I've been away, so only just became aware of the rule. I try to ensure I use a cite and/or link - and quotation marks - whenever I post anything that is not my own language. That includes when I post AI generated synopses. Of course, slip-ups happen, but as a journalist, writer and lawyer, attribution was drilled into me, as the result of failure is a charge of plagiarism (or worse). This rule seems to be directed at attribution.
As AI becomes more ubiquitous, it becomes harder to ensure accurate attribution, though (as not all AI systems are very good at this), but I assume this will be a judgment call for the Moderators - add it to a long list, sorry about that - so I think all that any of us can do is, do our best.
Translation, I think, has to be a separate consideration, but clarity on that point needs to come from the Mod team. The point seems to be to ensure the content is yours, even if the language it was written in was not your own, at least I hope so. I use translators, sometimes, to check my word choices because I speak (write) no other languages more than poorly, and extremely limitedly - despite years of formal French classes. (Some would say the same for my English.)
Another thought occurred to me that would otherwise trap all of us: autocorrect. I've often found it "correcting" (corrupting) what I wrote, but any time it is turned on one would be "using AI" to write for you. I'd put translators in the same category. Common sense has to prevail.
).
" and that, wether or not I have used it, would make sure I'll be safe from being banned? Or? @RedAkston? But I still would have to reframe for doing more intellectual challenging threads.
