You're inputs?
Source
The WoT is without doubt a battle against radical Islam. I don't judge all Iranians on the statements and actions of Ahmadinejad. Are ordinary Iranians less sensible than I?
Iran was in violation of the NPT well before Mr. Bush entered the Oval Office. I'm not defending Bush's many bad policy decisions, but to imagine all would be well with Iran under a different US president is misleading and illusionary.From what I have seen of Iranian propoganda, the United States is portrayed in a very negative light from birth, by Clerics, and media alike.....Bush has simply given powerful ammunition to the machine already in place to create hatred.
Read the book "With god on their side" by Esther Kaplan then get back to me.IF there were cases of Christians in the past ten years beheading people,killing people over bible desecration,flying planes into buildings,sending in suicide bombers to bomb a bus a load of people,carrying signs that say behead those who insult Christianity and so on you might have a point.The funny thing is if we want to Muslim brutality all we got to do is turn the news on,if we want to see the same level of brutality commit by Christians we have to look in a history book.
Read the book "With god on their side" by Esther Kaplan then get back to me.
As for in the news, anyone wanna help me out with that group of morons that went to protest against returning soldiers funerals waving their hate slogans and so on?
The point james. is that fundamentalism regardless of whether it be a moon and star or cross are dangerous.
As you have to limit your question to the last 10 years is proof of even your recognition of Christian fundamentalists.
Simply that they do not perform public decapitations anymore does not symbolize that they are not making effects to a greater degree, just not so graphic.
A bunch of attention whores with some liberal anti-war agenda and god hates fags campaign,wow that sure does sound the same as all that all other crap going on in the ME by Islamo-nazis.
God hates fags and liberal anti-war agenda don't add up.
What liberal do you know is anti war and anti gay?
Jfuh, “As for in the news, anyone wanna help me out with that group of morons that went to protest against returning soldiers funerals waving their hate slogans and so on?”
”No true Christian should ever defend these people the their actions. Obviously they are not doing anything illegal. God will still judge them even if our laws won’t.
“The point james. is that fundamentalism regardless of whether it be a moon and star or cross are dangerous.”
“Simply that they do not perform public decapitations anymore does not symbolize that they are not making effects to a greater degree, just not so graphic.”
You're inputs?
Source
The WoT is without doubt a battle against radical Islam. I don't judge all Iranians on the statements and actions of Ahmadinejad. Are ordinary Iranians less sensible than I?
Considering the democrats history with the KKK I would have to say there are lots of liberals out there who are not only anti-war but they are also anti-gay.As I am sure others have pointed out liberalism is not progressive.
Categorically, any Christian action you give which resembles Islamic terrorism I will declare to be the work of Liberal Christian fundamentalism, as such actions run counter to the definition of conservatism.
Conservative Muslim fundamentalists do not commit acts of terrorism, and neither do conservative christian fundamentalists such as myself.
Army-of-God = liberal
The Nuremberg List = liberal
Just goes to show you can have thousands of posts and not learn a thing if that's what you set out to do.
If they were simply conservative - no issue. However when you stick in fundamentalist as you have - tthen yes, they feel a natural sense of self rightoueness and thus naturally entitled to certain actions that they believe god allow or bestows upon them - leading then the fundamentalists acts - ie terrorism.Categorically, any Christian action you give which resembles Islamic terrorism I will declare to be the work of Liberal Christian fundamentalism, as such actions run counter to the definition of conservatism.
Conservative Muslim fundamentalists do not commit acts of terrorism, and neither do conservative christian fundamentalists such as myself.
Army-of-God = liberal
The Nuremberg List = liberal
If they were simply conservative - no issue. However when you stick in fundamentalist as you have - tthen yes, they feel a natural sense of self rightoueness and thus naturally entitled to certain actions that they believe god allow or bestows upon them - leading then the fundamentalists acts - ie terrorism.
By no definition I have seen can I find any category of liberalism that can encompass the army of god or nuremberg list you've described perhaps you can offer up that definition and explain it some more?
I also seriously doubt you to be a christian fundamentalists hardcore maybe, but not quite to the point of fundamentalism.
If you are arrogant to facts then yes you are fundie, otherwis you are not. I don't beleive I've called anyone a terrorist.I am a conservative fundamentalist, are you saying that I am a terrorist?
Perhaps the operative word is "radical".
If you are arrogant to facts then yes you are fundie, otherwis you are not. I don't beleive I've called anyone a terrorist.
:doh yeah that."Arrogant to facts"...? What do you mean by that?
Do you mean oblivious to facts?
:doh yeah that.
If you are arrogant to facts then yes you are fundie, otherwis you are not. I don't beleive I've called anyone a terrorist.
One who begins his post with an ad-Hom losses all credibility to question the logic of others.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?