping US politics in 2016 and beyond | Pew Research Center

"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch,running out of time,GOP.

You might want to look at the changing political bias as the the disparity between rich and poor increases. That will introduce a social bias as well as a increasing number of dissatisfied and disenfranchised people in a shift to socialism which is always paid for with rights. Increased poverty means greater crime higher taxes to pay for social grants and schemes.... which is the most unsatisfactory answer there is but typical of government dependent on those votes.

 

[shrubnose]

You might want to look at the changing political bias as the the disparity between rich and poor increases. That will introduce a social bias as well as a increasing number of dissatisfied and disenfranchised people in a shift to socialism which is always paid for with rights.

Increased poverty means greater crime higher taxes to pay for social grants and schemes.... which is the most unsatisfactory answer there is but typical of government dependent on those votes

.

"Government exists to protect us from each other.Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~ Ronald Reagan

I don't agree with everything that Reagan said but he did hit the nail on the head a few times.

:lol:

 

[Crimefree]

"Government exists to protect us from each other.Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~ Ronald Reagan

I don't agree with everything that Reagan said but he did hit the nail on the head a few times.

:lol:

I would not believe the word of a politician describing what governments are for. I know that the only currency of politics is power.

 

[shrubnose]

I would not believe the word of a politician describing what governments are for.

I know that the only currency of politics is power.

If you're not going to learn about politics from politicians then who are to learn about politics from?

Fill us in.

:lol:

Those who know nothing can't teach much.

 

[Crimefree]

If you're not going to learn about politics from politicians then who are to learn about politics from?

Fill us in.

:lol:

Those who know nothing can't teach much.

Asinine

WTF do you think this means?

I know that the only currency of politics is power.

What more do you need to know?

 

[shrubnose]

Asinine

WTF do you think this means?

I know that the only currency of politics is power.

What more do you need to know?

I don't need to hear any more of your gobbledegook.

You can post it where the sun doesn't shine.

:lol:

Have a nice millisecond.

 

[David_N]

Guns aren't a problem, idiots are.

 

[TurtleDude]

Guns aren't a problem, idiots are.

partially true, some criminals are not idiots and rather intelligent-sadly the Democrat party spends too much time trying to impose laws that disarm good people and not the idiots or criminals

 

[Crimefree]

I don't need to hear any more of your gobbledegook.

You can post it where the sun doesn't shine.

:lol:

Have a nice millisecond.

It is not my fault if YOU cannot understand how principles work or that I don't buy into other idiotic beliefs.

I believe that place is being occupied by a huge turd trying to polish itself.

 

[Crimefree]

partially true, some criminals are not idiots and rather intelligent-sadly the Democrat party spends too much time trying to impose laws that disarm good people and not the idiots or criminals

Most criminals are not idiots or they do not last long. Petty criminals on the other hand..... either learn fast or get caught.

Whichever way as you say it it is completely idiotic to think criminals who break the law will obey the law. Which probably means criminals are mostly smarter than citizens demanding such stupid laws.

 

[shrubnose]

]It is not my fault if YOU cannot understand how principles work or that I don't buy into other idiotic beliefs.

I believe that place is being occupied by a huge turd trying to polish itself.

[/B]

And I believe that you are psychologically projecting your problems onto other people.

You might need to get some professional help.

 

[Manc Skipper]

90 Americans every day might think guns were a problem, but they can't, having been shot dead. Ten 911's every year, because guns.

 

[TurtleDude]

90 Americans every day might think guns were a problem, but they can't, having been shot dead. Ten 911's every year, because guns.

since the majority of those are suicides your rant has no relevance. and the majority of murders are committed by and upon felons, your desire to ban guns is silly.

so claiming suicides are the same as terrorist attacks or felons being killed by other felons-like almost everything else you post on guns-is just plain erroneous

 

[flogger]

Guns aren't a problem.

People who misuse guns are a big problem.

Call me picky but I'd call a half million gun deaths since the turn of the century a big problem and one thats not reflected in any other developed society