And Fox is at it again...

[PeteEU]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luNheD4DGr8&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube- Fox News' misleading Palin crowd shot[/ame]

Seriously a week away from Jon Stewart exposing Hannity and they pull this?

"these pictures just in"... yea a year ago from a Presidential campaign rally...:roll:

 

[Grim17]

Nice try... But you people need to do a better job of editing... Or how about this... How about you liberals stop lying and try being honest for a change?

 

[Captain America]

YouTube- Fox News' misleading Palin crowd shot

Seriously a week away from Jon Stewart exposing Hannity and they pull this?

"these pictures just in"... yea a year ago from a Presidential campaign rally...:roll:

Even after all the recent light shown on FOXNews for what it is (even though most of us knew this years ago :roll I have to say that I am not the least bit surprised. Further, I am not the least bit surprised that all the FOXNews apologists will deny the obvious and resort to viotrol and condensending insults to divert the attention and focus off the topic of FOXNew's blatant propaganda and shift it to a flamefest instead. Works for them a lot.

Some things just never change. :roll:

 

[Grim17]

Even after all the recent light shown on FOXNews for what it is (even though most of us knew this years ago :roll I have to say that I am not the least bit surprised. Further, I am not the least bit surprised that all the FOXNews apologists will deny the obvious and resort to viotrol and condensending insults to divert the attention and focus of the topic of FOXNew's blatant propaganda to a flamefest instead.

Some things just never change. :roll:

Listen to the audio at the 10 second mark.

 

[Captain America]

Listen to the audio at the 10 second mark.

Gonna make me have to work? :rofl

My point is, it's ALL propaganda. The push FOR Palin = propaganda. The Palin nay-sayers = propaganda.

FOX = blatant propaganda
MSNBC = blantant propaganda
NEWSMAX = blatant propaganda
Huffington Post = blatant propaganda
CNN = flip flop propaganda

I could go on, but you get my point, right?

All the "information" all these "know-it-all" political bloggers throw at me is rooted in their particular taste of propaganda.

It's ALL bullsh**!

They are all full of bullsh**!

But I don't care. In two and a half days I will be sitting in my deer stand with a high powered rifle in my hand. Everything else can just go to hell as far as I'm concerned.
:rofl

 

[Grim17]

Lets see here... You said:

...I am not the least bit surprised that all the FOXNews apologists will deny the obvious

Would that be the obviously edited clip that was posted?

and resort to viotrol and condensending insults

A liberal posts an obviously edited clip, that originated from a liberal website, that was designed to falsely attack Fox News, and I'm the bad guy because I called a spade a spade?

to divert the attention and focus off the topic of FOXNew's blatant propaganda

I would say my response was definitely "on topic", and as you put it, "I am not the least bit surprised" that you made excuses, didn't bother to retract your criticism of me, and chose not to address the fact that this entire thread was started based on a lie.

Have a nice evening.

.

 

[Sir Loin]

More like poor sodding hack at it again.:shrug:

 

[Captain America]

It really doesn't matter what one's message is if they deliver it with a caustic tongue. No one will listen.

If people wanted to hear from assholes, they would fart in public more. :rofl

 

[Sir Loin]

It really doesn't matter what one's message is if they deliver it with a caustic tongue. No one will listen.

If people wanted to hear from assholes, they would fart in public more. :rofl

I'd say that is precisely why the average Fox News OCD patient only appeals to sufferers of the same disorder. Persuasive Pete's Fox screeds are not. In fact I think his anti Fox screeds have the opposite effect that he intends. Aside from detailing his ideological obsession that just goes on and on and on. He could change his name here to Smeagol and come off slightly less maniacal IMO

 

[Grim17]

It really doesn't matter what one's message is if they deliver it with a caustic tongue. No one will listen.

If people wanted to hear from assholes, they would fart in public more. :rofl

And still no acknowledgment that it was a doctored video, and that my response was at least partially justified, even though you didn't care for the way I responded.

What could one discern from this?

 

[jackalope]

YouTube- Fox News' misleading Palin crowd shot

Seriously a week away from Jon Stewart exposing Hannity and they pull this?

"these pictures just in"... yea a year ago from a Presidential campaign rally...:roll:

Old faux .... at it again !

 

[jackalope]

And still no acknowledgment that it was a doctored video, and that my response was at least partially justified, even though you didn't care for the way I responded.

What could one discern from this?

bwaahahahahahahahah aaahhahahaaaaahhahahaaa !!!!!

