- Joined
- Jan 13, 2012
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 6,769
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
I didn't say the current system was working well, but there are other options besides judging people and imposing fees.
These sort of illegal arrangements need to be cracked down on. These children are at risk. If you read the whole Reuters report, you'll see a story about a boy being "re-homed" in another state with a pedophile.
If governments are going to have a say in who gets to adopt (which they do), they should be looking at these "under the table" adoptions. If these kids were adopted internationally (which many were), they were OKed by the Departments of State and Homeland Security. Yet once they get in the country, the government turns a blind eye.
I find it disturbing that someone who is pro-life seems to think that this is about small government. Do you even care about the kids' welfare, or are they on their own after birth?
Care to elaborate on your "point?" Because all I saw was deflection and blame.
Well, you certainly make a whole lot of assumption about me for asking a simple question don't you? Look, I can agree that if we are to allow government to say what, or who is ok to adopt in an international sense then the onus is on them to vet the prospective parent/parents fully to ensure that the child is going to a good home.
But in a limited sense I think that we should be focusing on American children first...This story is about a horribly unqualified parent torturing a child, and should face the harshest of penalties for her actions. Is it a perfect world? Hell no. But, 'government' is not always the answer to everything.
Of course that's all you saw. It's all you wanted to see.
It's a part of a whole investigation into "re-homing" which occurs under the radar, it's not one story about one kid. Even so, child safety is a place for the "government" to get involved.
And these are American children. According to the law, they become American citizens when the plane lands. It also is happening to children who were born and adopted within the US. By any measure, they are Americans.
State or Federal?
Crap, but creative.This is just one more reason supporting the assertion that the state has no place in regulating parents and children. Who is the state to tell this mother she can't abuse her kids as she see fits? This is just an intrusion intro privacy. I mean, we can deny kids healthcare but we can't make them dig their own graves? What's next? We can't bring them into religious cults that place their lives in danger? This is an affront to freedom of parenthood. Endangering my kids is a right damn it.
When they're crossing state lines, it's federal.
So, should permits be required to have children? Including a background check? How about a $5K license fee (goes into the child's education or SS fund)?
Crap, but creative.
You do pose a good question though - "who is the State to..." < Fill in the blank > ?
What makes the State a decent arbiter of.... anything? And why are some so totally enamored with the State's ability to "cure" issues like this one? Is the State a demonstrably good parent that it can dictate, let alone enforce what makes a "good parent?" What is the State's record as a parent? How many kids has the State had? What was their GPA in school?
I know who speaks for the State - politicians who we seem to eagerly listen to, and vote for, but whose own personal lives we conveniently and often embarrassingly ignore.
I know everyone here reading this would eagerly have the State into their home to "inspect" how they were doing with their kids, their chores, their... yes even their taxes. The State is so wonderful, we'd have them over for beer and brats, to listen to their wisdom, to sit at their compassionate feet. We'd shower them with laurels and rose petals. We'd confess our every sin to them, begging for forgiveness and restoration. We'd tell our friends about the State, how excited we are to have them visit us. We'd invite them over to meet the State so they too could be as blessed as we...
NOT.
mmmk, so what part of the Constitution covers that? Commerce clause?
Crap, but creative.
You do pose a good question though - "who is the State to..." < Fill in the blank > ?
What makes the State a decent arbiter of.... anything? And why are some so totally enamored with the State's ability to "cure" issues like this one? Is the State a demonstrably good parent that it can dictate, let alone enforce what makes a "good parent?" What is the State's record as a parent? How many kids has the State had? What was their GPA in school?
I know who speaks for the State - politicians who we seem to eagerly listen to, and vote for, but whose own personal lives we conveniently and often embarrassingly ignore.
I know everyone here reading this would eagerly have the State into their home to "inspect" how they were doing with their kids, their chores, their... yes even their taxes. The State is so wonderful, we'd have them over for beer and brats, to listen to their wisdom, to sit at their compassionate feet. We'd shower them with laurels and rose petals. We'd confess our every sin to them, begging for forgiveness and restoration. We'd tell our friends about the State, how excited we are to have them visit us. We'd invite them over to meet the State so they too could be as blessed as we...
NOT.
I'm more surprised that unwanted children aren't more frequently being harvested for their organs.So instead, we should just let people hand their children over to pedophiles?
Well, if your world consists of "flower power commune liberals," "overzealous conservatives," "average nutbags," and... the State, then perhaps that makes sense.The state seems to be doing a pretty good job at taking abused children away from overzealous conservatives and flower power commune liberals. I trust it more than I do the average nutbag that makes their kid dig their own grave.
People do horrible things like to their own children. I am not sure there is anything that can be done. There will always be gaps.
Crap, but creative.
You do pose a good question though - "who is the State to..." < Fill in the blank > ?
What makes the State a decent arbiter of.... anything? And why are some so totally enamored with the State's ability to "cure" issues like this one? Is the State a demonstrably good parent that it can dictate, let alone enforce what makes a "good parent?" What is the State's record as a parent? How many kids has the State had? What was their GPA in school?
I know who speaks for the State - politicians who we seem to eagerly listen to, and vote for, but whose own personal lives we conveniently and often embarrassingly ignore.
I know everyone here reading this would eagerly have the State into their home to "inspect" how they were doing with their kids, their chores, their... yes even their taxes. The State is so wonderful, we'd have them over for beer and brats, to listen to their wisdom, to sit at their compassionate feet. We'd shower them with laurels and rose petals. We'd confess our every sin to them, begging for forgiveness and restoration. We'd tell our friends about the State, how excited we are to have them visit us. We'd invite them over to meet the State so they too could be as blessed as we...
NOT.
You could say that. Though your sudden interest in "the Constitution" is fascinating. How about the same part of the Constitution that gives Congress the power to ban partial birth abortion? The same part that puts drug trafficking in the hands of the federal government.
Like it or not, these children are being trafficked across state lines for purposes that aren't in their best interest. Admit it - you are trying to find any excuse to allow this to continue. Why?
Now there's the attitude! :dohNah, we're far better off keeping the state out of all of this stuff, and if a few kids - or a hundred thousand - get killed or abused by their parents, hey them's the breaks. Wouldn't want them damned social workers trying to protect kids, would we?
Terrible stories of child abuse out side of the adoption system were parents put adds up online to take their children . There are even more accounts of this happing in a study by
Reuters .
Adopted girl says mother forced her to dig her own grave - Investigations
Always must take the extreme emotional tact, eh?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?