In this forum I have railed many times how democrats want to change history or totally forget it. It is happening again. They are screaming their heads off about President Trump appointing a judge to the Supreme Court in an election year. IT HAS HAPPEND 29 TIME IN US HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over it.
Then how about a little more history? It came from the worst president the country ever had tho---------------elections have consequences.
In this forum I have railed many times how democrats want to change history or totally forget it. It is happening again. They are screaming their heads off about President Trump appointing a judge to the Supreme Court in an election year. IT HAS HAPPEND 29 TIME IN US HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over it.
Then how about a little more history? It came from the worst president the country ever had tho---------------elections have consequences.
In this forum I have railed many times how democrats want to change history or totally forget it.
Against the wishes of RGB?Thats right...So don't cry when the Dems abolish the filibuster and add seats in the SC...
So should Miquel EstradaTrump absolutely has the right to appoint his justice of choice, and Garland should be a court justice right now. I guess sometimes what should happen doesn't. Man up and deal with it.
Why do you think it makes a difference, 144 days versus 43 days?The closest a SCOTUS confirmation has ever happened to a presidential election was on June 16, 1916, 144 days before the election. As of today, we have 43 days to go.
Why do you think it makes a difference, 144 days versus 43 days?
And who says that the Republicans couldnt further pack the court. Every election that a different party comes to power, more justices could be added. When would it end??????????
Those damn Democrats! They should take history lessons from the Stable Genius!In this forum I have railed many times how democrats want to change history or totally forget it. It is happening again. They are screaming their heads off about President Trump appointing a judge to the Supreme Court in an election year. IT HAS HAPPEND 29 TIME IN US HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over it.
Then how about a little more history? It came from the worst president the country ever had tho---------------elections have consequences.
i'd fully expect they'd confirm Biden's nomination. Same as when the Repubs opposed Garland and Dems opposed Estrada. It's how the COnstitution says it works. RGB understood this.Suppose that Biden wins the election, the Democrats take the Senate (but barely), and he nominates a SCOTUS justice in September of 2024. Think you'd be asking the Senate to wait?
The situation is not exactly the same. First lets remember that this is far from the first time that a President put forth a nominee in a Presidential election year. Both Repulbicans and democrats have done this in the modern era. The difference is that in 2016 there was a democrat President but a Republican senate and the senate controls the process. The republicans merely used the process as allowed but senate rules to prevent a vote from happening. Presently, 2020, there is a Republican President and a Republican Senate. The President doesn't stop being President just because it's an election year and the process of government doesn't end. Trump and the Republicans have every legal right to move forward as I'm sure democrats would do it they were in the same position.Trump absolutely has the right to appoint his justice of choice, and Garland should be a court justice right now. I guess sometimes what should happen doesn't. Man up and deal with it.
RGB wishes were for a justice to be decided after the election..Mcconnell and Trump are going to piss all over those wishes in hopes to destroy everything RBG fought and protected.Against the wishes of RGB?
True. There has never been a hypocritical politician before 2020. Glad to see you guys are on it.If Dems get the white house, senate, a long with the House of rep it will end however the Dems say it will end. Mcconnell and company started this with their hypocrisy and you better believe action will be taken so shit like what mcconnell is pulling doesnt happen again.
Thats right...So don't cry when the Dems abolish the filibuster and add seats in the SC...
Thats right...So don't cry when the Dems abolish the filibuster and add seats in the SC...
IF wishes were fishes ...RGB wishes were for a justice to be decided after the election..Mcconnell and Trump are going to piss all over those wishes in hopes to destroy everything RBG fought and protected.
you lose a confirmation battle and you're will to burn down the institutions. Dat's ****ed upAnd a couple of states like DC and PR.
Im glad you at least admitting the hypocrisy of McConnel.True. There has never been a hypocritical politician before 2020. Glad to see you guys are on it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?