The evil liberals did it !! OMGZ ****ing funny!
What will you say tomorrow, when they issue an on-air apology?

:lol:

UPDATE: Fox responded to the matter via The Swamp.

"This was a production error in which the copy editor changed a script and didn't alert the control room to update the video,'' Michael Clemente, senior vice president of news at FOX, sad this evening. "There will be an on-air explanation during Happening Now on Thursday."

Fox uses old Palin crowd footage - Michael Calderone - POLITICO.com

Sorry, dude ... NO DOCTORED VIDEO. Just more Faux.

 

[Grim17]

bwaahahahahahahahah aaahhahahaaaaahhahahaaa !!!!!

The evil liberals did it !! OMGZ ****ing funny!
What will you say tomorrow, when they issue an on-air apology?

:lol:





Sorry, dude ... NO DOCTORED VIDEO. Just more Faux.

Listen to the audio... It's pretty obvious it was spliced in at the 10 second mark.

As for the first 9 seconds of the clip, it's obvious he was expecting a video of the lines at the book signing to be shown... But hey, that's only a common sense opinion, so bash away pal.

.

 

[jackalope]

Listen to the audio... It's pretty obvious it was spliced in at the 10 second mark.

As for the first 9 seconds of the clip, it's obvious he was expecting a video of the lines at the book signing to be shown... But hey, that's only a common sense opinion, so bash away pal.

.

No, it's not obvious. BECAUSE IT WASN'T DOCTORED!

That's what Fox aired. And .... drumroll..... they will be apologizin' on the morrow for it.


Ain't no common sense in dismissing a solid, well-sourced website cause you don't like their lean. Think Progress backs up their articles.

:rofl

 

[Sir Loin]

No, it's not obvious. BECAUSE IT WASN'T DOCTORED!

That's what Fox aired. And .... drumroll..... they will be apologizin' on the morrow for it.


Ain't no common sense in dismissing a solid, well-sourced website cause you don't like their lean. Think Progress backs up their articles.

:rofl

So what is the giant change in ambient sound and the jumping track like sound, followed by two "the the" in a rows with very different tones? Sounds VERY suspicious to anyone with a ear and then if you consider the source, well let us just say this has the ring of the usual anti Fox "video" work. I mean really why post video from them in the first place? Much less one with this giant lurching mmmmluup the the in the middle of the "crucial" point of this truly INTERNET allegation? And pray tell how you know this IS what Fox aired? This should be good. G'head, dazzle us.

I know Pete is literally so obsessed as to be this desperate, so you too eh?

 

[jackalope]

So what is the giant change in ambient sound and the jumping track like sound, followed by two "the the" in a rows with very different tones? Sounds VERY suspicious to anyone with a ear and then if you consider the source, well let us just say this has the ring of the usual anti Fox "video" work. I mean really why post video from them in the first place? Much less one with this giant lurching mmmmluup the the in the middle of the "crucial" point of this truly INTERNET allegation? And pray tell how you know this IS what Fox aired? This should be good. G'head, dazzle us.

I know Pete is literally so obsessed as to be this desperate, so you too eh?

That's just Faux! Take it up with them. They aired it. And ... they'll be apologizin' for it too.


No evil liberal doctoring! :rofl

 

[Sir Loin]

That's just Faux! Take it up with them. They aired it. And ... they'll be apologizin' for it too.


No evil liberal doctoring! :rofl

You can no more assure us that is what was really aired than you can explain the obvious audio issues at the crucial point of the silly video. But sure, there you have it!!!! YouTube videos can't be doctored and NEWS FLASHES like this happen there and at Think Progress Home Page every day, numerous internet loons SWEAR it and follow it with emoticons!

No really you and Pete have your Rosetta Stone here! So why did you bother to get out of bed, aside from to hit the bong?

 

[jackalope]

You can no more assure us that is what was really aired than you can explain the obvious audio issues at the crucial point of the silly video. But sure, there you have it YouTube videos can't be doctored and NEWS FLASHES like this happen there and at Think Progress Home Page every day, to belive internet loons.

No really you and Pete have your Rosetta Stone here!

So why did you bother to get out of bed, aside from to hit the bong?

This is so silly ..... you have nothing to hold onto here. There's no alternative video showing 'what was really aired' ..... and Faux ADMITTED they aired the wrong footage. Again.

And yet, loyal fauxbots still defend! Desperate liberals are lying, lying I tell ya!


God, it's funny.

