Sure. I'll put that right next to their support of eugenics and chopping off kids private parts because puberty is awkward.American Medical Association declares abortion bans ‘violation of human rights’
Story at a glance The American Medical Association is expanding its policies in a rebuttal to states that have enacted strict abortion bans. The leading medical association will expand legal …thehill.com
The American Medical Association announced it was implementing a new policy that would provide legal protections for patients and doctors against governments attempting to criminalize reproductive health services.
It looks like the doctors have made their stance known.
I disagree.Sure. I'll put that right next to their support of eugenics and chopping off kids private parts because puberty is awkward.
Left wing organizations say left wing things.
I disagree.
Doctors should not neglect their patients.
They should be able carry out the very best medical procedures for their patients including pregnant woman.
You are misinformed.We agree doctors should not neglect their patients. We disagree on whether this covers killing unborn children for the crime of being inconvenient.
Or, as they used to claim, by forcibly sterilizing them. Or, as they claim now, by cutting up the private parts of children because puberty is awkward.
Fetuses are babies and abortion is murder is the belief of evangelicals and Catholic clergy. It is a religious belief and your belief is perfectly acceptable. No one is ever going to bother you about this belief until you start trying to make Congress pas a law that all citizens have to honor your religious beliefs whether their religion or their lack of religion believes in that or not.Good. Now they need to lay out a compelling case as to why fetuses should not be considered "babies" and why abortion should not be considered "murder". Since that's, ya know, central to the entire debate and all.
That **** should have aborted me and her other pregnancies.Would you feel the same if your mother had aborted you?
No, because you would be dead.
Abortion is not murder. Fact. Adoption is wrong, IMO, though what another woman does is not my business.1. I'm am not required to believe or support any political dogma. It's politics, not a religion.
2. Wow, I truly hope that you do not actually feel that way about yourself. No one should feel that way.
3. I am solidly against abortion because it is murder, the ending of someone's life unjustly. The fact that other options, like adoption and orphanages, are not really explored by liberal politicians is truly troubling and seems to me to be a moral failure.
We agree doctors should not neglect their patients. We disagree on whether this covers killing unborn children for the crime of being inconvenient.
Fortunately, the unborn cannot commit crimes...it's always odd when some people choose to impose their feelings and emotions on the unborn which is incapable of doing so. Like anthropomorphizing other species.
It is emotionally manipulative tho, of course you know that.
And since women have abortions out of need, and not convenience,
I'd say there's no issue. Unless you are choosing to characterize everything in a person's life...health, job, responsibilities, education, commitments to others, etc as 'conveniences?' Are you? Are you reducing everything in a woman's life to 'conveniences?'
No - unborn children are definitely human.
It is accurate. That accurately describing the act and the loss of life is considered to be emotionally manipulative by those who wish to sustain this as a widespread procedure is.... Well, a bit telling.
VANISHINGLY few have abortion out of need, though, I would agree that in such cases where we are truly choosing between the life of the child or the life of the mother (or the life of the mother and the life of neither), abortion can be justified.
Certainly those are not needs.
THe unborn do not have rights and there is no baby in an abortion.I reckon that depends on the perspective of the human who's rights are being violated....the pregnant woman denied choice to slaughter baby or unborn baby being slaughtered.
Of course there is. I know it helps 'people' like you to be able to dehumanize the baby you endorse slaughtering, but it doesnt change the facts. Even the scientific definition of fetus states quite clearly that it is an unborn baby of a specific species.THe unborn do not have rights and there is no baby in an abortion.
"People" like me? Oh do tell! There is no baby to dehumanize or "slaughter." That's just emotionally based drivel. The scientific definition of a fetus is an offspring from 8 weeks gestation until birth. A fetus does not have rights nor is considered a person. Those are the facts!Of course there is. I know it helps 'people' like you to be able to dehumanize the baby you endorse slaughtering, but it doesnt change the facts. Even the scientific definition of fetus states quite clearly that it is an unborn baby of a specific species.
