- Joined
- Dec 18, 2021
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
If one is an atheist, then they can't believe in any mythical notions (whether archaic chivalry or contemporary women's rights) anymore than they can in a God. If they do, then it's solely based on faith and the appropriation of religious and cultural values which form our notions of women's rights.
Rather, if atheist wanted to rape a woman to increase their odds of succeeding at "natural selection", there is no reason not to do it either, since atheism is naught but a moral vacuum in which any "Christian" notions of rights or respect for women are no more than faith-based whims.
This is likely why rates of rape and sexual harassment (such as in infamous sex scandals such as ones including Lawrence Krauss or Richard Carrier) are high among the so-called "atheist community", as well as why incel groups, pro-pedophilia groups, and other sexual deviance groups are overwhelmingly atheistic compared to the general populace. As well as the popularity of evil atheists such as the Marquis de Sade, who wrote literature with pro-rape, pro-pedophilia content.
An atheist, just like the feral beast, has no reason not to use his "male sexual aggression" to rape and physically "dominate" women, if he is unable to meet society's minimum standards of a consentual relationship (and given how ugly the average "internet atheist is", I'm sure they have a much harder time finding consensual romance than most comparatively normal people do). Much as how "male sexual aggression" is scientifically documented in the animal kingdom, an male atheist likewise has no reason not to rape, murder, molest or act otherwise violent and bestial if he believe it's in his "evolutionary advantage" to do so.
www.livescience.com
So in conclusion, there is no such thing as an "atheist feminist" beyond an oxymoron. Every atheist is a rapist or potential predator by default unless he recants his atheism and adopts religious or faith-based values that provide for respect for women. In this sense, the atheist is possibly a greater danger to women and any notion of rights for women than radical Islam is - since even in radical Islamist societies, rapists are harshly punished, but in the bestial mind and world of the atheist - rape isn't a vice at all, rather than something to be lusted and salivated over much as any feral ape who couldn't conceive of higher virtues or morality beyond it's bestial instincts and impulses would.
Rather, if atheist wanted to rape a woman to increase their odds of succeeding at "natural selection", there is no reason not to do it either, since atheism is naught but a moral vacuum in which any "Christian" notions of rights or respect for women are no more than faith-based whims.
This is likely why rates of rape and sexual harassment (such as in infamous sex scandals such as ones including Lawrence Krauss or Richard Carrier) are high among the so-called "atheist community", as well as why incel groups, pro-pedophilia groups, and other sexual deviance groups are overwhelmingly atheistic compared to the general populace. As well as the popularity of evil atheists such as the Marquis de Sade, who wrote literature with pro-rape, pro-pedophilia content.
An atheist, just like the feral beast, has no reason not to use his "male sexual aggression" to rape and physically "dominate" women, if he is unable to meet society's minimum standards of a consentual relationship (and given how ugly the average "internet atheist is", I'm sure they have a much harder time finding consensual romance than most comparatively normal people do). Much as how "male sexual aggression" is scientifically documented in the animal kingdom, an male atheist likewise has no reason not to rape, murder, molest or act otherwise violent and bestial if he believe it's in his "evolutionary advantage" to do so.
Male Sexual Aggression: What Chimps Can Reveal About People
Male chimpanzees who are more violent toward females tend to sire more offspring, which may provide insights into human sexual aggression.
So in conclusion, there is no such thing as an "atheist feminist" beyond an oxymoron. Every atheist is a rapist or potential predator by default unless he recants his atheism and adopts religious or faith-based values that provide for respect for women. In this sense, the atheist is possibly a greater danger to women and any notion of rights for women than radical Islam is - since even in radical Islamist societies, rapists are harshly punished, but in the bestial mind and world of the atheist - rape isn't a vice at all, rather than something to be lusted and salivated over much as any feral ape who couldn't conceive of higher virtues or morality beyond it's bestial instincts and impulses would.
