• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AG William Barr says 'spying did occur' on Trump campaign, is reviewing whether it was lawful

I can read fine. I can also listen. I heard what he said yesterday. Didn't The Conservative Treehouse share the links to his testimony?

He didn't consult with Mueller. He is on record saying it. I didn't expect you to actually know that.

What part of "Mueller was not interested" do you not understand? Oh...all of it since it doesn't comply with your narrative.

What part of "Mueller is assisting in redactions" do you not understand? Oh...all of it since it doesn't comply with your narrative.
 
What is the conservative tree house?
Yes she was speechless and followed in disbelief comments.

No Trump doesn't have any thing to do with what I see so please stop the baiting bull**** you are known for on this forum. I and so did millions who were watching saw your damn senator lose her grip. . Barr's comments sent your senator on her heels. Period.

I feel sorry for people like you. Hope some day you get a grip.

unfortunately that time is long gone for them.
Ol yea the leftist state is having a melt down over an AG that is actually following the law.

Barr has years of excellent qualified service at the DOJ
 
What part of "Mueller was not interested" do you not understand? Oh...all of it since it doesn't comply with your narrative.

What part of "Mueller is assisting in redactions" do you not understand? Oh...all of it since it doesn't comply with your narrative.

Post a link to Mueller saying he was not interested in Barr's assessment of his report. I'll wait right here.
 
So you're the one responsible for running Hillary? And here everyone is mad at the DNC and Democratic primary voters. Now we all know it was you!

What will the Right do when Hillary is no longer around. Twenty Five years of Hilldog Derangement Syndrome is hard to quit.
 
Yep!
I just love the way the anti-Trump peeps are trying to tell us what Barr meant this morning. :roll:
I think it was pretty clear that Barr said he was concerned about illegal surveillance, admits that their was surveillance of Trump and his campaign, and that there is a basis for his concern that it was not predicated, though he admitted he was not saying illegal surveillance did occur. Hence, a review of the spying will happen as a result because of his concerns.. Don't forget the IG report is coming out next month as well. Tick tock, tick tock.

They were certain of Trump's conspiracy without evidence but today characters like Schiff, Nadler, and TV's Chuck Todd et al all insist there's no evidence of any silly old intel conspiracy.
 
What will the Right do when Hillary is no longer around. Twenty Five years of Hilldog Derangement Syndrome is hard to quit.

American seems to have a massive crush on her. Three years later and he can't stop talking about her.
 
Post a link to Mueller saying he was not interested in Barr's assessment of his report. I'll wait right here.

Mueller didn't say it. Doesn't make it untrue.

LOL!!

For someone who regularly believes unnamed sources without question, you should be all in when a named source says something, don't you think?

Well, you would...if they said something that supports your narrative. Right? Otherwise, they are just lying. Right?
 
I have seen little evidence of that thus far.

yawning.jpg
 
They were certain of Trump's conspiracy without evidence but today characters like Schiff, Nadler, and TV's Chuck Todd et al all insist there's no evidence of any silly old intel conspiracy.

And the evidence of a conspiracy theory is...what? Barr didn't provide any. The DOJ said previously nobody's wires were "tapped". What evidence do you have that nobody else seems to have?
 
Mueller didn't say it. Doesn't make it untrue.

LOL!!

For someone who regularly believes unnamed sources without question, you should be all in when a named source says something, don't you think?

Well, you would...if they said something that supports your narrative. Right? Otherwise, they are just lying. Right?

Ah, so you admit you just made that up. Shocking!

Come back when you have evidence of your claim, Mycroft. I'm not the one who just lied. That was you.
 
And the evidence of a conspiracy theory is...what? Barr didn't provide any. The DOJ said previously nobody's wires were "tapped". What evidence do you have that nobody else seems to have?

4 FISA warrants to surveil Carter Page, for one.
 
Ah, so you admit you just made that up. Shocking!

Come back when you have evidence of your claim, Mycroft. I'm not the one who just lied. That was you.

I made nothing up.
 
And the evidence of a conspiracy theory is...what? Barr didn't provide any. The DOJ said previously nobody's wires were "tapped". What evidence do you have that nobody else seems to have?

Everybody's wires are tapped. It's what the NSA does.

The question is...did someone illegally access the NSA database to get information? That would be spying.
 
And the evidence of a conspiracy theory is...what? Barr didn't provide any. The DOJ said previously nobody's wires were "tapped". What evidence do you have that nobody else seems to have?

Hmm.. why go to a FISA "court" (multiiple times) if not to get permission for conducting surveillance?
 
Hmm.. why go to a FISA "court" (multiiple times) if not to get permission for conducting surveillance?

You mean Carter Page? That was going on long before Trump declared his candidacy.

Barr seems to think there is such a thing as "lawful spying". You'd have to ask him. Presumably he didn't shoot his mouth off yesterday without doing a single minute of research.
 
Everybody's wires are tapped. It's what the NSA does.

The question is...did someone illegally access the NSA database to get information? That would be spying.

So the Trump DOJ lied when they said his wires in Trump Tower weren't tapped. Got it.
 
IMO, wild, unhinged and comical fantasies should never be the basis of an opinion.

"Coup"? LOL! Words have meanings.

Would it comfort you to say "Unsuccessful Coup" or "Attempted Coup"? Incompetence has come to be the hallmark of our spy agencies. Ever find those WMD?

Words do have meanings and this coup failed. Failure does not indicate it was never attempted.

Texas Tech is not the National Championship Basketball program. Because they did not beat Virginia, are you saying that they did not play basketball?
 
I made nothing up.

Stop lying. You said Mueller wasn't interested. When I asked you to prove it, you backed right off.

You are incapable of being honest. No wonder you feel kinship to Donald Trump. He can't either, and like you, he lies about the dumbest things.
 
That was the quote from the OP, and my question too.

WTF is "Lawful spying of a presidential campaign?"
Somebody alert the Nixon family, the record needs to be amended.

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
 
I think its way past time for this.
Hillary-Billary got away with Gross Negligence because the Obamy DOJ and AG didn't 'want' to prosecute, against the urgings of the FBI.
The entire 2016 election cycle was one Democratic cheat after another. They frigged over Bernie Sanders, they paid for the Steele Dossier, they lied to the FISA judge 4 bloody times so they could spy on an American citizen, they used very questionable techniques in order to trap ONLY TRUMP ASSOCIATES into perjury, they sent an assault team to an old man's home...after first notifying CNN of course, they dragged an honorable judge through the mud in public, and have screamed at the moon like mobs of gawd-damn children. It ****in' high time these bastards pay.
 
American seems to have a massive crush on her. Three years later and he can't stop talking about her.

I believe American watches far too much Hannity, impedes the thought process.
 
You mean Carter Page? That was going on long before Trump declared his candidacy.

Barr seems to think there is such a thing as "lawful spying". You'd have to ask him. Presumably he didn't shoot his mouth off yesterday without doing a single minute of research.

Of course, there is. What Barr wishes to find out is whether the material presented to FISA was honest and complete.
 
Back
Top Bottom