Of course there is. The unborn child is a baby in every circumstance except the one where you choose to endorse its slaughter. When most people find they are pregnant they celebrate the coming event, they are excited about the growing baby developing, they look forward to the baby, they care for and nurture the babies development, they prepare for the babies arrival. In the tragic event the baby is lost due to a miscarriage, they feel the loss, they mourn the loss."People" like me? Oh do tell! There is no baby to dehumanize or "slaughter." That's just emotionally based drivel. The scientific definition of a fetus is an offspring from 8 weeks gestation until birth. A fetus does not have rights nor is considered a person. Those are the facts!
Nothing but more emotional platitudes. How a woman reacts when pregnant is up to her. Some are happy about. Some are not. But your emotional appeals and transparent attack doesn't change the fact the unborn is notba baby until birth and that it still does not have rights or legal personhood.Of course there is. The unborn child is a baby in every circumstance except the one where you choose to endorse its slaughter. When most people find they are pregnant they celebrate the coming event, they are excited about the growing baby developing, they look forward to the baby, they care for and nurture the babies development, they prepare for the babies arrival. In the tragic event the baby is lost due to a miscarriage, they feel the loss, they mourn the loss.
Unless you support destroying the unborn baby. Then you dehumanize it so that your cheerful support of the butchering of unborn baby makes you less in human than your choices.
Those are just facts.
A fetus is an unborn , but NOT defined as as baby./infant.Of course there is. I know it helps 'people' like you to be able to dehumanize the baby you endorse slaughtering, but it doesnt change the facts. Even the scientific definition of fetus states quite clearly that it is an unborn baby of a specific species.
I know...you too are very intent on ignoring the fact that the babies you endorse the slaughter of are human.A fetus is an unborn , but NOT defined as as baby./infant.
A baby is a term of endearment.
A pet , a car, a boyfriend , a girlfriend etc. can all be refererred to as a baby.
In 2019 4 out 5 abortions in the United States occurred unter 9 weeks gestation while the unborn is still in embryo stage.
All together 92.7 percent occur during the first trimester.
The vast majority of those that take place after the first trimester are because something went wrong with pregnancy either affecting the health of the unborn or the woman’s health.
Nothing but more emotional platitudes. How a woman reacts when pregnant is up to her. Some are happy about. Some are not. But your emotional appeals and transparent attack doesn't change the fact the unborn is notba baby until birth and that it still does not have rights or legal personhood.
I know the unborn are human.I know...you too are very intent on ignoring the fact that the babies you endorse the slaughter of are human.
Sure it is. Unborn baby is an oxymoron as well as an emotionally charged term. But also irrelevant. If a woman wants an abortion for convenience, who cares? That's her business and no one else's. But her reasons is her own.
Its not emotional AT ALL. It is simply a statement of fact without the candycoating or dehumanizing you 'people' do to justify your cheerful support of the slaughter of 800,000 unborn babies a year in the name of convenience.
Unborn baby is a factual description of the child deveopling in a mothers womb. We provide all manner of care for the healthy development of babies as they grow. SO no...its not an emotional response...its factual, just as it is factual that the decision to with abandon and in the name of nothing more than convenience to slaughter 800,000 of them a year in this country alone is inhumane.Sure it is. Unborn baby is an oxymoron as well as an emotionally charged term. But also irrelevant. If a woman wants an abortion for convenience, who cares? That's her business and no one else's. But her reasons is her own.
The AMA has long been politicized.The AMA knows the best medical procedures for its patients.
Pretty unsafe for the baby, though, huh?An abortion before viability is far safer for a woman than pregnancy and childbirth.
Unborn baby is a misnomer. Embryo/fetus is a more accurate, scientific description. Care is offered. But utilizing it is up to the woman in question. Whether you think abortion is inhumane is just an opinion, irrelevant, and emotional.Unborn baby is a factual description of the child deveopling in a mothers womb. We provide all manner of care for the healthy development of babies as they grow. SO no...its not an emotional response...its factual, just as it is factual that the decision to with abandon and in the name of nothing more than convenience to slaughter 800,000 of them a year in this country alone is inhumane.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?