- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
- Messages
- 43,134
- Reaction score
- 16,114
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Is it rational? Why is there so much coverage on it as compared to other countries that are worse? Why are there so many U.N. resolutions against Israel? Why does Israel responding to being rocketed all the time get so much angst? What country in the entire world would put up with what Israel has without going well beyond Israel's response? Why does conflicts with Israel end up with Jews being attacked in the U.S.?Anti-Semitism is irrational prejudicial and bigoted behaviour and ideas directed at Jews because of who they are and what they choose to believe in. Criticism of the State of Israel is based on the rational, reasoned and dispassionate analysis and follow-on disapproval of some of the State of Israel's policies.
This doesn't make sense. Are you saying the Jews being attacked are mobsters? If so, why are you OK with random vigilantes going after them instead of the police?Was hunting down the Amberg brothers, Meyer Lansky or Dutch Shultz anti-Semitism? Of course not. It was based on their illegal behaviours as gangsters and assassins. They were attacked for what they did, not for who they worshipped or who their mothers were.
They "flaunt" it? How to they flaunt it? Also, are you saying that Israel should just take rocket attacks and do nothing?When the State of Israel is brutal, flaunts international law, expands its borders by force or attacks neighbouring countries, then it gets criticised, no different from Syria, Russia, America, France, China, Saudi Arabia or any other misbehaving state.
I think your post did an excellent job at proving my point.This thread is a load of crap intent on trying to stifle legitimate criticism of the State of Israel for some of its most problematic policies. Individuals, groups, nations and states must be held accountable for their actions, regardless of their history or the harms done to their ancestors or oldest members. Actions, not identity, determines the validity of legitimate criticism.
Not pointing out other regimes' atrocities constantly while critising a certain regime is not the issue either. Some regimes are dead-ender regimes which are beyond the hope of redemption by criticism alone, so there is little point in criticising such regimes. However some regimes have the potential to correct their own abuses and thus focusing on them is the pragmatic and utilitarian focusing of criticism where it has a chance of working and doing some good. North Korea is a dead-ender state but the State of Israel still has hope.
Be well.
Evilroddy.