- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 59,826
- Reaction score
- 30,567
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I think what people are responding to who think that are responding to trump's character - his character being one that would do that, and they're right about his character.
But I don't think trump would do it.
trump is an utterly corrupt, selfish, narcissist. He's out for his own benefit. And there is no way that refusing to give up power ends any way other than disaster for him, and he knows that. Even if he had millions of Americans supporting his doing so and calling for civil war, it would not end well for him. For one example alone, the military is a hell of a lot more loyal to the country than to trump.
A second issue is that this 'hold onto power' thing is usually about corrupt people who want power for its own sake, and who get their wealth from that power, stealing the wealth of the country.
trump is neither some ideologue who wants political power particularly - he doesn't give a crap about anything except his own benefits - and being in office isn't a source of wealth for him (much). He's not pocketing the US treasury. He'd have a lot more freedom out of office. He never expected to win in the first place. He doesn't have the normal motives for wanting to cling to power, other than to remain unprosecutable.
And even that prosecution motive, which is very real, is a motive for him to try to win, but not to try to seize power if he loses, because the price to him would be even worse than the prosecutions.
In short, the issue is simply what benefits him.
And that is not trying to seize power. So I don't think it will happen. That it's a non-issue, even though the people who suspect it - including his biographer, as I recall - are right about his character.
But I don't think trump would do it.
trump is an utterly corrupt, selfish, narcissist. He's out for his own benefit. And there is no way that refusing to give up power ends any way other than disaster for him, and he knows that. Even if he had millions of Americans supporting his doing so and calling for civil war, it would not end well for him. For one example alone, the military is a hell of a lot more loyal to the country than to trump.
A second issue is that this 'hold onto power' thing is usually about corrupt people who want power for its own sake, and who get their wealth from that power, stealing the wealth of the country.
trump is neither some ideologue who wants political power particularly - he doesn't give a crap about anything except his own benefits - and being in office isn't a source of wealth for him (much). He's not pocketing the US treasury. He'd have a lot more freedom out of office. He never expected to win in the first place. He doesn't have the normal motives for wanting to cling to power, other than to remain unprosecutable.
And even that prosecution motive, which is very real, is a motive for him to try to win, but not to try to seize power if he loses, because the price to him would be even worse than the prosecutions.
In short, the issue is simply what benefits him.
And that is not trying to seize power. So I don't think it will happen. That it's a non-issue, even though the people who suspect it - including his biographer, as I recall - are right about his character.