 

[Sir Loin]

This is so silly ..... you have nothing to hold onto here. There's no alternative video showing 'what was really aired' ..... and Faux ADMITTED they aired the wrong footage. Again.

And yet, loyal fauxbots still defend! Desperate liberals are lying, lying I tell ya!


God, it's funny.

You are right, it is silly how you just keep repeating your silly assurances there is nothing here. Nah no odd sounds, none at all. See how silly you look? Seriously, you have the answers to judge from your bilge. So aside from the word of you and the website running with the "out to out the radical right wing agenda" mission statement, what have you got? I suspect a smoldering bong.

 

[jackalope]

You are right, it is silly how you just keep repeating your silly assurances there is nothing here. Nah no odd sounds, none at all. See how silly you look? Seriously, you have the answers to judge from your bilge. So aside from the word of you and the website running with the "out to out the radical right wing agenda" mission statement, what have you got? I suspect a smoldering bong.

What are you talking about - I'm not saying there's nothing there. I'm saying Pete is right, FAUX is at it again!


What, exactly, are you saying? You and Grim? Other than some off the wall conspiracy theory. "The evil liberals did it! They made this up! It's not true!"


Never mind the facts, dammit, flat assertions are all that's needed, it seems. By fauxbot defenders. :lol::lol:


See, what you have here is MEDIA MATTERS and THINK PROGRESS with the straight dope, on the Fox falseness, once again.

Beauty.

 

[Sir Loin]

What are you talking about - I'm not saying there's nothing there. I'm saying Pete is right, FAUX is at it again!


What, exactly, are you saying? You and Grim? Other than some off the wall conspiracy theory. "The evil liberals did it! They made this up! It's not true!"


Never mind the facts, dammit, flat assertions are all that's needed, it seems. By fauxbot defenders. :lol::lol:


See, what you have here is MEDIA MATTERS and THINK PROGRESS with the straight dope, on the Fox falseness, once again.

Beauty.

Koo Koo Koo Koo. Bet your are a hoot at the full moon on a pint of shine and equally as eloquent and well spoken. Really I fear you may have soiled yourself with that last bad Khan Noonien Singh dissemblance.

So you actually are in bed and the bong is close at hand eh?

 

[jackalope]

Koo Koo Koo Koo. Bet your are a hoot at the full moon on a pint of shine and equally as eloquent and well spoken. Really I fear you may have soiled yourself with that last bad Khan Noonien Singh dissemblance.

So you actually are in bed and the bong is close at hand eh?

Were you under the mistaken impression that you were posting in the basement?

I see you have nothing at all left, relevant to the topic at hand (how could you, there's nothing left to say except, yup, Fox aired the wrong footage!), and are now resorting to trolling and personal attacks.

Excellent display! :thumbs:

:rofl

 

[Sir Loin]

Were you under the mistaken impression that you were posting in the basement?

I see you have nothing at all left, relevant to the topic at hand (how could you, there's nothing left to say except, yup, Fox aired the wrong footage!), and are now resorting to trolling and personal attacks.

Excellent display! :thumbs:

:rofl

Yip that is right, I just can't think of what could possibly be left for you to say, cackle or caterwaul about at this point. I even bet you think you're a real "internet debate winner" and that was a mighty persuasive argument you just spased your way through. Right? Chuckle.

 

[jackalope]

Yip that is right, I just can't think of what could possibly be left for you to say, cackle or caterwaul about at this point. I even bet you think you're a real "internet debate winner" and that was a mighty persuasive argument you just spased your way through. Right? Chuckle.

What was there to debate? There's nothing in question in this thread. Faux flubbed it once again. And the fauxbots tried to blame the evil liberal websites that pointed it out.


HILARIOUS !!!!!


I didn't come in to debate, I came in to see what the OP was talking about - ie what faux had done again, and then I laughed my ass off at the fauxhattery by the fauxbots.


Um, did you think YOU were debating?


I didn't see any arguments offered by you. Just some illogical off-the-wall made up accusations of doctoring videos.

 

[Sir Loin]

What was there to debate? There's nothing in question in this thread. Faux flubbed it once again. And the fauxbots tried to blame the evil liberal websites that pointed it out.


HILARIOUS !!!!!


I didn't come in to debate, I came in to see what the OP was talking about - it what faux had done again, and then I laughed my ass off at the fauxhattery by the fauxbots.


Um, did you think YOU were debating?


I didn't see any arguments offered by you. Just some illogical off-the-wall made up accusations of doctoring videos.

My advice to you at this point is really quite simple, when you are done with your bong...............